Abstract
Study Design
Forward and backward translation processes were conducted first, followed by cognitive interviews for validation within a cross-sectional study design.
Objective
To translate the second edition (2021) of the International Standards to document Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) from English to Japanese using established translation guidelines.
Setting
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington. Cognitive interviews were conducted in person or via secure video conferencing.
Methods
The second edition (2021) of the ISAFSCI was translated into Japanese by two groups of bilingual Japanese healthcare professionals, and then back translated to English independently. After iterative review and confirmation by the developer, a pre-final version was created. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 15 Japanese healthcare professionals practicing spinal cord injury (SCI) care.
Results
All aspects of the ISAFSCI were translated including survey items (n = 114) and instructional items (n = 111). During back-translation, 10.7% of items showed language discrepancies. These were resolved through a second round of expert committee review and developer evaluation. Cognitive interviews revealed that most items were well understood. Modifications (n = 19) were required to clarify expressions related to autonomic function and anatomical terminology.
Conclusion
Following a rigorous translation process, the Japanese version of the second ISAFSCI edition 2021 demonstrated linguistic clarity, cultural relevance, and broad comprehensibility among Japanese healthcare professionals. In addition to its clinical and research utility, this survey could address the knowledge gap about autonomic dysfunction after SCI by promoting awareness and education in the Japanese healthcare community.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Contemporary cardiovascular concerns after spinal cord injury: mechanisms, maladaptations, and management. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:1927–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3903
Krassioukov A. Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009;169:157–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2009.08.003
Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, Garrison A, Tun CG, Gagnon D, et al. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:408–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101729
Priebe MM, Chiodo AE, Scelza WM, Kirshblum SC, Wuermser L-A, Ho CH. Spinal cord injury medicine. 6. economic and societal issues in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:S84–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.005
Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1371–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371
Alexander MS, Biering-Sorensen F, Bodner D, Brackett NL, Cardenas D, Charlifue S, et al. International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.121
Krassioukov A, Biering-Sørensen F, Donovan W, Kennelly M, Kirshblum S, Krogh K, et al. International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:201–10. https://doi.org/10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053
Wecht JM, Krassioukov AV, Alexander M, Handrakis JP, McKenna SL, Kennelly M, et al. International standards to document autonomic function following SCI (ISAFSCI). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021;27:23–49. https://doi.org/10.46292/sci2702-23
Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:S124–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:212–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275342
Brouwers EMJR, Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Hosman AF, van de Meent H, Bartels RHMA. Dutch-Flemish translation and cross-cultural adaption of the spinal cord injury-quality of life (SCI-QOL) short forms. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:1349–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07190-2
Correia H, Pérez B, Arnold B, Wong AWK, Lai J, Kallen M, et al. Spanish translation and linguistic validation of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) measurement system. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:753–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0786-5
Balkman GS, Samejima S, Fujimoto K, Hafner BJ. Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the prosthetic limb users survey of mobility (PLUS-M). Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000059
Rupp R, Biering-Sørensen F, Burns SP, Graves DE, Guest J, Jones L, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021;27:1–22. https://doi.org/10.46292/sci2702-1
Krassioukov A, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Kennelly M, Kirshblum S, Krogh K, et al. International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury (ISAFSCI), first edition 2012. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012;18:283–96. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1803-282
Behr D, Dept S, Krajčeva E. Documenting the survey translation and monitoring process. Advances in Comparative Survey Methods, Wiley; 2018, p. 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch16
Almohaya HS, Bakhsh HR, Bin Sheeha B, Aldhahi MI, Alhasani R. Translation and cultural adaptation into arabic of patient-reported outcome measurement information system® item banks: cognitive function abilities and physical function for samples with mobility aid users. Healthcare. 2024;12:211 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020211
Koller M, Kantzer V, Mear I, Zarzar K, Martin M, Greimel E, et al. The process of reconciliation: evaluation of guidelines for translating quality-of-life questionnaires. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12:189–97. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.102
Reeve BB, McFatrich M, Pinheiro LC, Weaver MS, Sung L, Withycombe JS, et al. Eliciting the child’s voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: cognitive interview findings from the pediatric patient‐reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events initiative. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017;64:e26261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26261.
Priede C, Farrall S. Comparing results from different styles of cognitive interviewing: ‘verbal probing’ vs. ‘thinking aloud. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2011;14:271–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.523187
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:175–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x
Fry AJ, Nguyen T. Culture and the self: implications for the perception of depression by Australian and Vietnamese nursing students. J Adv Nurs. 1996;23:1147–54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.13511.x
Currie KD, Wong SC, Warburton DE, Krassioukov AV. Reliability of the sit-up test in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:563–6. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000004
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Calaresu FR. Introduction: autonomic preganglionic neurons-the final common pathway of physiological regulations. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1982;5:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1838(82)90085-6
Kandel ER, Koester JD, Mack SH, Siegelbaum SA. Principles of Neural Science. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2021.
Ministry of Health L and W. The 60th National Examination for Physical Therapists: Questions and Answer Key. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 2025.
NEURO2024 Organizing Committee. NEURO2024 Program, NEURO2024; 2024.
Wehrwein EA, Orer HS, Barman SM. Overview of the anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system. Compr Physiol, Wiley; 2016, p. 1239–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150037
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Japan Medical Society of Spinal Cord Lesion and Dr. Masaya Nakamura, the president of the society, for the entire support and collaboration with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). We would also like to thank Drs. Hiroki Okawara and Tomonori Sawada, the Keio University School of Medicine for the initiation of this study. Furthermore, we extend our sincere appreciation to the ASIA for their endorsement and continued efforts in promoting the international standardization of autonomic function assessment following SCI.
Funding
SS is supported by the Wings for Life Spinal Cord Research Foundation, Foundation for Physical Therapy Research, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Mission Yogurt Fund, and Morton Cure Paralysis Fund. RN is supported by Nakatomi Foundation, Foundation for Physical Therapy Research, and Craig H Neilsen Foundation. AVK holds Patrik Reid Endowed Chair in Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Research, University of British Columbia, and his lab is supported by funds from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Canada Foundation for Innovation and BC Knowledge Development Fund, International Spinal Research Trust, Rick Hansen Foundation, PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Wings for Life Research Foundation, and US Department of Defense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, RN and SS; Data collection, RN, YT, TK, and SS; Translation process, HM, HS, NA, TY, YB, M.K., and AVK; Data analysis, RN; Writing of the original draft manuscript and creation of figures, RN and SS; Manuscript review and editing, RN, YT, TK, HM, HS, NA, TY, YB, MK, CS, AVK, and SS; Supervision, SS All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The project was approved by the University of Washington Human Subjects Division [Approval number; STUDY00022450]. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakahara, R., Tanaka, Y., Kojima, K. et al. Translation and linguistic validation of the international standards to document autonomic function following spinal cord injury (ISAFSCI) for Japanese healthcare professionals. Spinal Cord 64, 258–265 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-026-01173-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-026-01173-6

