Abstract
Study design
Cross-sectional study.
Objectives
Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is frequent among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and is often difficult to treat. A bowel stoma is considered the last-resort treatment option for individuals with SCI and severe NBD. This study aims to explore whether individuals are satisfied with their bowel stoma and how they feel about the timing of stoma formation. Furthermore, we want to explore side effects addressing diversion colitis and changes in quality of life (QOL) after stoma formation.
Setting
Netherlands, community.
Methods
We included participants aged at least 18 years with a traumatic or non-traumatic SCI and bowel stoma. Questions regarding timing of stoma formation, alterations in QOL after stoma formation and experienced side effects of the bowel stoma were addressed in an online questionnaire.
Results
In total 23 participants filled out the online survey. Twenty-two participants (96%) were satisfied with their bowel stoma and 83% felt their stoma was placed too late or far too late. The large majority (>80%) reported improvements in the four QOL domains after the procedure. Nine participants reported stoma-related problems in the last month. In the last three months, seven participants (30%) reported to have diversion colitis. Four of these seven participants experienced this at least once a week or more. Two participants stated this had moderate influence on daily activities.
Conclusions
Most participants with SCI experienced improvement in QOL and in retrospect wanted their bowel stoma earlier. Early, extensive conversations to inform individuals about bowel stoma as a treatment option is recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Adriaansen JJ, van Asbeck FW, van Kuppevelt D, Snoek GJ, Post MW. Outcomes of neurogenic bowel management in individuals living with a spinal cord injury for at least 10 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:905–12.
Adriaansen JJ, Ruijs LE, van Koppenhagen CF, van Asbeck FW, Snoek GJ, van Kuppevelt D, et al. Secondary health conditions and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury for at least ten years. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:853–60.
Emmanuel A. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction. F1000 Res. 2019;8:1800.
Coggrave M, Norton C, Cody JD. Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev. 2014:CD002115. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub5.
Emmanuel A. Rehabilitation in practice: managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:483–8.
Cooper EA, Bonne Lee B, Muhlmann M. Outcomes following stoma formation in patients with spinal cord injury. Color Dis. 2019;21:1415–20.
Branagan G, Tromans A, Finnis D. Effect of stoma formation on bowel care and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:680–3.
Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Color Dis. 2010;12:958–64.
Tominaga K, Kamimura K, Takahashi K, Yokoyama J, Yamagiwa S, Terai S. Diversion colitis and pouchitis: a mini-review. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:1734–47.
Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, Laurberg S. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:625–31.
Charlifue S, Post MW, Biering-Sørensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, et al. International spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:672–5.
Post MW, Forchheimer MB, Charlifue S, D’Andrea Greve JM, New PW, Tate DG. Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:992–8.
Rosito O, Nino-Murcia M, Wolfe VA, Kiratli BJPI. The effects of colostomy on the quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002;25:174–83.
Bølling Hansen R, Staun M, Kalhauge A, Langholz E, Biering-Sørensen F. Bowel function and quality of life after colostomy in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39:281–9.
Coggrave MJ, Ingram RM, Gardner BP, Norton CS. The impact of stoma for bowel management after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:848–52.
Boucher M, Dukes S, Bryan S, Branagan G. Early colostomy formation can improve independence following spinal cord injury and increase acceptability of bowel management. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019;25:23–30.
Emmanuel A, Krogh K, Kirshblum S, Christensen P, Spinelli M, van Kuppevelt D, et al. Creation and validation of a new tool for the monitoring efficacy of neurogenic bowel dysfunction treatment on response: the MENTOR tool. Spinal Cord. 2020;58:795–802.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank all study participants because without them this work would not be possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Ginkel, F., Post, M.W.M., Faber, W.X.M. et al. Spinal cord injuries and bowel stomas: timing and satisfaction with stoma formation and alterations in quality of life. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 7, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-00377-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-00377-z
