Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Translational Psychiatry
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. translational psychiatry
  3. articles
  4. article
The social dimension of apathy: evidence for a distinct domain from 11,243 individuals across health and neurocognitive disorders
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 April 2026

The social dimension of apathy: evidence for a distinct domain from 11,243 individuals across health and neurocognitive disorders

  • Sijia Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-07021,
  • Rong Ye  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2529-77552,3,4,5,
  • Qian-Yuan Tang6,
  • Bahaaeddin Attaallah7,8,
  • Sofia Toniolo8,9,
  • Youssuf Saleh8,9,
  • Matthew A. Rouse10,
  • Peter Garrard11,
  • M. John Broulidakis1,9,
  • Sian Thompson9,
  • Sanjay G. Manohar1,8,9,
  • Sarosh R. Irani  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-97488,12,13,
  • Yuen-Siang Ang14,
  • Patricia Lockwood  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-955915,16,17,
  • Matthew A. J. Apps15,16,
  • Panpan Hu2,4,5,
  • Kai Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-914X2,3,4,5,18,19,
  • James B. Rowe10,20,21,
  • Campbell Le Heron22,23,24 &
  • …
  • Masud Husain1,8,9 

Translational Psychiatry , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Depression
  • Diagnostic markers
  • Human behaviour

Abstract

Apathy is a highly prevalent and disabling neuropsychiatric syndrome, but its multi-dimensional structure is a challenge for progress towards better identification and treatment. A crucial unresolved question is whether social disengagement reflects a distinct deficit in social motivation or a by-product of diminished initiative or emotional blunting. Previous studies have been constrained by modest sample sizes and limited use of apathy-specific instruments or phenotypically narrow cohorts. Here, we analysed item-level data from 11,243 individuals recruited across multiple centres, including 1154 neurological patients with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, autoimmune encephalitis and small vessel disease, alongside people with depression and healthy adults. Across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, symptom-level network modelling, and lifespan analyses, social apathy consistently emerged as a coherent and separable dimension. This pattern was preserved across health, psychiatric, and neurocognitive cohorts, from adolescence through late life. Recognising social apathy as an independent domain reframes a central aspect of mental health—the motivation to connect, care, and act for others—and provides a foundation for more precise assessment and for interventions targeting both social and neurobiological mechanisms.

References

  1. Miller DS, Robert P, Ereshefsky L, Adler L, Bateman D, Cummings J, et al. Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:1892–904.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert P, Onyike CU, Leentjens AFG, Dujardin K, Aalten P, Starkstein S, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer’s disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malpetti M, Jones PS, Tsvetanov KA, Rittman T, van Swieten JC, Borroni B, et al. Apathy in presymptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia predicts cognitive decline and is driven by structural brain changes. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:969–83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Dalen JW, Van Wanrooij LL, Moll van Charante EP, Richard E, van Gool WA. Apathy is associated with incident dementia in community-dwelling older people. Neurology. 2018;90:e82–e89.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Dalen JW, van Wanrooij LL, Moll van Charante EP, Brayne C, van Gool WA, Richard E. Association of apathy with risk of incident dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:1012–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison F, Mortby ME, Mather KA, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H. Apathy as a determinant of health behaviors in older adults: Implications for dementia risk reduction. Alzheimers Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit. 2023;15:e12505.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dolphin H, Dyer AH, McHale C, O’Dowd S, Kennelly SP. An update on apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatrics. 2023;8:75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Connors MH, Teixeira-Pinto A, Ames D, Woodward M, Brodaty H. Apathy and depression in mild cognitive impairment: distinct longitudinal trajectories and clinical outcomes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2023;35:633–42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murley AG, Rouse MA, Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, Jones PS, Li W, Wiggins J, et al. Predicting loss of independence and mortality in frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:737–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao S, Ye R, Sen A, Li M, Karataş KF, Lockwood P, et al. On the relationships between apathy, depression and anhedonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2026 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337245.

