Table 4 Mean values and their standard deviations (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-values regarding the gender.

From: Influence of two different printing methods on the accuracy of full-guided implant insertion – a laboratory study in undergraduate dental students

Parameter

Gender

Mean value

±SD

Mean difference

Lower limit 95% CI

Upper limit 95% CI

p-value

Three-dimensional angulation in degrees

Female

2.43

1.48

0.92

2.42

2.44

<0.001

Male

3.35

2.36

 

3.33

3.36

 

Three-dimensional mismatch at implant base in mm

Female

0.79

0.41

0.23

0.78

0.79

<0.001

Male

1.02

0.48

 

1.01

1.02

 

Mesio-distal mismatch at implant base in mm

Female

−0.19

0.33

−0.10

−0.20

−0.19

0.044

Male

−0.29

0.37

 

−0.29

−0.29

 

Bucco-lingual mismatch at implant base in mm

Female

0.03

0.42

0.17

0.03

0.03

0.010

Male

0.20

0.57

 

0.19

0.20

 

Vertical mismatch at implant base in mm

Female

−0.36

0.57

−0.28

−0.37

−0.36

0.001

Male

−0.64

0.53

 

−0.64

−0.63

 

Three-dimensional mismatch at implant tip in mm

Female

1.09

0.53

0.37

1.09

1.10

<0.001

Male

1.46

0.76

 

1.46

1.47

 

Mesio-distal mismatch at implant tip in mm

Female

−0.36

0.57

−0.20

−0.36

−0.35

0.012

Male

−0.56

0.61

 

−0.57

−0.56

 

Bucco-lingual mismatch at implant tip in mm

Female

0.07

0.76

0.31

0.07

0.08

0.011

Male

0.38

1.10

 

0.37

0.39

 

Vertical mismatch at implant tip in mm

Female

−0.33

0.58

−0.28

−0.34

−0.33

0.001

Male

−0.61

0.53

 

−0.62

−0.61

 
  1. Statistically significant p-values are marked in bold font.