Table 1 Comparison of viral vectors

From: Viral vectored vaccines: design, development, preventive and therapeutic applications in human diseases

Vector

Type of virus(kb)

Genome size(kb)

Genome type

Cargo capacity(kb)

Predominant immune response

Administration route

Strengths

Weaknesses

References

Vesicular stomatitis virus

Enveloped, RNA

~11

Single stranded, negative‐sense, nonsegmented

~6

Humoral and cellular immune response

IM, IN, or OR

No concerns of virulence reversion, residual virulence or virus recombination; small and easily manipulated genome; stable expression of foreign genes; rapid replication and high growth titer

Safety concerns

514

Rabies virus

Enveloped, RNA

~12

Single stranded, negative‐sense, nonsegmented

~6.5

Humoral response in dominant

IM or OR

Small and easily manipulated genome; design as inactivated bivalent vaccines

A potential risk for reversion to virulence; less well immunogenicity than VSV vector

515,516

Parainfluenza virus

Enveloped, RNA

~15

Single-stranded negative-sense, nonsegmented

~4

Humoral, cellular and mucosal immune response

IM, IN, or OR

Ideal for paediatric and respiratory diseases; safe; genomic stability

Anti-vector immunity; Safety concerns

44

Measles virus

Enveloped, RNA

~16

Single-stranded negative-sense, nonsegmented

~6

Humoral, cellular and mucosal immune response

IM, IP or SC

Licensed live-attenuated measles vaccines are effective and safe; lack of genomic integration in the host; established manufacturing infrastructure

Limited challenge models; low viral titers

378,517,518,519

Newcastle disease virus

Enveloped, RNA

~15

Single-stranded negative-sense, nonsegmented

~4

Humoral and cellular immune response

IM,IN

High growth titers; lack of genomic integration in the host; host restriction; no pre-existing antibody to NDV in the human

Less well immunogenic than other paramyxovirus vector-based vaccines

210

Lentivirus

Enveloped, RNA

~9.2

Single-stranded positive-sense, nonsegmented

~4

Humoral and cellular immune response

IM,IN

Low anti-vector immunity; less integration into the host genome; Durable immune responses

Safety concerns; potential batch to batch variation in manufacturing

8

Influenza virus

Enveloped, RNA

~13.5(total), 0.89–2.3 kb per each segment

Single stranded, negative‐sense, segmented

<1.5

Humoral and cellular immune response

IM, IN

A broad host range; easily manipulated genome; highly attenuated; established manufacturing infrastructure

Limited transgene ability; genetic reassortment; safety concerns

520,521,522

Adenovirus

Non-enveloped, DNA

26–45

Double-stranded, nonsegmented

~7.5

Humoral and cellular immune response

IM, IN, or OR

Well-established; high transduction efficiencies; relative large capacities for transgenes; high titer of production

Anti-vector immunity

523

Poxvirus

Enveloped, DNA

130–300

Double-stranded, nonsegmented

~25

Low/moderate antibodies response and strong cellular immune response

IM

Packing flexibility of the genome; without genomic integration in the host; expressing VLPs

Existence of the viral immunomodulatory genes

8,524

  1. IM intramuscular, IN intranasal, OR oral, IP intraperitoneal, SC subcutaneous, VLPs virus like particles, VSV Vesicular stomatitis virus