Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Intrinsic connectivity patterns of striatal subfields predict individual dimensions of psychopathology and are associated with cholinergic and serotonergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia

Abstract

Symptoms of schizophrenia may reflect different pathophysiological processes in the striatum, but the links between striatal subfield connectivity, symptom dimensions, and molecular architectures remain unclear. Using connectivity profiles from 12 striatal subfields to predict negative, positive, affective, and cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia, we identified consistent connectivity features through cross-validations and validated with leave-one-site-out analysis and an independent dataset. Feature importance scores for brain parcels linked through consistent connectivity features that predicted symptoms were spatially correlated with density maps of 19 receptors/transporters from prior molecular imaging in healthy populations using partial least squares. We found that the connectivity profiles of the rostral and ventral striatal subfields significantly predicted affective and cognitive symptoms, respectively, and these predictions were generalized to the independent sample. Feature importance scores for brain parcels connected to the ventral striatum (predicting cognitive symptoms) were spatially correlated with density maps of both the vesicular acetylcholine transporter and the serotonin 1 A receptor. By contrast, importance scores for parcels linked to rostral striatal connectivity (predicting affective symptoms) were specifically associated with the spatial distribution of the serotonin 1 A receptor. Here, we show specific striatal connectivity patterns related to symptom dimensions and indicate multiple neurotransmitter systems to underlie the reward-related disturbances in schizophrenia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Study overview.
Fig. 2: Prediction of symptom dimensions by the functional profiles of each of the 12 striatal subfields using linear regression models with Lasso penalty.
Fig. 3: Feature selection, independent validation, and interpretation of the selected overlapping connectivity features based on their relative importance in generalizing symptom predictions and functional characterization of the involved brain regions.
Fig. 4: Neurotransmitter distribution pattern in the association with the selected connectivity profile for the right rostral and ventral striatal subfields that predicted affective and cognitive symptoms.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Information for the main sample used in the present study have been included in the Supplementary Materials. The raw data of the main sample recruited from 7 international institutions are protected and are not publicly available due to data privacy. These data can be accessed upon reasonable request to the principal investigator of each data collection institution. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (chen.ji@sjtu.edu.cn) upon request. The B-SNIP data that support the findings of this study are publicly available on the database of the NIMH Data Archive (NDA, https://nda.nih.gov/); a data access request must be approved to protect the confidentiality of participants. The density maps of 19 neurotransmitter receptors and transporters for the partial least square regression analysis are available at https://github.com/netneurolab/hansen_receptors. Source data are provided with this paper. MATLAB scripts to run the main analyses have been made publicly available via the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/auy4n. Matlab scripts written to perform additional post-hoc analyses are available from the authors upon request. Code used to perform sparse canonical correlation analysis is available at https://github.com/cedricx/sCCA/tree/master/sCCA/code/final.

References

  1. Jobe TH, Harrow M. Schizophrenia Course, Long-Term Outcome, Recovery, and Prognosis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19:220–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P, Schultz S, Miller D, Gupta S, Swayze V, et al. Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia - Past, Present, and Future. Acta Psychiat Scand. 1994;90:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen J, Patil KR, Weis S, Sim K, Nickl-Jockschat T, Zhou J, et al. Neurobiological Divergence of the Positive and Negative Schizophrenia Subtypes Identified on a New Factor Structure of Psychopathology Using Non-negative Factorization: An International Machine Learning Study. Biol Psychiat. 2020;87:282–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li A, Zalesky A, Yue W, Howes O, Yan H, Liu Y, et al. A neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia. Nat Med. 2020;26:558–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarpal DK, Robinson DG, Lencz T, Argyelan M, Ikuta T, Karlsgodt K, et al. Antipsychotic Treatment and Functional Connectivity of the Striatum in First-Episode Schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiat. 2015;72:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ford AA, Triplett W, Sudhyadhom A, Gullett J, McGregor K, FitzGerald DB, et al. Broca’s area and its striatal and thalamic connections: a diffusion-MRI tractography study. Front Neuroanat. 2013;7:1–12.

