Table 2 Primary and secondary clinical outcomes and compliance measures.

From: Role of feeding strategy bundle with acid-suppressive therapy in infants with esophageal acid reflux exposure: a randomized controlled trial

Primary outcome (intent-to-treat analysis)

Overall

(N = 76)

Conventional

(N = 36)

Study

(N = 40)

P value

A priori clinical outcome, Success, N (%)

29 (38)

16 (44)

13 (33)

0.28

Secondary outcomes

Overall

(N = 72)

Conventional

(N = 35)

Study

(N = 37)

P value

I-GERQ-R decrease by 6—N (%)

24/65 (37)

11/31 (35)

13/34 (38)

0.82

Feeding outcome at Time-2—N (%)

   

0.26

  PO

51 (71)

27 (77)

24 (65)

 

  Transition (PO + Tube)

18 (25)

8 (23)

10 (27)

 

  Tube

3 (4)

0 (0)

3 (8)

 

Length of hospital stay—days

108 [82–129]

108 [83–125]

98 [81–132]

0.89

Hospital stay inception to discharge—days

25 [11–45]

23 [3–39]

27 [16–47]

0.26

Weight growth velocity (GV)—g/day

27.1 (9.4)

26.5 (7.2)

27.6 (11.1)

0.64

Length GV—cm/daya

0.1 (0.1)

0.1 (0.1)

0.1 (0.1)

0.88

Head circumference GV—cm/daya

0.1 [0.0–0.1]

0.1 [0.0–0.1]

0.1 [0.0–0.1]

0.87

Feeding method at discharge—N (%)

   

0.32

  PO

54 (75)

29 (83)

25 (68)

 

  Transition (PO + Tube)

14 (19)

5 (14)

9 (24)

 

  Tube

4 (6)

1 (3)

3 (8)

 

Oxygen requirement at discharge—N (%)

16 (22)

9 (26)

7 (19)

0.49

Compliance to feeding methods

 Total Fluid Volume (TFV)

   TFV at inception—#

N/A

150 [147, 152]

150 [149, 156]

0.8

   TFV at time-2—#

N/A

143 [134, 148]a

133 [126, 137]a

<0.001

   # days TFV < 140/kg/d

N/A

10 [2, 26]

22 [11, 31]

0.005

   TFV compliance (TFV < 140/kg/d for >75% of time)

N/A

9 (26)

27 (73)

<0.001

 Position

   Feeding position, RSL, %

N/A

5 [1, 17]

78 [12, 94]

<0.001

   Feeding in RSL > 75% of the time, %

N/A

0 (0)

21 (57)

<0.001

   Supine position postprandial, %

N/A

50 [40, 66]

87 [74, 96]

<0.001

   Supine position postprandial > 75% of the time, %

N/A

7/34 (21)

27/36 (75)

<0.001

 Feeding duration

   % time feed duration >30 min, %

N/A

4 [0, 37]

15 [0, 69]

0.15

   Feeding duration at inception, min

N/A

23 [17, 41]

30 [19, 34]

0.64

   Feeding duration at Time-2, min

N/A

23 [19, 28]

26 [20, 30]

0.15

Long-term follow-upb

 Feeding method at 6 months—N (%)

   

0.65

   PO

36/50 (72)

21/27 (78)

15/23 (65)

 

   Transition (PO + Tube)

10/50 (20)

4/27 (15)

6/23 (26)

 

   Tube

4/50 (8)

2/27 (7)

2/23 (9)

 

 Feeding method at 1 year—N (%)

   

0.11

   PO

37/44 (84)

20/22 (91)

17/22 (77)

 

   Transition (PO + Tube)

4/44 (9)

0/22 (0)

4/22 (18)

 

   Tube

3/44 (7)

2/22 (9)

1/22 (5)

 

 CCA BSID-III

   Cognitive Score <80—N (%)

9/44 (21)

5/23 (22)

4/21 (19)

1.00

   Cognitive Score—#

95 [90–105]

100 [90–105]

90 [90–100]

0.11

   Receptive Communication <80—N (%)

14/42 (33)

8/23 (35)

6/19 (32)

0.83

   Receptive Communication Score—#

90 [77–103]

91 [74–103]

89 [77–103]

0.75

   Expressive Communication <80—N (%)

11/25 (44)

7/14 (50)

4/11 (36)

0.69

   Expressive Communication Score—#

86 [71–100]

81 [71–94]

89 [71–103]

0.66

   Fine Motor <80—N (%)

11/41 (27)

5/23 (22)

6/18 (33)

0.49

   Fine Motor Score—#

94 [79–103]

97 [82–110]

88 [70–97]

0.13

  1. Data presented as N (%), median [IQR], or mean (SD).
  2. aOne value missing from both conventional and study groups.
  3. bData were not available for all subjects for long-term follow-up outcomes, N values are reported.