Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Translational Psychiatry
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. translational psychiatry
  3. articles
  4. article
R-loop landscapes in the developing human brain are linked to neural differentiation and cell type-specific transcription
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 April 2026

R-loop landscapes in the developing human brain are linked to neural differentiation and cell type-specific transcription

  • Elizabeth A. LaMarca1,2,3,4,5,
  • Atsushi Saito6,
  • Amara Plaza-Jennings1,2,5,
  • Sergio Espeso-Gil2,5,
  • Allyse Hellmich2,4,
  • Michael B. Fernando  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-80481,2,3,4,5,
  • Behnam Javidfar2,5,
  • Will Liao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-46947,
  • Molly Estill2,
  • Kayla Townsley1,2,3,4,5,
  • Anna Florio6,
  • James E. Ethridge2,5,
  • Catherine Do8,
  • Benjamin Tycko8,
  • Li Shen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-28512,
  • Atsushi Kamiya  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-55676,
  • Nadejda M. Tsankova2,9,
  • Kristen J. Brennand2,3,4,5,10 na1 &
  • …
  • Schahram Akbarian  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-08912,5 na1 

Translational Psychiatry , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Comparative genomics
  • Pathogenesis

Abstract

Here, we construct genome-scale maps of R-loops, three-stranded nucleic acid structures comprised of a DNA/RNA hybrid and a displaced single strand of DNA, in both proliferative and differentiated zones of the human prenatal brain. We show that R-loops are abundant in the progenitor-rich germinal matrix and preferentially form at gene promoters slated for upregulated expression at later stages of differentiation, including numerous neurodevelopmental risk genes. RNase H1-mediated contraction of the genomic R-loop space in neural progenitors shifted differentiation toward the neuronal lineage and was associated with transcriptomic alterations, along with defective functional and structural neuronal connectivity in vivo and in vitro. Therefore, we conclude that R-loops are important for fine-tuning differentiation-sensitive gene expression programs of neural progenitor cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

De novo genes with an lncRNA origin encode unique human brain developmental functionality

Article Open access 02 January 2023

Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells

Article Open access 04 August 2022

Analysis of R-loop forming regions identifies RNU2-2 and RNU5B-1 as neurodevelopmental disorder genes

Article Open access 29 May 2025

Data availability

Data are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (National Library of Medicine) under GEO accession numbers GSE327314 (single cell RNA-seq), GSE324347 (bulk RNA-seq in Supplemental Material) and GSE324290 (hiPSC-NPC-neuron DRIP-seq), GSE326631 (prenatal brain DRIP-seq).

Code availability

.n.a.

