Table 2 In the analysis of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1) immunoglobulin G (IgG) status (HSV1 antibody positivity/negativity; HSV1+/HSV1−) on regional cortical volumes among patients with severe mental illness (n = 420), we ran 34 sex-, age- and scanner-adjusted analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) by hemisphere.

From: Herpes simplex virus 1 infection on grey matter and general intelligence in severe mental illness

 

ANCOVAs (HSV1+/HSV1−)

ICV-corrected ANCOVAs

Multiple regressions (HSV1 levels)

 

Direction

p values

q values

Partial eta2

p values

p values

Left regional cortical volumes

 Caudal middle frontal

a

0.0001b

0.005

0.034

0.001

0.003

 Precentral

0.001b

0.017

0.025

0.007

0.003

 Lingual

0.003b

0.034

0.021

0.014

0.002

 Middle temporal

0.005b

0.043

0.019

0.033

0.027

 Banks of superior temporal sulcus

0.007b

0.048

0.017

0.037

0.002

 Supramarginal

0.015

nsc

   

 Postcentral

0.019

ns

   

 Rostral anterior cingulate

0.026

ns

   

 Frontal pole

0.044

ns

   

Right regional cortical volumes

 Lingual

0.007

ns

   

 Pars opercularis

0.008

ns

   

 Precentral

0.015

ns

   

 Paracentral

0.023

ns

   

 Caudal middle frontal

0.036

ns

   

 Superior frontal

0.036

ns

   

 Frontal pole

0.038

ns

   

 Fusiform

0.044

ns

   

 Postcentral

0.044

ns

   
  1. The p values of all nominally significant associations are presented. Applying a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5% by hemisphere to correct for multiple testing, HSV1+ patients had significantly smaller left caudal middle frontal, left precentral, left lingual, left middle temporal and left banks of superior temporal sulcus volumes compared with HSV1− patients. For the significant associations q values, effect sizes (partial eta2), p values from sex-, age-, scanner- and estimated intracranial volumes (ICV)- corrected ANCOVAs as well as p values from sex-, age- and scanner-adjusted multiple regressions of the HSV1 levels on regional volumes are presented.
  2. aSmaller regional volumes in HSV1+ patients compared with HSV1− patients.
  3. bSurvives FDR correction.
  4. cNon-significant.