Fig. 1 | Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Fig. 1

From: SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific TFH cells exhibit unique responses in infected and vaccinated individuals

Fig. 1The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Longitudinal analysis of TFH cell and subset responses in COVID-19 convalescents. a Timeline of blood sample collection from COVID-19 convalescents. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of days of sampling and number of samples are shown for each time point. b Representative flow plots of spike-specific TFH cells (CD154+) upon BSA or spike protein stimulation. c Spike-specific TFH cell, CXCR3+ TFH cell, and CXCR3 TFH cell responses in COVID-19 convalescents at 2 months (n = 18), 5 months (n = 17), 8 months (n = 18), 12 months (n = 19), and 24 months (n = 5) after illness onset as well as in healthy controls (n = 14), upon stimulation. Paired t test was used to analyze the differences between the responses to BSA and spike protein stimulation. d Kinetics of spike-specific TFH cell, CXCR3+ TFH cell, and CXCR3 TFH cell responses (data presented with background subtracted; responses below background are shown as 0.001%) in COVID-19 convalescents at 2 months (n = 18), 5 months (n = 17), 8 months (n = 18), 12 months (n = 19), and 24 months (n = 5) after illness onset. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze differences between the indicated time points. For (c, d), *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. P < 0.05 was considered to be a two-tailed significant difference, ns, not significant. e Percentage of spike-specific TFH cell, CXCR3+ TFH cell, and CXCR3 TFH cell responders (stimulation index > 2 was considered to be a positive response) among COVID-19 convalescents at 2 months (n = 18), 5 months (n = 17), 8 months (n = 18), 12 months (n = 19), and 24 months (n = 5) after illness onset

Back to article page