References

  1. Ypsilanti AR, Pattabiraman K, Catta-Preta R, Golonzhka O, Lindtner S, Tang K, et al. Transcriptional network orchestrating regional patterning of cortical progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2024795118.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trevino AE, Müller F, Andersen J, Sundaram L, Kathiria A, Shcherbina A, et al. Chromatin and gene-regulatory dynamics of the developing human cerebral cortex at single-cell resolution. Cell. 2021;184:5053–69.e23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amiri A, Coppola G, Scuderi S, Wu F, Roychowdhury T, Liu F, et al. Transcriptome and epigenome landscape of human cortical development modeled in organoids. Science. 2018;362:eaat6720.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ginno PA, Lott PL, Christensen HC, Korf I, Chédin F. R-loop formation is a distinctive characteristic of unmethylated human CpG island promoters. Mol Cell. 2012;45:814–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sanz LA, Hartono SR, Lim YW, Steyaert S, Rajpurkar A, Ginno PA, et al. Prevalent, dynamic, and conserved R-loop structures associate with specific epigenomic signatures in mammals. Mol Cell. 2016;63:167–78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sun Q, Csorba T, Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot NJ, Dean C. R-loop stabilization represses antisense transcription at the arabidopsis FLC locus. Science. 2013;340:619–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boque-Sastre R, Soler M, Oliveira-Mateos C, Portela A, Moutinho C, Sayols S, et al. Head-to-head antisense transcription and R-loop formation promotes transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:5785–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arab K, Karaulanov E, Musheev M, Trnka P, Schäfer A, Grummt I, et al. GADD45A binds R-loops and recruits TET1 to CpG island promoters. Nat Genet. 2019;51:217–23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Proudfoot NJ. Transcriptional termination in mammals: stopping the RNA polymerase II juggernaut. Science. 2016;352:aad9926.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huertas P, Aguilera A. Cotranscriptionally formed DNA:RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination. Mol Cell. 2003;12:711–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Manley JL. Inactivation of the SR protein splicing factor ASF/SF2 results in genomic instability. Cell. 2005;122:365–78.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera-Moyano E, Mergui X, García-Rubio ML, Barroso S, Aguilera A. The yeast and human FACT chromatin-reorganizing complexes solve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts. Genes Dev. 2014;28:735–48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yan P, Liu Z, Song M, Wu Z, Xu W, Li K, et al. Genome-wide R-loop Landscapes during cell differentiation and reprogramming. Cell Rep. 2020;32:107870.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pruss GJ, Manes SH, Drlica K. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants: increased supercoiling is corrected by mutations near gyrase genes. Cell. 1982;31:35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reyes A, Melchionda L, Nasca A, Carrara F, Lamantea E, Zanolini A, et al. RNASEH1 mutations impair mtDNA replication and cause adult-onset mitochondrial encephalomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:186–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bugiardini E, Poole OV, Manole A, Pittman AM, Horga A, Hargreaves I, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of RNASEH1-related mitochondrial disease. Neurol Genet. 2017;3:e149.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rusecka JM, Kierdaszuk B, Stępniak I, Rydzanicz M, Stawiński P, Gambin T, et al. Ataxia and oculomotor apraxia caused by a large-scale deletion in the senataxin gene. J Appl Genet. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-025-01001-2.

  18. Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot NJ, Gromak N. Human senataxin resolves RNA/DNA hybrids formed at transcriptional pause sites to promote Xrn2-dependent termination. Mol Cell. 2011;42:794–805.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grunseich C, Wang IX, Watts JA, Burdick JT, Guber RD, Zhu Z, et al. Senataxin mutation reveals how R-loops promote transcription by blocking DNA methylation at gene promoters. Mol Cell. 2018;69:426–37.e7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Groh M, Lufino MM, Wade-Martins R, Gromak N. R-loops associated with triplet repeat expansions promote gene silencing in friedreich ataxia and fragile X syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004318.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang K, Donnelly CJ, Haeusler AR, Grima JC, Machamer JB, Steinwald P, et al. The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature. 2015;525:56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Loomis EW, Sanz LA, Chédin F, Hagerman PJ. Transcription-associated R-loop formation across the human FMR1 CGG-repeat region. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004294.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chédin F, Hartono SR, Sanz LA, Vanoosthuyse V. Best practices for the visualization, mapping, and manipulation of R-loops. EMBO J. 2021;40:e106394.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dutrow N, Nix DA, Holt D, Milash B, Dalley B, Westbroek E, et al. Dynamic transcriptome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe shown by RNA-DNA hybrid mapping. Nat Genet. 2008;40:977–86.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Z, Zhang A, Storz G, Gottesman S, Leppla SH. An antibody-based microarray assay for small RNA detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Konig F, Schubert T, Langst G. The monoclonal S9.6 antibody exhibits highly variable binding affinities towards different R-loop sequences. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178875.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen X, Liu W, Wang Q, Wang X, Ren Y, Qu X, et al. Structural visualization of transcription initiation in action. Science. 2023;382:eadi5120.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frick DN, Richardson CC. DNA primases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:39–80.