  7. McCutcheon RA, Abi-Dargham A, Howes OD. Schizophrenia, Dopamine and the Striatum: From Biology to Symptoms. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42:205–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon JH, Minzenberg MJ, Raouf S, D’Esposito M, Carter CS. Impaired Prefrontal-Basal Ganglia Functional Connectivity and Substantia Nigra Hyperactivity in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiat. 2013;74:122–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinz A, Murray GK, Schlagenhauf F, Sterzer P, Grace AA, Waltz JA. Towards a unifying cognitive, neurophysiological, and computational neuroscience account of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2019;45:1092–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrlich S, Yendiki A, Greve DN, Manoach DS, Ho BC, White T, et al. Striatal function in relation to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2012;42:267–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornito A, Harrison BJ, Goodby E, Dean A, Ooi C, Nathan PJ, et al. Functional Dysconnectivity of Corticostriatal Circuitry as a Risk Phenotype for Psychosis. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70:1143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shukla DK, Chiappelli JJ, Sampath H, Kochunov P, Hare SM, Wisner K, et al. Aberrant Frontostriatal Connectivity in Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2019;45:1051–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorg C, Manoliu A, Neufang S, Myers N, Peters H, Schwerthöffer D, et al. Increased Intrinsic Brain Activity in the Striatum Reflects Symptom Dimensions in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2013;39:387–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uno Y, Coyle JT. Glutamate hypothesis in schizophrenia. Psychiat Clin Neuros. 2019;73:204–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higley MJ, Picciotto MR. Neuromodulation by acetylcholine: examples from schizophrenia and depression. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;29:88–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang AC, Tsai S-J. New targets for schizophrenia treatment beyond the dopamine hypothesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wassef A, Baker J, Kochan LD. GABA and schizophrenia: a review of basic science and clinical studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;23:601–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Muller VI, Dukart J, Hoffstaedter F, Baker JT, Holmes AJ, et al. Intrinsic Connectivity Patterns of Task-Defined Brain Networks Allow Individual Prediction of Cognitive Symptom Dimension of Schizophrenia and Are Linked to Molecular Architecture. Biol Psychiat. 2021;89:308–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang H, Wang X, Qin X, Xu R, Xiong Y, Chen C, et al. Distinct structural deficits in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and their putative neurotransmitter basis: a source-based morphometry analysis. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025;50:1–10.

  20. Yao G, Pan J, Zou T, Li J, Li J, He X, et al. Structure–function coupling changes in first-episode, treatment-naïve schizophrenia correlate with cell type-specific transcriptional signature. BMC Med. 2024;22:491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang Y, Palaniyappan L, Luo C, Chang X, Zhang J, Tang Y, et al. Neuroimaging epicenters as potential sites of onset of the neuroanatomical pathology in schizophrenia. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadk6063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding C, Li A, Xie S, Tian X, Li K, Fan L, et al. Mapping brain synergy dysfunction in schizophrenia: Understanding individual differences and underlying molecular mechanisms. Adv Sci. 2024;11:2400929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. García-San-Martín N, Bethlehem RA, Segura P, Mihalik A, Seidlitz J, Sebenius I, et al. Reduced brain structural similarity is associated with maturation, neurobiological features, and clinical status in schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2025;16:8745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang Y, Palaniyappan L, Chang X, Zhang J, Zhou E, Yu X, et al. Gray matter volume heterogeneity by stage, site of origin and pathophysiology in schizophrenia. Nature Mental Health. 2025;3:1–11.

