Fig. 2: Enhanced GABAergic tone from the RMTg during conditioning to cocaine attenuates changes in ERK, PERK, and GluA1ps845 in the VTA. | Translational Psychiatry

Fig. 2: Enhanced GABAergic tone from the RMTg during conditioning to cocaine attenuates changes in ERK, PERK, and GluA1ps845 in the VTA.

From: Activation of RMTg projections to the VTA reverse cocaine-induced molecular adaptation in the reward system

Fig. 2

All rats were euthanized 45 min after the RePP test. Then, their VTA was taken out and homogenized. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and WB membranes were probed with the appropriate antibodies. A The bar histograms depict the level of ERK divided by Actin, rats treated with cocaine (15 mg/kg) displayed significantly lower values compared to all other groups (P < 0.001), as determined by a two-way ANOVA test [FOPTIC STIMULATION (1,29) = 9.199, P < 0.01, FGROUP(1,29) = 10.13, P < 0.01, FINTERACTION (1,29) = 9.441, P < 0.01, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test]. (n = 8, 7, 9, and 9 for saline -, saline +, cocaine-, and cocaine+ groups, respectively). B The bar histograms depict the level of pERK (Thr202/Tyr204) divided by ERK protein, rats treated with cocaine (15 mg/kg) displayed significantly higher values compared to all other groups (P < 0.001), as determined by a two-way ANOVA test [FOPTIC STIMULATION (1,16) = 5.075, P < 0.05, FGROUP(1,16) = 12.3, P < 0.01, FINTERACTION (1,16) = 22.18, P < 0.001, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test]. (n = 5 for all groups). C The bar histograms depict the level of GluA1 divided by Actin. No significant difference was found [FOPTIC STIMULATION (1,18) = 1.112, P > 0.05, FGROUP(1,18) = 3.486, P > 0.05, FINTERACTION (1,18) = 2.292, P > 0.05, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test]. (n = 5 for the saline groups, n = 6 for the cocaine groups). D The bar histograms depict the level of GluA1ps845 divided by GluA1 protein, rats treated with cocaine (15 mg/kg) displayed significantly higher values compared to saline-treated rats (P < 0.05), as determined by a two-way ANOVA test [FOPTIC STIMULATION (1,17) = 0.5023, P > 0.05, FGROUP(1,17) = 2.699, P > 0.05, FINTERACTION (1,17) = 7.414, P < 0.05, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test]. (n = 4, 5, 6, and 6 for saline–, saline +, cocaine-, and cocaine+ groups, respectively). E The bar histograms depict the level of GluA1ps831 divided by GluA1 protein, rats treated with cocaine (15 mg/kg) with optic stimulation displayed significantly lower values compared to the saline with optic stimulation and saline without optic stimulation groups (P < 0.05), as determined by a two-way ANOVA test. A nonsignificant reduction was found in the cocaine-treated group compared to the saline with optic stimulation and saline without optic stimulation groups [FOPTIC STIMULATION (1,14) = 0.3760, P > 0.05, FGROUP(1,14) = 14.33, P < 0.01, FINTERACTION (1,14) = 0.9373, P > 0.05, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test]. (n = 4 for the saline groups, n = 5 for the cocaine groups). (Off refers to - optic stimulation, whereas +On refers to +optic stimulation).

Back to article page