    Google Scholar 

  29. García-Rubio ML, Pérez-Calero C, Barroso SI, Tumini E, Herrera-Moyano E, Rosado IV, et al. The fanconi anemia pathway protects genome integrity from R-loops. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005674.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kotsantis P, Silva LM, Irmscher S, Jones RM, Folkes L, Gromak N, et al. Increased global transcription activity as a mechanism of replication stress in cancer. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13087.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Graf M, Bonetti D, Lockhart A, Serhal K, Kellner V, Maicher A, et al. Telomere length determines TERRA and R-loop regulation through the cell cycle. Cell. 2017;170:72–85.e14.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Crossley MP, Bocek MJ, Hamperl S, Swigut T, Cimprich KA. qDRIP: a method to quantitatively assess RNA-DNA hybrid formation genome-wide. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:e84.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sanz LA, Castillo-Guzman D, Chedin F., Mapping R-loops and RNA:DNA hybrids with S9.6-based immunoprecipitation methods. J Vis Exp, 2021.

  34. Wulfridge P, Sarma K. Intertwining roles of R-loops and G-quadruplexes in DNA repair, transcription and genome organization. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26:1025–36.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wanrooij PH, Uhler JP, Shi Y, Westerlund F, Falkenberg M, Gustafsson CM. A hybrid G-quadruplex structure formed between RNA and DNA explains the extraordinary stability of the mitochondrial R-loop. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10334–44.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Miller JA, Ding SL, Sunkin SM, Smith KA, Ng L, Szafer A, et al. Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain. Nature. 2014;508:199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu J, Wu X, Zhang H, Pfeifer GP, Lu Q. Dynamics of RNA polymerase II pausing and bivalent histone H3 methylation during neuronal differentiation in brain development. Cell Rep. 2017;20:1307–18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cascante A, Klum S, Biswas M, Antolin-Fontes B, Barnabé-Heider F, Hermanson O. Gene-specific methylation control of H3K9 and H3K36 on neurotrophic BDNF versus astroglial GFAP genes by KDM4A/C regulates neural stem cell differentiation. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:3467–77.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zu X, Yu L, Sun Y, Tian J, Liu F, Sun Q, et al. Global mapping of ZBTB7A transcription factor binding sites in HepG2 cells. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2010;15:260–71.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pereira JD, Sansom SN, Smith J, Dobenecker MW, Tarakhovsky A, Livesey FJ. Ezh2, the histone methyltransferase of PRC2, regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:15957–62.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huang Y, Myers SJ, Dingledine R. Transcriptional repression by REST: recruitment of Sin3A and histone deacetylase to neuronal genes. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:867–72.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Baldelli P, Meldolesi J., The transcription repressor REST in adult neurons: physiology, pathology, and diseases. eNeuro, 2015;2.

