Abstract
Study design
A prospective observational study.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of closed reduction of cervical spine injuries (CSIs) using cervical traction and identify probable complications.
Setting
Department of Neurological Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Methods
Consecutive CSIs managed by closed reduction using Gardener–Well’s Tongs traction were prospectively analysed. The data included imaging and neurological examinations findings, Frankel grading, and extent of reduction. Reduction of 95% or more was deemed satisfactory. The primary outcome measures were extent/degree of reduction and neurologic status classified as improved, same, or worse. Other complications were taken as secondary outcome measures.
Result
Seventy-four patients, 49 males, mean age 35.2 years (SD 9.7) were included. In all, 78.4% presented within 72 hours of injury. In total, 85.1% had road traffic crashes. Anterior subluxation was seen in 86.5%. The degree of displacement was <25% in 36/74 (48.6%), 25–50% in 19/74 (25.7%), 50–75% in 8/74 (10.8%), and >75% in 11/74 (14.9%). Traction reduction was done after 7 days of injury in 52.7% and same day of injury in 1.4%. Reduction weight ranged from 2 kg to 60 kg. Reduction was satisfactory in 67.6% and failed in 32.4%. In all, 81.1% of patients remained neurologically the same, while 18.9% improved. Causes of failed reduction were facet lock (15), old injury (8), new-onset/worsening pain (3), and over-distraction (2). Complications of closed reduction were over-distraction (5), tong pull-out (2), new-onset/worsening pain (2), and skull perforation (1).
Conclusions
Satisfactory closed reduction is feasible in patients with CSI and significant malalignment. The method is associated with few complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Drake CG. Cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg. 1962;19:487–94.
Hadley MN, Fitzpatrick BC, Sonntang VKH, Browner CM. Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:661–6.
Torretti JA, Sengupta DK. Cervical spine trauma. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41:255–67.
Grant GA, Mirza SK, Chapman JR, Winn HR, Newell DW, Jones DT, et al. Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg (Spine). 1999;90:13–8.
AANS/CNS Section on Spine and Peripheral Nerves. Initial closed reduction of cervical spine fracture-dislocation injuries. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:S44–S50.
Gallie WE. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg. 1939;XLVI:495–9.
Lee JY, Nassr A, Eck JC, Vaccaro AR. Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocation. Spine J. 2009;9:418–23.
Robertson PA, Ryan MD. Neurological deterioration after reduction of cervical subluxation. J Bone Jt Surg (Br). 1992;74-B:224–7.
Abel R. Surgery for spinal injury with neurologic deficit: a matter of opinion?. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4:16 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-018-0048-9.
El Masri(y) WS. Traumatic spinal injury and spinal cord injury: point for active physiological conservative management as compared to surgical management. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4:14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-018-0045-z.
Evans DK. Reduction of cervical dislocations. J Bone Jt Surg (Br). 1961;43-B:552–5.
Lee AS, MacLean JCB, Newton DA. Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations. J Bone Jt Surg (Br). 1994;76-B:352–6.
Darsaut TE, Ashforth R, Bhargava R, Broad R, Emery D, Kortbeek F, et al. A pilot study of magnetic resonance imaging-guided closed reduction of cervical spine fractures. Spine. 2006;31:2085–90.
Gallie WE. Skeletal traction in the treatment of fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Ann Surg. 1937;106:770–6.
Kleyn PJ. Dislocations of the cervical spine: closed reduction under anaesthesia. Paraplegia. 1984;22:271–81.
Kyoshima K, Kakizawa Y, Tokushige K. Simple cervical spine traction using a Halo vest apparatus: technical note. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:518–21.
Ludwig SC, Vaccaro AR, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Immediate quadriparesis after manipulation for bilateral cervical facet subluxation. J Bone Jt Surg (Am). 1997;79-A:587–90.
du Toit AB, Dunn R. Bifacet dislocations of the cervical spine: acute management and outcome. SA Ortho J. 2008;30–6.
Emejulu JKC, Ekweogwu OC. Outcome of spinal cord injuries management in a centre without modern imaging facilities. West Afr J Med. 2009;28:376–9.
Eyichukwu GO, Anyaehie UC, Moghalu ON. Pattern and outcome of management for traumatic closed cervical spine injuries at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Nig Health J. 2011;11:27–31.
Nizare EF, Abdellah B, Fahd DH, Yassad OM, Rachid G, Rachid EM, et al. Upper cervical spine injuries: a management of a series of 70 cases. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15:57.
Uche EO, Nwankwo OE, Okorie E, Nnezianya I. Cervical spine injury: a 10-year multicenter analysis of evolution of care and risk factors for poor outcome in South-East Nigeria. Nig J Clin Pract. 2015;18:203–8.
Uche EO, Nwankwo OE, Okorie E, Muobike A. Skull traction for cervical spine injury in Enugu: a 5-year retrospective multicenter analysis of the clinical outcomes of patients treated with two common devices. Nig J Clin Pract. 2016;19:580–4.
Hofmeister M, Jaksche H, Potulski M, Buhren V. Treatment of cervical spine injuries. Osteo Trauma Care. 2003;11:166–76.
Mahale YJ, Silver JR, Henderson NJ. Neurological complications of the reduction of cervical spine dislocations. J Bone Jt Surg (Br). 1993;75-B:403–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adeolu, A.A., Ukachukwu, AE.K., Adeolu, J.O. et al. Clinical outcome of closed reduction of cervical spine injuries in a cohort of Nigerians. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 5, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0158-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0158-z
