Table 3 Comparison of MNE and FR according to the experimental results for each model.
Index | Network model | WFLW | 300 W | Customize | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common | Challenging | Full | ||||
MNE(%) | Resnet50 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 15.4 | 10.7 | – |
Mobile-net | 6.9 | 8.2 | 17.5 | 11.4 | – | |
DeCaFa [45] | 6.6 | – | – | – | – | |
PIP-Net [18] | 6.5 | – | – | – | – | |
EfficientNet-B3 [46] | 7.8 | – | – | – | – | |
ATPN [47] | 6.1 | – | – | – | – | |
3FabRec [48] | 6.2 | 7.3 | 9.7 | 8.3 | – | |
HR-net | 5.9 | 7.3 | 9.4 | 8.1 | 7.5 | |
BHR-net | 5.2 | 6.9 | 9.4 | 7.8 | 2.5 | |
FR > 10% (%) | Resnet50 | 11.9 | 10.9 | 20.6 | 11.6 | – |
Mobile-net | 14.35 | 10.2 | 29.4 | 17.3 | – | |
DeCaFa [45] | 8.9 | – | – | – | – | |
PIP-Net [18] | 8.2 | – | – | – | – | |
EfficientNet–B3 [46] | 19.7 | – | – | – | – | |
ATPN [47] | 7.4 | – | – | – | – | |
3FabRec [48] | 8.2 | – | – | – | – | |
HR-net | 7.1 | 8.6 | 16.3 | 12.1 | 7.2 | |
BHR-net | 6.9 | 7.8 | 13.7 | 10.6 | 1.4 | |