  43. Koopmans F, van Nierop P, Andres-Alonso M, Byrnes A, Cijsouw T, Coba MP, et al. SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. Neuron. 2019;103:217–34.e4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang G, Chen S, Chen X, Zheng J, Xu Z, Doostparast Torshizi A, et al. Uncovering the functional link between SHANK3 deletions and deficiency in neurodevelopment using iPSC-derived human neurons. Front Neuroanat. 2019;13:23.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li Y, Jia X, Wu H, Xun G, Ou J, Zhang Q, et al. Genotype and phenotype correlations for SHANK3 de novo mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:2668–76.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang G, Li S, Yang L, Wang M, Chen G, Zhu D. [Analysis of NOVA2 gene variant in a child with neurodevelopmental disorder with or without autistic features and/or structural brain abnormalities]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2023;40:213–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mattioli F, Hayot G, Drouot N, Isidor B, Courraud J, Hinckelmann MV, et al. De novo frameshift variants in the neuronal splicing factor NOVA2 result in a common C-terminal extension and cause a severe form of neurodevelopmental disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106:438–52.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brennand K, Savas JN, Kim Y, Tran N, Simone A, Hashimoto-Torii K, et al. Phenotypic differences in hiPSC NPCs derived from patients with schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:361–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hoffman GE, Hartley BJ, Flaherty E, Ladran I, Gochman P, Ruderfer DM, et al. Transcriptional signatures of schizophrenia in hiPSC-derived NPCs and neurons are concordant with post-mortem adult brains. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2225.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hausen P, Stein H. Ribonuclease H. An enzyme degrading the RNA moiety of DNA-RNA hybrids. Eur J Biochem. 1970;14:278–83.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cerritelli SM, Frolova EG, Feng C, Grinberg A, Love PE, Crouch RJ. Failure to produce mitochondrial DNA results in embryonic lethality in rnaseh1 null mice. Molecular Cell. 2003;11:807–15.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wahba L, Amon JD, Koshland D, Vuica-Ross M. RNase H and multiple RNA biogenesis factors cooperate to prevent RNA:DNA hybrids from generating genome instability. Mol Cell. 2011;44:978–88.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ohle C, Tesorero R, Schermann G, Dobrev N, Sinning I, Fischer T. Transient RNA-DNA hybrids are required for efficient double-strand break repair. Cell. 2016;167:1001–13.e7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lockhart A, Pires VB, Bento F, Kellner V, Luke-Glaser S, Yakoub G, et al. RNase H1 and H2 are differentially regulated to process RNA-DNA hybrids. Cell Rep. 2019;29:2890–900.e5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Skourti-Stathaki K, Torlai Triglia E, Warburton M, Voigt P, Bird A, Pombo A. R-loops enhance polycomb repression at a subset of developmental regulator genes. Mol Cell. 2019;73:930–45.e4.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wu H, Lima WF, Crooke ST. Investigating the structure of human RNase H1 by site-directed mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23547–53.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brown TA, Tkachuk AN, Clayton DA. Native R-loops persist throughout the mouse mitochondrial DNA genome. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:36743–51.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chen PB, Chen HV, Acharya D, Rando OJ, Fazzio TG. R loops regulate promoter-proximal chromatin architecture and cellular differentiation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:999–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kabeche L, Nguyen HD, Buisson R, Zou L. A mitosis-specific and R loop-driven ATR pathway promotes faithful chromosome segregation. Science. 2018;359:108–14.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vanoosthuyse V. Strengths and weaknesses of the current strategies to map and characterize R-loops. Noncoding RNA. 2018;4:9.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Xu X, Wells AB, O’Brien DR, Nehorai A, Dougherty JD. Cell type-specific expression analysis to identify putative cellular mechanisms for neurogenetic disorders. J Neurosci. 2014;34:1420–31.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Flaherty E, Zhu S, Barretto N, Cheng E, Deans PJM, Fernando MB, et al. Neuronal impact of patient-specific aberrant NRXN1alpha splicing. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1679–90.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Basu SN, Kollu R, Banerjee-Basu S. AutDB: a gene reference resource for autism research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D832–6.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhou X, Feliciano P, Shu C, Wang T, Astrovskaya I, Hall JB, et al. Integrating de novo and inherited variants in 42,607 autism cases identifies mutations in new moderate-risk genes. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1305–19.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Helsmoortel C, Vulto-van Silfhout AT, Coe BP, Vandeweyer G, Rooms L, van den Ende J, et al. A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP. Nat Genet. 2014;46:380–4.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Arnett AB, Rhoads CL, Hoekzema K, Turner TN, Gerdts J, Wallace AS, et al. The autism spectrum phenotype in ADNP syndrome. Autism Res. 2018;11:1300–10.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ka M, Kim WY. ANKRD11 associated with intellectual disability and autism regulates dendrite differentiation via the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;111:138–52.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Gallagher D, Voronova A, Zander MA, Cancino GI, Bramall A, Krause MP, et al. Ankrd11 is a chromatin regulator involved in autism that is essential for neural development. Dev Cell. 2015;32:31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tian C, Paskus JD, Fingleton E, Roche KW, Herring BE. Autism spectrum disorder/intellectual disability-associated mutations in trio disrupt neuroligin 1-mediated synaptogenesis. J Neurosci. 2021;41:7768–78.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Parenti I, Leitão E, Kuechler A, Villard L, Goizet C, Courdier C, et al. The different clinical facets of SYN1-related neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1019715.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fassio A, Patry L, Congia S, Onofri F, Piton A, Gauthier J, et al. SYN1 loss-of-function mutations in autism and partial epilepsy cause impaired synaptic function. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:2297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wang Z, Li J, Zhang T, Lu T, Wang H, Jia M, et al. Family-based association study identifies SNAP25 as a susceptibility gene for autism in the Han Chinese population. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;105:109985.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014;511:421–7.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pardiñas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, Escott-Price V, Ripke S, Carrera N, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat Genet. 2018;50:381–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wu Y, Li X, Liu J, Luo XJ, Yao YG. SZDB2.0: an updated comprehensive resource for schizophrenia research. Hum Genet. 2020;139:1285–97.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mullins N, Forstner AJ, O’Connell KS, Coombes B, Coleman JRI, Qiao Z, et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat Genet. 2021;53:817–29.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Epi25 Collaborative. Ultra-rare genetic variation in the epilepsies: a whole-exome sequencing study of 17,606 individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:267–82.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Stahl EA, Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, Xie G, Eyre S, Thomson BP, et al. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies seven new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42:508–14.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Luhmann HJ, Sinning A, Yang JW, Reyes-Puerta V, Stüttgen MC, Kirischuk S, et al. Spontaneous neuronal activity in developing neocortical networks: from single cells to large-scale interactions. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;10:40.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Durbec P, Franceschini I, Lazarini F, Dubois-Dalcq M. In vitro migration assays of neural stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;438:213–25.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Taniguchi Y, Young-Pearse T, Sawa A, Kamiya A. In utero electroporation as a tool for genetic manipulation in vivo to study psychiatric disorders: from genes to circuits and behaviors. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:169–79.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Saito A, Taniguchi Y, Rannals MD, Merfeld EB, Ballinger MD, Koga M, et al. Early postnatal GABAA receptor modulation reverses deficits in neuronal maturation in a conditional neurodevelopmental mouse model of DISC1. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1449–59.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Zhu X, Nedelcovych MT, Thomas AG, Hasegawa Y, Moreno-Megui A, Coomer W, et al. JHU-083 selectively blocks glutaminase activity in brain CD11b(+) cells and prevents depression-associated behaviors induced by chronic social defeat stress. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:683–94.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Gourley SL, Olevska A, Warren MS, Taylor JR, Koleske AJ. Arg kinase regulates prefrontal dendritic spine refinement and cocaine-induced plasticity. J Neurosci. 2012;32:2314–23.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Skalska L, Beltran-Nebot M, Ule J, Jenner RG. Regulatory feedback from nascent RNA to chromatin and transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:331–7.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Santos-Pereira JM, Aguilera A. R loops: new modulators of genome dynamics and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:583–97.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Aguilera A, Garcia-Muse T. R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. Mol Cell. 2012;46:115–24.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Rios M, Lambe EK, Liu R, Teillon S, Liu J, Akbarian S, et al. Severe deficits in 5-HT2A -mediated neurotransmission in BDNF conditional mutant mice. J Neurobiol. 2006;66:408–20.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Belotserkovskii BP, Hanawalt PC. Topology and kinetics of R-loop formation. Biophys J. 2022;121:3345–57.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Pan X, Huang LF. Multi-omics to characterize the functional relationships of R-loops with epigenetic modifications, RNAPII transcription and gene expression. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23:bbac238.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Pezone A, Zuchegna C, Tramontano A, Romano A, Russo G, de Rosa M, et al. RNA stabilizes transcription-dependent chromatin loops induced by nuclear hormones. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3925.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Salas-Armenteros I, Pérez-Calero C, Bayona-Feliu A, Tumini E, Luna R, Aguilera A. Human THO-Sin3A interaction reveals new mechanisms to prevent R-loops that cause genome instability. EMBO J. 2017;36:3532–47.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Marchetto MC, Belinson H, Tian Y, Freitas BC, Fu C, Vadodaria K, et al. Altered proliferation and networks in neural cells derived from idiopathic autistic individuals. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:820–35.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kim EC, Patel J, Zhang J, Soh H, Rhodes JS, Tzingounis AV, et al. Heterozygous loss of epilepsy gene KCNQ2 alters social, repetitive and exploratory behaviors. Genes Brain Behav. 2020;19:e12599.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Brennand KJ, Simone A, Jou J, Gelboin-Burkhart C, Tran N, Sangar S, et al. Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;473:221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Tran NN, Ladran IG, Brennand KJ. Modeling schizophrenia using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived and fibroblast-induced neurons. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Roussos P, Mitchell AC, Voloudakis G, Fullard JF, Pothula VM, Tsang J, et al. A role for noncoding variation in schizophrenia. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1417–29.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Topol A, Tran NN, Brennand KJ. A guide to generating and using hiPSC derived NPCs for the study of neurological diseases. J Vis Exp, 2015: e52495.