  25. Luo Y, Dong D, Huang H, Zhou J, Zuo X, Hu J, et al. Associating multimodal neuroimaging abnormalities with the transcriptome and neurotransmitter signatures in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2023;49:1554–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hou C, Jiang S, Liu M, Li H, Zhang L, Duan M, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of functional connectivity and association with molecular architecture in schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex. 2023;33:9095–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo Z, Xiao S, Sun S, Su T, Tang X, Chen G, et al. Neural Activity Alterations and Their Association With Neurotransmitter and Genetic Profiles in Schizophrenia: Evidence From Clinical Patients and Unaffected Relatives. CNS Neurosci Therapeut. 2025;31:e70218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyamoto S, Duncan GE, Marx CE, Lieberman JA. Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs. Mol Psychiatr. 2005;10:79–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tandon R. Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: An Overview. J Clin Psychiat. 2011;72:4–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu XJ, Eickhoff SB, Hoffstaedter F, Genon S, Caspers S, Reetz K, et al. Joint Multi-modal Parcellation of the Human Striatum: Functions and Clinical Relevance. Neurosci Bull. 2020;36:1123–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hansen JY, Shafiei G, Markello RD, Smart K, Cox SML, Norgaard M, et al. Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:1569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheng B, Chen J, Konigsberg A, Mayer C, Rimmele L, Patil KR, et al. Mapping the deficit dimension structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Ebiomedicine. 2023;87:104425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmermann S, Sakreida K, Bludau S, Camilleri JA, Hoffstaedter F, Pelzer DI, et al. Asymmetry, cytoarchitectonic morphology and genetics associated with Broca’s area in schizophrenia. Nat Ment Health. 2024;2:310–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grahn JA, Parkinson JA, Owen AM. The cognitive functions of the caudate nucleus. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;86:141–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morris R, Vercammen A, Lenroot R, Moore L, Langton JM, Short B, et al. Disambiguating ventral striatum fMRI-related BOLD signal during reward prediction in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatr. 2012;17:280–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. O’doherty JP. Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:4–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Marchand WR, Lee JN, Suchy Y, Garn C, Chelune G, Johnson S, et al. Functional architecture of the cortico-basal ganglia circuitry during motor task execution: Correlations of strength of functional connectivity with neuropsychological task performance among female subjects. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34:1194–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson JL, Laird AR, Glahn DC, Blangero J, Sanghera MK, Pessoa L, et al. The functional connectivity of the human caudate: an application of meta-analytic connectivity modeling with behavioral filtering. Neuroimage. 2012;60:117–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Suslow T, Kugel H, Reber H, Bauer J, Dannlowski U, Kersting A, et al. Automatic brain response to facial emotion as a function of implicitly and explicitly measured extraversion. Neuroscience. 2010;167:111–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goghari VM, Sanford N, Spilka MJ, Woodward TS. Task-Related Functional Connectivity Analysis of Emotion Discrimination in a Family Study of Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43:1348–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Seger CA. The visual corticostriatal loop through the tail of the caudate: circuitry and function. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang GJ, Murray JD, Repovs G, Cole MW, Savic A, Glasser MF, et al. Altered global brain signal in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:7438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Schaefer A, Kong R, Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Zuo XN, Holmes AJ, et al. Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28:3095–114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tian Y, Margulies DS, Breakspear M, Zalesky A. Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xia X, Fan L, Cheng C, Eickhoff SB, Chen J, Li H, et al. Multimodal connectivity-based parcellation reveals a shell-core dichotomy of the human nucleus accumbens. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:3878–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim HE, Kim J-J, Seok J-H, Park JY, Oh J. Resting-state functional connectivity and cognitive performance in aging adults with cognitive decline: A data-driven multivariate pattern analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2023;152445:1–10.

  48. Chen JZ, Ooi LQR, Tan TWK, Zhang SS, Li JW, Asplund CL, et al. Relationship between prediction accuracy and feature importance reliability: An empirical and theoretical study. Neuroimage. 2023;274:1–13.

  49. Chen J, Patil KR, Yeo BTT, Eickhoff SB. Leveraging Machine Learning for Gaining Neurobiological and Nosological Insights in Psychiatric Research. Biol Psychiat. 2023;93:18–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nesterov Y. Subgradient methods for huge-scale optimization problems. Math Program. 2014;146:275–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. He T, An LJ, Chen PS, Chen JZ, Feng JS, Bzdok D, et al. Meta-matching as a simple framework to translate phenotypic predictive models from big to small data. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Haufe S, Meinecke F, Görgen K, Dähne S, Haynes JD, Blankertz B, et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2014;87:96–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wu JX, Li JW, Eickhoff SB, Scheinost D, Genon S. The challenges and prospects of brain-based prediction of behaviour. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7:1255–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Xia CH, Ma Z, Ciric R, Gu S, Betzel RF, Kaczkurkin AN, et al. Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:1–15.

  56. Wei Y, de Lange SC, Pijnenburg R, Scholtens LH, Ardesch DJ, Watanabe K, et al. Wiley Online Library, 2022.

  57. Váša F, Seidlitz J, Romero-Garcia R, Whitaker KJ, Rosenthal G, Vértes PE, et al. Adolescent tuning of association cortex in human structural brain networks. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28:281–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Feng L, Liu Z, Li C, Li Z, Lou X, Shao L, et al. Development and validation of a radiopathomics model to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4:e8–e17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1125–65.

