Table 1 Comparison of two major phase III studies of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC immunotherapy

From: Dual-immunotherapy triumphs: redefining deficient mismatch repair or high microsatellite instability metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment

 

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (CheckMate 8HW, First Line)1,3

Pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE 177, First Line)

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (CheckMate 8HW, All Line)2

Nivolumab (CheckMate 8HW, All Line)

Efficacy

PFS

54.1 (54.1 - NE)a

16.5 (5.4–38.1)a

NR (53.8 - NE)

39.3 (22.1 - NE)

 12 m PFS

79% (72–84)

55.3% (47.0–62.9)

76% (71–80)

63% (57–68)

 24 m PFS

74% (67–80)a

48.3% (39.9–56.2)

71% (65–76)

56% (49–61)

 36 m PFS

69% (61–76)a

42.3% (34.0–50.4)

68% (62–73)

51% (45–57)

OS

-

NR (49.2 - NE)

-

-

ORR

-

45.1% (37.1–53.3)

71% (65–76)

58% (52–64)

 CR rate

-

13.1%

30%

28%

 PD rate

-

29.4%

10%

19%

Special subgroup (HR)b

versus chemotherapy

versus chemotherapy

  

Overall

HR: 0.21 (0.14–0.31)a

HR: 0.60 (0.45–0.80)

HR: 0.63 (0.49–0.82)

Wide type BRAF/RAS

-

HR: 0.44 (0.29–0.67)

HR: 0.64 (0.39–1.06)

KRAS / NRAS mutation

HR: 0.24 (0.09–0.63)

HR: 1.19 (0.68–2.07)

HR: 0.76 (0.44–1.31)

BRAF V600E

-

HR: 0.50 (0.31–0.80)

HR: 0.62 (0.39–0.97)

Liver metastases

HR: 0.11 (0.05–0.25)

-

HR: 0.68 (0.44 -1.03)

Lung metastases

-

-

-

 

Peritoneal metastases

HR: 0.19 (0.10–0.34)

-

HR: 0.55 (0.37–0.82)

 

Lynch syndrome

-

-

HR: 0.90 (0.47–1.72)

 
  1. aThe latest data is recorded
  2. bThe HR value for PFS was presented
  3. All parentheses indicate the 95% confidence interval. PFS progression free survival, OS overall survival, ORR objective response rate, CR complete response, PD progressive disease, HR hazard ratio, NE not estimable, NR not reached