  100. Roberts RW, Crothers DM. Stability and properties of double and triple helices: dramatic effects of RNA or DNA backbone composition. Science. 1992;258:1463–6.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Peter CJ, Saito A, Hasegawa Y, Tanaka Y, Nagpal M, Perez G, et al. In vivo epigenetic editing of Sema6a promoter reverses transcallosal dysconnectivity caused by C11orf46/Arl14ep risk gene. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4112.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Saxena A, Wagatsuma A, Noro Y, Kuji T, Asaka-Oba A, Watahiki A, et al. Trehalose-enhanced isolation of neuronal sub-types from adult mouse brain. Biotechniques. 2012;52:381–5.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Amemiya HM, Kundaje A, Boyle AP. The ENCODE blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9354.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–89.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Yu G, Wang LG, He QY. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2382–3.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Carroll TS, Liang Z, Salama R, Stark R, de Santiago I. Impact of artifact removal on ChIP quality metrics in ChIP-seq and ChIP-exo data. Front Genet. 2014;5:75.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Ramírez F, Dündar F, Diehl S, Grüning BA, Manke T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W187–91.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ross-Innes CS, Stark R, Teschendorff AE, Holmes KA, Ali HR, Dunning MJ, et al. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature. 2012;481:389–93.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ge SX, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2628–9.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Gel B, Díez-Villanueva A, Serra E, Buschbeck M, Peinado MA, Malinverni R. regioneR: an R/Bioconductor package for the association analysis of genomic regions based on permutation tests. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:289–91.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–30.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM 3rd, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–902.e21.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–7.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Zhao ZH, Zheng G, Wang T, Du KJ, Han X, Luo WJ, et al. Low-level gestational lead exposure alters dendritic spine plasticity in the hippocampus and reduces learning and memory in rats. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3533.

