Table 1 SWE for patient participants, physiotherapist participants for each scenario in the survey and combined SWE for physiotherapist participants.

From: Using the benefit-harm trade-off method to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of intensive motor training on strength for people with spinal cord injury

 

20 percentile (estimate and 95% CI)

50 percentile (estimate and 95% CI)

80 percentile (estimate and 95% CI)

Median (IQR)

SWE for patient participants (n = 40)

1 (1–1)

3 (1–5)

6 (5–15)

3 (1–5)

SWE for patient participants (n = 38)a

1 (1–1)

3 (1–5)

5 (5–11)

3 (1–5)

SWE for physiotherapist participants (n = 37)

 

Case Study 1: Person with C5 AIS C SCI and TMS 25/100 (n = 37)

7 (5–10)

10 (10–15)

20 (15–30)

10 (9–20)

Case Study 2: Person with T7 AIS C SCI and TMS 62/100 (n = 37)

8 (5–8)

9 (8–10)

13 (10–18)

9 (8–13)

Case Study 3: Person with L2 AIS D SCI and TMS 78/100 (n = 37)

5 (4–7)

7 (7–8)

10 (8–12)

7 (5–10)

Case Study 4: Person with C5 AIS A SCI and TMS 13/100 (n = 37)

4 (2–6)

12 (6–12)

17 (12–22)

12 (5–13)

Case Study 5: Person with T2 AIS C SCI and TMS 54/100 (n = 37)

5 (3–6)

9 (6–11)

12 (11–20)

9 (6–11)

Combined SWE for physiotherapist participants (n = 37)

 

9 (7–13)

  1. aAnalysis repeated with the scores of the 2 participants who stated they would never do the intervention removed.