Table 1 The Pearson correlation between DMS power and model parameters in wild-type (WT) and Akt1+/− (HET) mice.
Reward learning rate | No Reward learning rate | Choice Consistency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT | Theta | Gamma | Theta | Gamma | Theta | Gamma |
Reward Condition | r = −0.3200 | r = −0.1918 | r = 0.2754 | r = 0.2303 | r = −0.1627 | r = −0.0998 |
p = 0.2006 | p = 0.3106 | p = 0.2366 | p = 0.2755 | p = 0.3379 | p = 0.3392 | |
No Reward Condition | r = 0.7883 | r = 0.8182 | r = −0.7087 | r = −0.7436 | r = −0.4049 | r = −0.4451 |
p = 0.0058* | p = 0.0035* | p = 0.0163* | p = 0.0108* | p = 0.1398 | p = 0.1149 | |
HET | ||||||
Reward Condition | r = −0.2609 | r = −0.2739 | r = 0.0417 | r = 0.051 | r = −0.3366 | r = −0.3567 |
p = 0.2489 | p = 0.2378 | p = 0.4576 | p = 0.4482 | p = 0.1879 | p = 0.173 | |
No Reward Condition | r = 0.5357 | r = 0.3510 | r = −0.767 | r = −0.8694 | r = −0.535 | r = −0.4869 |
p = 0.0686 | p = 0.1772 | p = 0.0079* | p = 0.0012* | p = 0.0689 | p = 0.0919 | |