    Google Scholar 

  121. de la Torre-Ubieta L, Stein JL, Won H, Opland CK, Liang D, Lu D, et al. The dynamic landscape of open chromatin during human cortical neurogenesis. Cell. 2018;172:289–304.e18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Akbarian and Brennand laboratories for constructive comments and discussions. Bibi Kassim, Natalie Barretto, Samuel Powell, Esther Cheng, Yuto Hasegawa, and Sasha Layne for laboratory assistance. The New York Genome Center, Kristin Beaumont and the Mount Sinai Genomics Core Facility, and Prashant Singh at the Roswell Park Genomics Shared Resource for sequencing support. John Greally, Julie Nadel, Achla Gupta, and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Proteomics Core for assistance with S9.6 antibody generation and purification. Zhiping Weng, Kaili Fan, Kiran Girdhar, and Gabriel Hoffman for productive discussions. We also thank Frédéric Chédin and Lionel Sanz for generously sharing reagents and the DRIP-seq protocol.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health PsychENCODE grants 1U01DA048279 and R01MH106056 (SA and KJB), R01DA054526 (SA), R56MH101454 (KJB), RF1DA048810 (NMT), R01DA060630 (AK), R01AG065168 (AK), P50MH136297 (AK), and a predoctoral Ruth L. Kirschstein fellowship F31MH121062 (EAL).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Kristen J. Brennand, Schahram Akbarian.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Elizabeth A. LaMarca, Amara Plaza-Jennings, Michael B. Fernando & Kayla Townsley