  60. Mueller S, Wang DH, Pan RQ, Holt DJ, Liu HS. Abnormalities in Hemispheric Specialization of Caudate Nucleus Connectivity in Schizophrenia. Jama Psychiat. 2015;72:552–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang B, Lin P, Wang XS, Öngür D, Ji XL, Situ WJ, et al. Altered Functional Connectivity of Striatum Based on the Integrated Connectivity Model in First-Episode Schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:1–13.

  62. Johnston PJ, Stojanov W, Devir H, Schall U. Functional MRI of facial emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia and their electrophysiological correlates. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1221–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Derntl B, Finkelmeyer A, Voss B, Eickhoff SB, Kellermann T, Schneider F, et al. Neural correlates of the core facets of empathy in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;136:70–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Abramowitz AC, Ginger EJ, Gollan JK, Smith MJ. Empathy, depressive symptoms, and social functioning among individuals with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2014;216:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fallon N, Roberts C, Stancak A. Shared and distinct functional networks for empathy and pain processing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020;15:709–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ryun S, Kim M, Kim JS, Chung CK. Cortical maps of somatosensory perception in human. Neuroimage. 2023;276:1–14.

  67. Horan WP, Jimenez AM, Lee J, Wynn JK, Eisenberger NI, Green MF. Pain empathy in schizophrenia: an fMRI study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11:783–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Uddin LQ. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Roelofs K, Bramson B, Toni I. A neurocognitive theory of flexible emotion control: The role of the lateral frontal pole in emotion regulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1525:28–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Pizzagalli DA, Roberts AC. Prefrontal cortex and depression. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022;47:225–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Willinger, Karipidis III D, Neuer S, Emery S, Rauch C, Haberling I, et al. Maladaptive Avoidance Learning in the Orbitofrontal Cortex in Adolescents With Major Depression. Biol Psychiat-Cogn N. 2022;7:293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Liang S, Wu Y, Hanxiaoran L, Greenshaw AJ, Li T. Anhedonia in depression and schizophrenia: Brain reward and aversion circuits. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022;18:1385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kondo H, Osaka N, Osaka M. Cooperation of the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for attention shifting. Neuroimage. 2004;23:670–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Silva A, Limongi R, MacKinley M, Palaniyappan L. Small words that matter: linguistic style and conceptual disorganization in untreated first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull Open. 2021;2:sgab010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Guillem F, Rinaldi M, Pampoulova T, Stip E. The complex relationships between executive functions and positive symptoms in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2008;38:853–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Clark LK, Warman D, Lysaker PH. The relationships between schizophrenia symptom dimensions and executive functioning components. Schizophr Res. 2010;124:169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Dabiri M, Dehghani Firouzabadi F, Yang K, Barker PB, Lee RR, Yousem DM. Neuroimaging in schizophrenia: A review article. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1042814.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Di Martino A, Scheres A, Margulies DS, Kelly AM, Uddin LQ, Shehzad Z, et al. Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state FMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:2735–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Haber SN, Fudge JL, McFarland NR. Striatonigrostriatal pathways in primates form an ascending spiral from the shell to the dorsolateral striatum. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2369–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Catani M, Dell’Acqua F, De Schotten MT. A revised limbic system model for memory, emotion and behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1724–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Mucci A, Dima D, Soricelli A, Volpe U, Bucci P, Frangou S, et al. Is avolition in schizophrenia associated with a deficit of dorsal caudate activity? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study during reward anticipation and feedback. Psychol Med. 2015;45:1765–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Von Der Heide RJ, Skipper LM, Klobusicky E, Olson IR. Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: disorders, controversies and a hypothesis. Brain. 2013;136:1692–707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Wolff M, Vann SD. The Cognitive Thalamus as a Gateway to Mental Representations. J Neurosci. 2019;39:3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Andreasen NC, OLeary DS, Cizadlo T, Arndt S, Rezai K, Ponto LLB, et al. Schizophrenia and cognitive dysmetria: A positron-emission tomography study of dysfunctional prefrontal-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Griffin JD, Fletcher PC. Predictive Processing, Source Monitoring, and Psychosis. Annu Rev Clin Psycho. 2017;13:265–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Andreasen NC, Paradiso S, O’Leary DS. Cognitive dysmetria” as an integrative theory of schizophrenia: a dysfunction in cortical-subcortical-cerebellar circuitry? Schizophrenia Bull. 1998;24:203–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Forsyth JK, Bolbecker AR, Mehta CS, Klaunig MJ, Steinmetz JE, O’Donnell BF, et al. Cerebellar-dependent eyeblink conditioning deficits in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Bull. 2012;38:751–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wang Z, Xue K, Kang Y, Liu Z, Cheng J, Zhang Y, et al. Altered intrinsic neural activity and its molecular analyses in first-episode schizophrenia with auditory verbal hallucinations. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1478963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Amenta F, Tayebati SK. Pathways of acetylcholine synthesis, transport and release as targets for treatment of adult-onset cognitive dysfunction. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:488–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Xu M-y, Wong AH. GABAergic inhibitory neurons as therapeutic targets for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018;39:733–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Lawn T, Giacomel A, Martins D, Veronese M, Howard M, Turkheimer FE, et al. Normative modelling of molecular-based functional neurocircuits captures clinical heterogeneity transdiagnostically in neuropsychiatric patients. bioRxiv. 2023:2023.10. 21.563428.

