Table 3 Mean values and their standard deviations (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-values regarding the site of the implant.

From: Influence of two different printing methods on the accuracy of full-guided implant insertion – a laboratory study in undergraduate dental students

Parameter

Implant site

Mean value

±SD

Mean difference

Lower limit 95% CI

Upper limit 95% CI

p-value

Three-dimensional angulation in degrees

Right

3.00

1.88

0.71

2.99

3.01

0.001

Left

2.29

1.55

 

2.28

2.30

 

Three-dimensional mismatch at implant base in mm

Right

0.91

0.46

0.13

0.90

0.91

0.010

Left

0.77

0.40

 

0.77

0.78

 

Mesio-distal mismatch at implant base in mm

Right

−0.28

0.37

−0.13

−0.28

−0.28

0.001

Left

−0.15

0.30

 

−0.15

−0.15

 

Bucco-lingual mismatch at implant base in mm

Right

0.25

0.46

0.36

0.25

0.25

<0.001

Left

−0.11

0.39

 

−0.11

−0.11

 

Vertical mismatch at implant base in mm

Right

−0.47

0.56

−0.08

−0.47

−0.46

0.212

Left

−0.38

0.58

 

−0.39

−0.38

 

Three-dimensional mismatch at implant tip in mm

Right

1.30

0.67

0.23

1.29

1.30

0.001

Left

1.06

0.52

 

1.06

1.07

 

Mesio-distal mismatch at implant tip in mm

Right

−0.49

0.62

−0.18

−0.50

−0.49

0.010

Left

−0.32

0.53

 

−0.32

−0.31

 

Bucco-lingual mismatch at implant tip in mm

Right

0.52

0.83

0.74

0.51

0.52

<0.001

Left

−0.23

0.71

 

−0.23

−0.22

 

Vertical mismatch at implant tip in mm

Right

−0.44

0.57

−0.08

−0.44

−0.44

0.223

Left

−0.36

0.59

 

−0.36

−0.35

 
  1. Statistically significant p-values are marked in bold font.