Table 1 List of articles on NMDA antagonists and Parkinson’s disease in PubMed Database (1969–2018)

From: NMDA antagonists for treating the non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease

Study (year)

Drug, dose, duration

Population characteristics

Design

Measures

Findings

Limitations

Bias score

Aarsland et al. (2009)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

PD or LBD

N = 72

Randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled

CGI, MMSE, NPI, UPDRS

CGI score improved in patients given memantine (p = 0.03). Improved speed and global cognition led to the changes in CGI score. MMSE improvement (p = 0.02) although no significant differences in UPDRS and NPI scores.

High patient attrition and lacked adequate statistical power-grouped PD and DLB cohort

2

Wesnes et al. (2014)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

Disrupted episodic memory/cognition

N = 30 PDD

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

multi-center

CDR

Memantine produced statistically significant medium to large effect-sized improvements in attentional performance involving information processing and to verbal episodic recognition memory as evidenced by increased performance in choice reaction time, immediate, and delayed word recognition.

 

2

Emre et al. (2010)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

PD N = 120

Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

ADAS, NPI

NPI did not improve in PD (−1.6 vs. −0.1, respectively, difference of −1.4, p = 0.522) nor with ADAS (p = 0.576).

Small sample size, missing data at some time points

2

Leroi et al. (2009)

Memantine

20 mg/day, 16 weeks

Washout and follow-up after 6 weeks (22-week)

PDD

N = 25

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

NPI, DRS, MMSE

NPI and MMSE changes between memantine and placebo were insignificant (sub-scores not shown).

DRS changes between placebo (100.3) in favor of memantine (94.7).

After washout, memantine group more often had global deterioration (70%) vs. (29%) for placebo.

NPI sub-scores not shown, small sample size, some participants on cholinesterase inhibitors before trial

2

Litvinenko et al. (2008)

Memantine

20 mg/day

12, 24 week assessment

PD

N = 62

Placebo-controlled

ADAS-cog, Verbal Fluency Test, clock-drawing test NPI, FAB, DAD

At 24 weeks, memantine group had significant improvements in ADAS-cog (0.002), FAB (p = 0.01), verbal fluency test (p = 0.01), and clock drawing test (p = 0.03).

NPI improvement with memantine, i.e., disinhibition (p = 0.006), irritability (p = 0.004), anxiety (p = 0.04), and hallucinations (p = 0.048).

No significant changes at 12 weeks.

At 52 weeks, significant improvements in all scales.

Non-randomized, non-blinded

2

Johansson et al. (2010)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

4 week washout

additional 26 week trial

PD and LBD

n = 56

Washout and open label continuation after a double-blind randomized controlled trial

CGIC, presence of recurrence of symptoms upon drug withdrawal

Washout of memantine caused 9% (attrition due to worsening of psychiatric symptoms, i.e., anxiety and depression).

CGIC scores worsened more in the memantine washout group vs. placebo.

Grouped PD and DLB cohort

2

Vidal et al. (2013)

Memantine

20 mg/day

~ 3 months

PD

N = 2

Case report

Global UPDRS (I–III)

Global UPDRS showed improvement following treatment with memantine with the unanticipated improvement in LID and on–off phenomenon. For patient #2 = 4 point improvement in mood/behavior, no change in patient #1.

Small sample size

2

Leroi et al. (2014)

Memantine

20 mg/day

22 weeks

PDD

N = 25

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

GAS,

PDQ-8, Zarit Burden Inventory

A significantly greater proportion of participants on memantine (64%) had better than expected GAS outcomes compared with those on placebo (7%) (p = 0.007). GAS score, as well as mean caregiver burden score, from baseline to drug discontinuation was significantly greater in memantine compared to placebo (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Although significant differences in QOL were not seen, memantine improved individually set goals and caregiver burden in PDD.

Ungeneralizable outcome measures, small sample size, no measure of inter-rater reliability for GAS

2

Larsson et al. (2011)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

PDD or LBD

N = 70

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Caregiver-rated QOL-Alzheimer’s Disease in domains (WHO health classification)

Memantine significantly improved total QOL in both PDD and LBD patients (p = 0.01), memantine had 42% rate higher QOL than at baseline compared to 15% in placebo.

Small sample size, some patient attrition, possible response shift phenomenon

2

Ondo et al. (2011)

Memantine

20 mg/day

8 weeks

PD

N = 40

Double-blind placebo-controlled exploratory pilot trial

UPDRS I–II

ESS,

HAM-D, QOL-39, CGI

No significant change in UPDRS section I or II, Epworth sleepiness scale, fatigue severity scale, Hamilton depression scale, Conner adult inventory, PD Quality of Life-39, or clinical global impressions.

Short time period, only 8-week follow-up

1

Larsson et al. (2010)

Memantine

20 mg/day

24 weeks

PDD and LBD Excessive daytime sleepiness and REM disorder in PDD

N = 20 (PDD + DLB)

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Stavanger sleep questionnaire and ESS

At 24 weeks, patients treated with memantine were less physically active during sleep while patients in the placebo group worsened (p = 0.006). No significant change was observed in severity of excessive daytime sleepiness.