  92. Wallace TL, Porter RHP. Targeting the nicotinic alpha7 acetylcholine receptor to enhance cognition in disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:891–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Mortimer AM. Cognitive function in schizophrenia—do neuroleptics make a difference? Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;56:789–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shimizu S, Mizuguchi Y, Ohno Y. Improving the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Role of 5-HT Receptors in Modulating Cognitive and Extrapyramidal Motor Functions. CNS Neurol Disord-Dr. 2013;12:861–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Passchier J, van Waarde A. Visualisation of serotonin-1A (5-HT 1A) receptors in the central nervous system. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:113–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Akimova E, Lanzenberger R, Kasper S. The serotonin-1A receptor in anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiat. 2009;66:627–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Savitz J, Lucki I, Drevets WC. 5-HT1A receptor function in major depressive disorder. Prog Neurobiol. 2009;88:17–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Gray JA, Roth BL. Molecular targets for treating cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:1100–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Singh S, Khanna D, Kalra S. Role of neurochemicals in schizophrenia. Curr Psychopharmacol. 2020;9:144–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Greene AS, Gao SY, Scheinost D, Constable RT. Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits. Nat Commun. 2018;9.

  101. Sarpal DK, Argyelan M, Robinson DG, Szeszko PR, Karlsgodt KH, John M, et al. Baseline Striatal Functional Connectivity as a Predictor of Response to Antipsychotic Drug Treatment. Am J Psychiat. 2016;173:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Paul T, See JW, Vijayakumar V, Njideaka-Kevin T, Loh H, Lee VJQ, et al. Neurostructural changes in schizophrenia and treatment-resistance: a narrative review. Psychoradiology. 2024;4.

  103. Gell M, Eickhoff SB, Omidvarnia A, Küppers V, Patil KR, Satterthwaite TD, et al. How measurement noise limits the accuracy of brain-behaviour predictions. Nat Commun. 2024;15:10678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82201658 & No. 82371506 [to J.C.]), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (24QA2704700 [to J.C.]), the STI2030-Major Projects (No. 2022ZD0214000 [to J.C.]), and the German Center for Mental Health (to T.N.-J.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C. and Y.L. conceptualized the study and designed the research. J.C., Y.L., and S.B.E interpreted the results and provided critical revisions of the manuscript. Z.H., W.H., W.W., and Z.C. analyzed the data and made figures; Z.H. and J.C. wrote the original draft. X.L. provided striatal parcellation atlases. T.N.J., B.D., L.K., R.J., O.G., A.A., I.E.S., provided the data. J.D., W.L., J.T.B., A.J.H., F.H., K.R.P., and Y.L. provided guidance on result interpretation and edited the paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunrong Lu or Ji Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Z., He, W., Chen, Z. et al. Intrinsic connectivity patterns of striatal subfields predict individual dimensions of psychopathology and are associated with cholinergic and serotonergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol. 51, 956–967 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-026-02354-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-026-02354-w

Search

Quick links