Table 1 Rates of clinical trial eligibility reported from real-world and registry studies of patients with MM.

From: Management of patients with multiple myeloma beyond the clinical-trial setting: understanding the balance between efficacy, safety and tolerability, and quality of life

Reference

Study/Registry

N

Region

Criteria used

Ineligible patients, %

Outcomes: ineligible vs eligible patients

Shah et al.6

Connect MM®

1406

United States

Common exclusion criteria from 24 RCTs, including absence of measurable disease, inadequate renal/hepatic/hematologic function, ECOG performance status 3/4, and history of other malignancy

40.0–56.8a

3-Year OS: 63% vs 70% (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.99, p = 0.0392)

Fiala et al.8

CoMMpass

848

76 Sites worldwide, primarily in the United States, Canada, Italy, and Spain

ECOG performance status 3/4, inadequate renal/hematologic function

22

91% Increase in risk of progression or death in ineligible patients (adjusted HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45–2.52, p < 0.0001)

Chari et al.7

EHR database analysis

1265

United States

Eligibility criteria for ASPIRE, TOURMALINE-MM1, POLLUX, ELOQUENT-2, CASTOR, ENDEAVOR

47.9–72.3

With Rd treatment: 3-year OS: 63.5% vs 74.7% (mortality HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03–2.07, p = 0.0329) With Vd treatment: 3-year OS: 46.2% vs 61.0% (mortality HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14–2.01, p = 0.0045)

Knauf et al.9

German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms

285

Germany

Heart failure, renal failure, other renal diseases, liver diseases, polyneuropathy, HIV positive

32

3-Year PFS: 18.8% vs 39.9%

3-year OS: 44.4% vs 69.4%

2-year DSS: 69.3% vs 88.4%

Hungria et al.10

INSIGHT MM

3201

EMEA 50.4%, North America 31.3%, Latin America 11.5%, Asia-Pacific 6.8%

20 Standard RCT ineligibility criteria, including inadequate renal/hepatic/hematologic function, ECOG performance status >2, hypercalcemia, cardiac medical history, chronic pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, and history of other malignancy

39.2

Median TTNT (patients with CRAB symptoms):

NDMM patients: 18.0 months vs NE

RRMM patients: 14.9 vs 21.2 months

Klausen et al.11

Danish Multiple Myeloma Registry

1425

Denmark

Common eligibility criteria for non-transplant/elderly patients in the HOVON 87, VISTA, FIRST, and SWOG S0777 phase 3 studies

63.4

Median OS: 21.3 vs 44.0 months (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5–1.9, p < 0.0001)

    

Common eligibility criteria for non-transplant/elderly patients in the ALCYONE phase 3 study

66.2

HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5–1.9, p < 0.0001

  

764

Denmark

Common eligibility criteria for transplant-eligible patients in the STaMINA, IFM2013–04, IFM DFCI 2009, and EMN02 phase 3 studies

54.8

Median OS: 65.5 vs 78.4 months (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.5, p = 0.021)

  1. aDependent on criteria applied to the analysis. Information at time of submission from https://themmrf.org/finding-a-cure/our-work/the-mmrf-commpass-study/.
  2. CI confidence interval, CRAB hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, bone disease; DSS disease-specific survival, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, EHR electronic health record, EMEA Europe, the Middle East, and Africa; HR hazard ratio, NDMM newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, NE not estimable, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, RCT randomized controlled trial, Rd lenalidomide-dexamethasone, RRMM relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, TTNT time to next therapy, Vd bortezomib-dexamethasone.