Table 1 GRIPP2 Short forma.
Section & Topic | Item | Details | Pg. no. |
|---|---|---|---|
1. Aim | Report the aim of PPI in the study | To describe how engaging people with the lived experience of SCI could refine the scope, tone, and content of the MHM | Pg. 4 |
2. Methods | Provide a clear description of the methods used for PPI in the study | An expert informant group of individuals with the lived experience of SCI reviewed then discussed MHM via two focus groups. | Pg. 5 |
3. Study results | Outcomes—Report the results of PPI in the study, including both positive and negative outcomes | Four themes: Mental health is front and centre; Striking the right balance; The glass is half full and Variety’s the spice of life were interpreted to summarise how the engagement of people with the lived experience focused more emphasis on strengths-based orientation without dismissing acknowledgement of the serious and severe outcomes of MH. | Pg. 6 |
4. Discussion and conclusions | Outcomes—Comment on the extent to which PPI influenced the study overall. Describe positive and negative effects | Lived experience engagement ensured the MHM was evidenced based, but also and useable, acceptable and appropriate for people with SCI. | Pg. 10 |
5. Reflections/critical perspective | Comment critically on the study, reflecting on the things that went well and those that did not, so others can learn from this experience | Engaging lived experience perspectives was instrumental in ensuring the MHM addressed authentic concerns and was not just constructed by people without such direct experience, however well- intentioned such people might be. | Pg. 11 |