  2. Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Elizabeth A. LaMarca, Amara Plaza-Jennings, Sergio Espeso-Gil, Allyse Hellmich, Michael B. Fernando, Behnam Javidfar, Molly Estill, Kayla Townsley, James E. Ethridge, Li Shen, Nadejda M. Tsankova, Kristen J. Brennand & Schahram Akbarian

  3. Pamela Sklar Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Elizabeth A. LaMarca, Michael B. Fernando, Kayla Townsley & Kristen J. Brennand

  4. Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Elizabeth A. LaMarca, Allyse Hellmich, Michael B. Fernando, Kayla Townsley & Kristen J. Brennand

  5. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Elizabeth A. LaMarca, Amara Plaza-Jennings, Sergio Espeso-Gil, Michael B. Fernando, Behnam Javidfar, Kayla Townsley, James E. Ethridge, Kristen J. Brennand & Schahram Akbarian

  6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA

    Atsushi Saito, Anna Florio & Atsushi Kamiya

  7. New York Genome Center, New York, NY, 10013, USA

    Will Liao

  8. Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, 111 Ideation Way, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA

    Catherine Do & Benjamin Tycko

  9. Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Nadejda M. Tsankova

  10. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    Kristen J. Brennand

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. LaMarca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Atsushi Saito
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amara Plaza-Jennings
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Espeso-Gil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Allyse Hellmich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael B. Fernando
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Behnam Javidfar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Will Liao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Molly Estill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kayla Townsley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Anna Florio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. James E. Ethridge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Catherine Do
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Benjamin Tycko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Li Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Atsushi Kamiya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Nadejda M. Tsankova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Kristen J. Brennand
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Schahram Akbarian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Experiments conducted by EAL (hiPSC differentiations, RNASEH1 cloning and lentiviral construction/transduction, DRIP-seq, RNA-seq, MEA, ICC, qPCR, Migration assay, WB, dot blot), AS and AF (IUE, spine density and Sholl analyses, in vivo IHC/qPCR), BJ (FISH), AH (qPCR, optical intensity and image analyses), MBF (hiPSC-neuron differentiation and ICC), KJB (hiPSC/NPC generation), and NMT (prenatal brain dissection). Bioinformatic analysis conducted by EAL (DRIP-seq, RNA-seq, scRNA-seq), APJ (scRNA-seq), CD, SEG, JEE, ME, and WL Research supervised by SA, KJB, NMT, AK, BT, and LS Study and experiments conceived by EAL, SA, and KJB Figures designed by EAL and SA Paper written by EAL, SA, and KJB, with contributions from all co-authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kristen J. Brennand or Schahram Akbarian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All human induced pluripotent stem cell work was conducted under the oversight of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (HS13-­00500) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, with informed consent from all participants. Brain tissue after death was collected at the Mount Sinai Pathology Department in accordance with the institutional policies and regulations, along with next-of-kin consent for the de-identified tissue to be used for research purposes and approved under IRB STUDY-18-00983. All animal experiments were performed in the Johns Hopkins University Brain Science Institute’s Behavioral Core according to the University’s Animal Care and Use Committee’s guidelines and approved under Protocol Number MO23M218.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures S1-S4 (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables S1-S21 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LaMarca, E.A., Saito, A., Plaza-Jennings, A. et al. R-loop landscapes in the developing human brain are linked to neural differentiation and cell type-specific transcription. Transl Psychiatry (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04009-2

Download citation

  • Received: 26 January 2025

  • Revised: 03 March 2026

  • Accepted: 24 March 2026

  • Published: 13 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04009-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Calls for Papers
  • Press Releases

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Translational Psychiatry (Transl Psychiatry)

ISSN 2158-3188 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited