Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Psychosocial impact and anxiety determinants in individuals with spinal cord injury following the april 2025 istanbul earthquake: perceptions of safety and early post-disaster experience

Spinal Cord volume 63, pages 599–606 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Study design

A cross sectional study.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the earthquake experiences, perceived safety, and psychological impact—specifically anxiety and post-traumatic stress levels—among individuals with SCI following the 6.2-magnitude Istanbul earthquake on April 23, 2025.

Setting

A tertiary referral hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, where hospitalized and community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) were evaluated on the fifth day following the April 2025 earthquake.

Methods

A total of 64 participants, including hospitalized SCI patients (n = 19), community-dwelling SCI patients (n = 22), and able-bodied controls (n = 23), were evaluated within five days of the disaster. Demographic data, housing characteristics, and disaster experiences were recorded. Psychological assessment included the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and a 10-item perceived safety scale.

Results

SCI participants had significantly higher BAI scores compared to able-bodied individuals (p < 0.05). Hospitalized SCI patients reported lower anxiety levels than their community-dwelling counterparts. No significant differences were found regarding mobility level, location (European vs. Asian side), building age, or number of floors. A strong correlation was observed between anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms (r = 0.770, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Given the low participant numbers, our data suggests that SCI individuals may be more psychologically affected by earthquakes than able-bodied peers, regardless of functional independence or physical environment. Hospitalization during disaster may offer protective psychological benefits. These findings highlight the importance of integrating psychosocial support and tailored disaster preparedness strategies for individuals with SCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Singh A, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:309–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Post MW, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:382–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh L, Subbarao I, Gebbie K, Schor KW, Lyznicki J, Strauss-Riggs K, et al. Core competencies for disaster medicine and public health. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattarai M, Maneewat K, Sae-Sia W. Psychosocial factors affecting resilience in nepalese individuals with earthquake-related spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mikolajczyk, Draganich B, Philippus C, Goldstein A, Erin Andrews R, Pilarski C, et al. Resilience and mental health in individuals with spinal cord injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:1261–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig A, Tran Y, Middleton J, Cameron I. Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:650–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Groves C, Poudel M, Baniya M, Rana C, House D. Descriptive study of earthquake-related spinal cord injury in Nepal. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:705–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raissi G, Mokhtari A, Mansouri K. Reports from spinal cord injury patients: eight months after the 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:912–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rathore MF, Rashid P, Butt AW, Malik AA, Gill ZA, Haig AJ. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in the 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:658–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Reinhardt JD, Gosney JE, Zhang X, Hu X, Chen S, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes of physical rehabilitation and medical complications in spinal cord injury victims of the sichuan earthquake. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:534–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rathore MF, Farooq F, Muzammil S, New PW, Ahmad N, Haig AJ. Spinal cord injury management and rehabilitation: highlights and shortcomings from the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:579–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss DS. The impact of event scale: revised. In: Wilson JP, Tang CS, editors. Cross-cultural assessment of psychological trauma and PTSD. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2007:219–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Stough LM, Kang D, Lee C. The SEND Project: engaging students with disabilities in emergency preparedness. J Emerg Manag. 2016;14:259–69.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:255–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonanno GA, Brewin CR, Kaniasty K, Greca AM. Weighing the costs of disaster: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2010;11:1–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC. Psychological factors and quality of life after spinal cord injury: a review of literature. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:78–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Norris FH, Friedman MJ, Watson PJ. 60,000 disaster victims speak: part II. summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry. 2002;65:240–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tate DG, Forchheimer MB, Krause JS. Psychological health and resilience in people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review of the literature. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35:99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peter C, Müller R, Cieza A. Determinants of quality of life in people with spinal cord injury: a review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:587–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan RCK, Lee TMC, Lieh-Mak F. Cognitive and emotional disturbances after spinal cord injury: a review of recent literature. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:1064–81.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peter C, Müller R, Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC. Impact of physical and psychosocial factors on functioning in persons with spinal cord injury in the Netherlands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1023–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tartakovsky E. Psychological well-being and social support among immigrants from the former soviet union in Israel. Int J Psychol. 2016;51:325–33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:510–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Çam ve Sakura City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ümit Yalçın, Fatih Bağcıer, Pınar Öztop Çiftkaya, Burcu Çınar, Ali Kaan Öztürk, Esra Nur Güçlü, Burcu Hazer & Evrim Coşkun

  2. Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey

    Burak Tayyip Dede

Authors
  1. Ümit Yalçın
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatih Bağcıer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pınar Öztop Çiftkaya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Burcu Çınar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Kaan Öztürk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Esra Nur Güçlü
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Burak Tayyip Dede
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Burcu Hazer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Evrim Coşkun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to the study; ÜY Conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the manuscript. FB Contributed to study design and critically revised the manuscript. PÖÇ Assisted in study design and data interpretation. BÇ Collected patients’ data. AKÖ Collected patients’ data. ENG Collected patients’ data. BTD Performed statistical analyses. BH Provided study supervision and critical revision of the manuscript. EC: Provided study supervision and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ümit Yalçın.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital (approval number: 2025 / 160). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation in the study. The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yalçın, Ü., Bağcıer, F., Çiftkaya, P.Ö. et al. Psychosocial impact and anxiety determinants in individuals with spinal cord injury following the april 2025 istanbul earthquake: perceptions of safety and early post-disaster experience. Spinal Cord 63, 599–606 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01122-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01122-9

Search

Advanced search

Quick links