Small sample size, some patient attrition, possible awareness bias due to methodology

2

Pahwa et al. (2015)

Amantadine

ADS‐5102 extended-release (260–420 mg/day)

8 weeks

PD patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesia

N = 83

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multisite study

UPDRS (I–III),

PDQ-39

Insignificant change in UPDRS and QOL/PDQ-9 at week 8 for any dose.

UPDRS I score combined with II–III so effect on mood cannot be determined

Focus was on safety of novel formulation (extended release)

1

Bandini et al. (2002)

Amantadine

100 mg/day/1st week

200 mg/day/2nd week

300 mg/day/3rd week

6 months

PD

N = 23

Cognition and visual response

Open-label cohort study with amantadine monotherapy vs. adjuvant levodopa

Event related P300 (visual discrimination paradigm)

Amantadine alone and as adjuvant to levodopa can significantly improve both the speed of visuo-cognitive processing and shortened latency of visual discrimination (p < 0.05).

Small sample size, non-randomized, single ethnicity (African-American)

2

Parkes et al. (1970)

Amantadine

100 mg/day (2 weeks)

300 mg/day (2 weeks)

500 mg/day (2 weeks)

6 week trial

PD

N = 43

Cohort study

Self-designed motor, sensory and psychological tests, patient report

During trial, 26/43 patients reported improved “mood”, regardless of dose.

Non-randomized, non-placebo-controlled, small sample size, unverified techniques to measure PD symptoms

0

Schwab et al. (1969)

Amantadine

100–200 mg/day

6 months

PD

N = 163

Cohort study without a placebo control

Patient report

20% of patients experienced side effects of increased jitteriness, insomnia, abdominal uneasiness, loss of appetite, and slight subjective dizziness. One patient reported a feeling of depression. 22% of patients experienced insomnia, dizziness, confusion. One patient reported depression after amantadine.

Non-randomized, non-placebo-controlled, no description of how symptoms were quantified following drug administration

1

Sherman et al. (2016)

Ketamine

0.15–0.3 mg/kg/h 50–96 h periods

PD

N = 5

Pain and depression

Case reports

Patient report

Depression and suicidality improved in one depression-positive patient (measure is not stated). However, the patient continued to exhibit mild symptoms of depression in follow-up visits. Pain improved for all five patients: two back pain, two headache and one painful dyskinesia.

Small sample size, multiple unspecified metrics used to measure outcomes

1

Schneider et al. (2000)

D-cycloserine

320, 1000, 8000 µg/kg

Dizocilpine

(10–32 µg/kg)

(single)

MPTP-induced PD primate model

N = 4

Animals served as their own controls with and without treatment

Performance of a variable-delayed-response task

D-cycloserine significantly improved performance of a variable-delayed-response task. No effect at cycloserine 8000 µg/kg or with dizocilpine.

Small sample size, animal model

a

Ho et al. (2011)

D-cycloserine

30 mg/kg/day

100 mg/kg/day

200 mg/kg/day

(13 days)

MPTP-induced PD rat model

Animals served as their own controls

Rotarod test, T-maze, plus-maze

Treatment with D-cycloserine improved deficits in working memory and anxiety-like behavior.

Small sample size, animal model

a

Singh et al. (2017)

Dizocilpine

0.2 mg/kg, ip

6-OHDA-induced PD rat model

anxiety and depression

Experimental

Light chamber (time spent)

social interaction test (anxiety-like behavior)

immobility test (depression)

Dizocilpine-treated rats spent more time in the light chamber (p < 0.01), and more contact time during the social interaction test (p < 0.05) in comparison to 6-OHDA lesioned rats.

Animal model

a

Montastruc et al. (1994)

Dextromethorphan

90–180 mg/day

1 month

PD

n = 10

global symptoms

Open label

UPDRS (I–III)

No significant improvement in UPDRS subscores of extrapyramidal symptoms (partial tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia) mentation, behavior, and mood or daily activity.

Small sample size, specific changes in UPDRS score not provided

a

Quality assessment criteria for selected studies

Score

Method for measuring non-motor symptoms

Trial period

1

Subjective, self-reports by patient or qualitative noting by clinician

Adequate time period

0

Objective measure, either by clinician (UPDRS-1, MMSE, ADAS, etc.) or by caregiver (NPI)

Inadequate time period, less time than average trials for given drug

  1. Abbreviations: ADAS-Cog Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive, CDR clinical dementia rating, CGI clinical global impressions, DAD disability assessment for dementia, ESS Epworth sleepiness scale, FAB frontal assessment battery, GAS goal attainment scaling, HAM-D Hamilton depression rating scale, MMSE mini-mental state examination, PDQ-8/39 Parkinson’s disease questionnaire-8/39-item, NPI neuropsychiatric inventory, and UPDRS unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale
  2. a Bias assessment was not completed with animal studies