Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Advice
  • Published:

Personalised care planning – do I really have to give all the options?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

References

  1. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1WLR 582.

  2. Boltho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] UKHL 46.

  3. McCullogh v Forth Valley Hetah Board [2023] UKSC 26.

  4. Montgomery Lanarkshire Hetah Board [2015] AC1430.

  5. Winterbotham v Sharak [2024] EWHC 2633 9KB.

  6. CambridgeshireLive. News release: Woman ‘in constant pain' wins £250k after suing Cambridge dentist over wisdom tooth removal October 2024. Available at https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/woman-in-constant-pain-wins-30203290 (accessed December 2025).

  7. Chester v Afshar [2005] 1AC 134.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Len D´Cruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D´Cruz, L. Personalised care planning – do I really have to give all the options?. BDJ In Pract 39, 24–25 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-025-3404-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-025-3404-z

Search

Quick links