Abstract
Study design
Prospective study.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and usability of a family member and a clinician completed home evaluation process using an adapted commercial MagicPlan mobile application (MPMA) and laser distance measurer (LDM).
Setting
An acute inpatient rehabilitation unit and homes in the community.
Methods
MPMA allows users to create floor plans (FPs), which may include virtually inserted pieces of durable medical equipment (DME). The MPMA with an LDM allows users to virtually demonstrate that ordered DME will fit within the measured environments. After training with an online educational module, the family member of someone on the acute inpatient unit (lay participant) went home to measure room dimensions and to create FPs using the MPMA and LDM. After completing the task, lay participants returned the FPs for review by clinicians responsible for ordering DME.
Results
Forty-three lay participants and nine clinicians finished the study. Clinicians were satisfied with 75% of the FPs created by the lay participants using version 2 of the educational module. The lay participants and clinicians both thought the MPMA is useful and recommended its use.
Conclusion
The MPMA with an LDM can be used to virtually complete a home evaluation and to evaluate for the appropriateness of various considered DME. The method of performing home evaluations may lead to more appropriate DME recommendations to improve functional independence for individuals with disabilities.
Sponsorship
This work was supported by Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, QOL Sustainable Impact Projects (431146).
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Salminen A-L, Brandt Å, Samuelsson K, Töytäri O, Malmivaara A. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:697–706.
Sund T, Iwarsson S, Anttila H, Brandt Å. Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: a prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. PM R. 2015;7:859–70.
Greer N, Brasure M, Wilt TJ. Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:141–6.
Hammel J, Lai J-S, Heller T. The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:93–105.
Daniel R. L. Most power wheelchairs in the medicare program did not meet medical necessity guidelines. Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-09-00260.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2011.
Leica Geosystems. Owner’s FAQ DISTO E7100i (D110). Leica Geosystems; 2019. https://lasers.leica-geosystems.com/blog/owners-faq-disto-e7100i-d110.
ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Chaper 3: Building Blocks, Section 304: Turning Space. Department of Justice. 2010.
Nielsen J. Usability inspection methods. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: ACM; 1994.
Barnum CM. Usability testing essentials: ready, set… test!. Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2010.
LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol. 2010;22:3–17. quiz 9
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E. et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.
Valdes I, Kibbe DC, Tolleson G, Kunik ME, Petersen LA. Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care. 2004;12:3–9.
Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ. A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:229–34.
Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e40.
Worobey LA, Rigot SK, Hogaboom NS, Venus C, Boninger ML. Investigating the efficacy of web-based transfer training on independent wheelchair transfers through randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:9–16 e0.
Mayer RE. Research-based principles for learning with animation. Learning with animation: research implications for design. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 30–48.
Shem K, Sechrist SJ, Loomis E, Isaac L. SCiPad: effective implementation of telemedicine using iPads with individuals with spinal cord injuries, a case series. Front Med. 2017;4:58.
Gallagher R, Roach K, Sadler L, Glinatsis H, Belshaw J, Kirkness A, et al. Mobile technology use across age groups in patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation: survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5:e161.
Naszay M, Stockinger A, Jungwirth D, Haluza D. Digital age and the public eHealth perspective: prevailing health app use among Austrian Internet users. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018;43:390–400.
Lella A, Lipsman A. The 2017 U.S. mobile app report. Reston, VA, USA: comScore, Inc; 2017.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge all the occupational and physical therapists and research coordinators, Andrew Delgado and Kristell Taylor, in the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance at the Mount Sinai Hospital for helping conduct this study. This work was supported by Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, QOL Sustainable Impact Projects (431146).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors listed above have met all of the following authorship criteria: (1) Conceived and/or designed the work that led to the submission, acquired data, and/or played an important role in interpreting the results. (2) Drafted or revised the manuscript. (3) Approved the final version. (4) Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsai, CY., Miller, A.S., Huang, V. et al. The feasibility and usability of a mobile application for performing home evaluations. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 5, 76 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0219-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0219-3
This article is cited by
-
A virtual reality-based pre-discharge home assessment for inpatient rehabilitation: co-creation, feasibility and user perception
BMC Digital Health (2025)
-
Sustainability and spinal cord injury: attending to climate change and disability
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2019)