  11. Hewitt SRC, Norbury A, Huys QJM, Hauser TU. Day-to-day fluctuations in motivation drive effort-based decision-making. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2025;122:e2417964122.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Husain M, Roiser JP. Neuroscience of apathy and anhedonia: a transdiagnostic approach. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:470–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rizvi SJ, Pizzagalli DA, Sproule BA, Kennedy SH. Assessing anhedonia in depression: Potentials and pitfalls. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;65:21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starkstein SE, Ingram L, Garau ML, Mizrahi R. On the overlap between apathy and depression in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1070–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mortby ME, Maercker A, Forstmeier S. Apathy: a separate syndrome from depression in dementia? A critical review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24:305–16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lanctôt KL, Ismail Z, Bawa KK, Cummings JL, Husain M, Mortby ME, et al. Distinguishing apathy from depression: A review differentiating the behavioral, neuroanatomic, and treatment-related aspects of apathy from depression in neurocognitive disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;38:e5882.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levy ML, Cummings JL, Fairbanks LA, Masterman D, Miller BL, Craig AH, et al. Apathy is not depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;10:314–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Masdrakis VG, Markianos M, Baldwin DS. Apathy associated with antidepressant drugs: a systematic review. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2023;35:189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson SS, Husain M. Are there distinct dimensions of apathy? The argument for reappraisal. Cortex. 2022;149:246–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marin RS. Differential diagnosis and classification of apathy. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levy R, Dubois B. Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex–basal ganglia circuits. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:916–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert P, Lanctôt KL, Agüera-Ortiz L, Aalten P, Bremond F, Defrancesco M, et al. Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group. Eur Psychiatry J Assoc Eur Psychiatr. 2018;54:1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ang Y-S, Lockwood P, Apps MAJ, Muhammed K, Husain M. Distinct subtypes of apathy revealed by the apathy motivation index. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169938.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991;38:143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Radakovic R, Abrahams S. Multidimensional apathy: evidence from neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018;22:42–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao S, Scholcz A, Rouse MA, Klar VS, Ganse-Dumrath A, Toniolo S, et al. Self- versus caregiver-reported apathy across neurological disorders. Brain Commun. 2025;7:fcaf235.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steffens DC, Fahed M, Manning KJ, Wang L. The neurobiology of apathy in depression and neurocognitive impairment in older adults: a review of epidemiological, clinical, neuropsychological and biological research. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao Q-F, Tan L, Wang H-F, Jiang T, Tan M-S, Tan L, et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:264–71.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson J, Bi M, Murchison AG, Makuch M, Bien CG, Chu K, et al. The importance of early immunotherapy in patients with faciobrachial dystonic seizures. Brain. 2018;141:348–56.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ceronie B, Strippel C, Uy C, Paneva S, Makuch M, Soleimani B, et al. Immunotherapy-resistant neuropathic pain and fatigue predict quality-of-life in contactin-associated protein-like 2 antibody disease. Ann Neurol. 2025;97:521–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MacAskill MR, Pitcher TL, Melzer TR, Myall DJ, Horne K-L, Shoorangiz R, et al. The New Zealand Parkinson’s progression programme. J R Soc N Z. 2023;53:466–88.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown G Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00742-000.

  34. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Radakovic R, Starr JM, Abrahams S. A novel assessment and profiling of multidimensional apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;60:57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36:242–50.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn Routledge: New York, 1988 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587.

  38. Klar VS, Ang Y-S, Lockwood P, Attaallah B, Dickson S, Drew D, et al. Assessment of apathy in neurological patients using the apathy motivation index caregiver version. J Neuropsychol. 2022;16:236–58.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fried EI, van Borkulo CD, Cramer AOJ, Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, Borsboom D. Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Briganti G, Scutari M, Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Hoekstra RHA, Golino HF, et al. Network analysis: An overview for mental health research. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024;33:e2034.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2008;2008:P10008.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Traag V, Waltman L, Eck NJ, van. From louvain to leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5233.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Le Heron C, Holroyd CB, Salamone J, Husain M. Brain mechanisms underlying apathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:302–12.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tay J, Tuladhar AM, Hollocks MJ, Brookes RL, Tozer DJ, Barrick TR, et al. Apathy is associated with large-scale white matter network disruption in small vessel disease. Neurology. 2019;92:e1157–e1167.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Apps MAJ, Rushworth MFS, Chang SWC. The anterior cingulate gyrus and social cognition: tracking the motivation of others. Neuron. 2016;90:692–707.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lockwood PL, Wittmann MK, Nili H, Matsumoto-Ryan M, Abdurahman A, Cutler J, et al. Distinct neural representations for prosocial and self-benefiting effort. Curr Biol. 2022;32:4172.e7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lockwood PL, Hamonet M, Zhang SH, Ratnavel A, Salmony FU, Husain M, et al. Prosocial apathy for helping others when effort is required. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lockwood PL, Cutler J, Drew D, Abdurahman A, Jeyaretna DS, Apps MAJ, et al. Human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for prosocial motivation. Nat Hum Behav. 2024;8:1403–16.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Van Overwalle F. Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:829–58.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Adolphs R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693–716.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Amodio DM, Frith CD. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:268–77.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kalenscher T, Lüpken LM, Stoop R, Terburg D, van Honk J. Steeper social discounting after human basolateral amygdala damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2025;122:e2500692122.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Grabenhorst F, Báez-Mendoza R, Genest W, Deco G, Schultz W. Primate amygdala neurons simulate decision processes of social partners. Cell. 2019;177:986.e15.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Williams RS, Adams NE, Hughes LE, Rouse MA, Murley AG, Naessens M, et al. Syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration change response patterns on visual analogue scales. Sci Rep. 2023;13:8939.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre. S.Z., S.T., M.J.B., and M.H. are funded by the Wellcome Trust [226645/Z/22/Z]. S.T., S.G.M. and M.H. are funded by and the NIHR Oxford Health BRC. S.G.M. is also supported by the NIHR Oxford BRC. J.B.R. is supported by the Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00030/14; SUAG/092 G116768], the Wellcome Trust [220258], the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [NIHR203312], and the Holt Fellowship. S.R.I. is supported by a Senior Clinical Fellowship from the Medical Research Council [MR/V007173/1], a Wellcome Trust Fellowship [104079/Z/14/Z], the Kogod Centre on Aging (Mayo Clinic), and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. R.Y. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [82171917, 82471271, U23A20424], the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2408085Y047], and the Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee [2023AH050592]. Q.Y.T. was funded by Guangdong and Hong Kong Universities “1 + 1 + 1” Joint Research Collaboration Scheme (2025A0505000011). C.L.H. is supported by a grant from the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation [02/2019]. B.A. is supported by an NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship. We gratefully acknowledge all the participants, their families, and the staff at the Cognitive Disorders Clinic and the Autoimmune Neurology Clinic at John Radcliffe Hospital, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, St George’s Hospital, the New Zealand Brain Research Institute and the China Parkinson’s Disease Advanced Center for their dedication to this programme. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK

    Sijia Zhao, M. John Broulidakis, Sanjay G. Manohar & Masud Husain

  2. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China

    Rong Ye, Panpan Hu & Kai Wang

  3. School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China

    Rong Ye & Kai Wang

  4. Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, 230022, China

    Rong Ye, Panpan Hu & Kai Wang

  5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, 230032, China

    Rong Ye, Panpan Hu & Kai Wang

  6. Department of Physics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China

    Qian-Yuan Tang

  7. Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, W12 0BZ, UK

    Bahaaeddin Attaallah

  8. Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK

    Bahaaeddin Attaallah, Sofia Toniolo, Youssuf Saleh, Sanjay G. Manohar, Sarosh R. Irani & Masud Husain

  9. Cognitive Disorders Clinic, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK

    Sofia Toniolo, Youssuf Saleh, M. John Broulidakis, Sian Thompson, Sanjay G. Manohar & Masud Husain

  10. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK

    Matthew A. Rouse & James B. Rowe

  11. School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George’s, University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK

    Peter Garrard

  12. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Sarosh R. Irani

  13. Department of Neurosciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Sarosh R. Irani

  14. Social and Cognitive Computing Department, Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore

    Yuen-Siang Ang

  15. Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Patricia Lockwood & Matthew A. J. Apps

  16. Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Patricia Lockwood & Matthew A. J. Apps

  17. Centre for Developmental Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Patricia Lockwood

  18. Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, 230088, China

    Kai Wang

  19. Anhui Institute of Translational Medicine, Hefei, 230000, China

    Kai Wang

  20. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    James B. Rowe

  21. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    James B. Rowe

  22. Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Campbell Le Heron

  23. New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Campbell Le Heron

  24. Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Campbell Le Heron

Authors
  1. Sijia Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rong Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qian-Yuan Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bahaaeddin Attaallah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sofia Toniolo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Youssuf Saleh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthew A. Rouse
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Peter Garrard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M. John Broulidakis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sian Thompson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sanjay G. Manohar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sarosh R. Irani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yuen-Siang Ang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Patricia Lockwood
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Matthew A. J. Apps
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Panpan Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Kai Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. James B. Rowe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Campbell Le Heron
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Masud Husain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SZ conceptualised and designed the study. MH supervised the project and acquired the funding. Patient recruitment and clinical data collection were carried out by SZ, RY, BA, STo, YS, MAR, PG, MJB, STh, SGM, SRI, YSA, PL, MAJA, PH, KW, JBR, CLH, and MH. SZ performed the formal data analysis and visualisation. QYT contributed proprietary software and analytical tools, and reviewed the analysis scripts. SZ and MH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sijia Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.R.I. has received honoraria and/or research support from Amgen, Argenx, UCB, Roche, Janssen, IQVIA, Clarivate, Slingshot Insights, Cerebral Therapeutics, BioHaven Therapeutics, CSL Behring, and ONO Pharma. S.R.I. also receives licensed royalties on patent application WO/2010/046716 entitled Neurological Autoimmune Disorders, and has filed two other patents entitled Diagnostic Method and Therapy (WO2019211633; US App 17/051,930; PCT application WO202189788A1) and Biomarkers (WO202189788A1; US App 18/279,624; PCT/GB2022/050614). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Data sharing

Data from both healthy participants and patient cohorts were collected across multiple centres under separate local ethical approvals. Due to these ethical restrictions, not all data can be shared publicly. Patient data are available upon reasonable request, subject to approval from the original data providers (i.e. the researchers responsible for data collection) and compliance with relevant ethical, legal, and confidentiality requirements.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Ye, R., Tang, QY. et al. The social dimension of apathy: evidence for a distinct domain from 11,243 individuals across health and neurocognitive disorders. Transl Psychiatry (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04023-4

Download citation

  • Received: 26 November 2025

  • Revised: 11 March 2026

  • Accepted: 24 March 2026

  • Published: 08 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04023-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Calls for Papers
  • Press Releases

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Translational Psychiatry (Transl Psychiatry)

ISSN 2158-3188 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited