Table 1 Baseline and Prior Treatment Characteristics of Patients With R/R AML in the CHRYSALIS and ADMIRAL Trials.

From: Clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia treated with gilteritinib who received prior midostaurin or sorafenib

Characteristic

CHRYSALIS 120-/200-mg Gilteritinib

ADMIRAL 120-mg Gilteritinib vs salvage chemotherapy

Prior TKI (n = 33)

No Prior TKI (n = 112)

Gilteritinib

Salvage chemotherapy

Prior TKI (n = 33)

No Prior TKI (n = 214)

Prior TKI (n = 15)

No Prior TKI (n = 109)

Median age, years (range)

56 (24–84)

61 (22–87)

55 (20–82)

62.5 (22–84)

64 (34–78)

61 (19–85)

Female, n (%)

18 (55)

59 (53)

14 (42)

117 (55)

9 (60)

61 (56)

ECOG performance status, n (%)

0–1

22 (67)

87 (78)

25 (76)

181 (85)

14 (93)

91 (84)

≥2

11 (33)

25 (22)

8 (24)

33 (15)

1 (7)

18 (17)

FLT3 mutation type, n (%)

FLT3-ITD only

29 (88)

94 (84)

24 (73)

191 (89)

14 (93)

99 (91)

FLT3-TKD only

0

9 (8)

5 (15)

16 (8)

1 (7)

9 (8)

FLT3-ITD and -TKD

4 (12)

7 (6)

4 (12)

3 (1)

0

0

Other/unknown/missing

0

2 (2)

0

4 (2)

0

1 (0.9)

Cytogenetic risk status, n (%)

Favorable

0

4 (4)

0

4 (2)

0

1 (0.9)

Intermediate

23 (70)

78 (70)

30 (91)

152 (71)

14 (93)

75 (69)

Unfavorable

4 (12)

14 (13)

3 (9)

23 (11)

1 (7)

10 (9)

Other/unknown/missing

6 (18)

16 (14)

0

35 (16)

0

23 (21)

Response to first-line therapy, n (%)

Relapsed

22 (67)

74 (66)

19 (61)

130 (61)

12 (80)

64 (59)

Primary refractory

11 (33)

38 (34)

14 (42)

84 (39)

3 (20)

45 (41)

Prior lines of therapy, n (%)

1

3 (9)

42 (38)

33 (100)

215 (100)

15 (100)

109 (100)

2

6 (18)

36 (32)

0

0

0

0

≥3

24 (73)

34 (30)

0

0

0

0

Prior TKI, n (%)

Midostaurin

0

NA

14 (42)

NA

9 (60)

NA

Sorafenib

33 (100)

 

19 (58)

 

6 (40)

 

Prior HSCT, n (%)

Yes

14 (42)

34 (30)

10 (30)

38 (18)

4 (27)

22 (20)

No

19 (58)

78 (70)

23 (69)

176 (82)

11 (73)

87 (80)

On-study HSCT, n (%)

Yes

6 (18)

24 (21)

5 (15)

59 (28)

0

19 (17)

No

27 (82)

88 (79)

29 (88)

155 (72)

15 (100)

90 (83)

Posttransplant gilteritinib maintenance therapy, n (%)

Yes

0

12

4

36

NA

NA

No

6

12

1

23

NA

NA

Molecular Profile of Patients in the ADMIRAL Trial

FLT3-ITD allelic ratioa, n (%)

n = 28

n = 194

n = 14

n = 99

High

14 (50)

95 (49)

6 (43)

54 (55)

Low

14 (50)

99 (51)

8 (57)

45 (45)

Co-mutations, n (%)

n = 32

n = 207

n = 14

n = 108

NPM1

15 (47)

100 (48)

9 (64)

49 (45)

DNMT3A

9 (28)

66 (32)

6 (43)

34 (31)

DNMT3A and NPM1

7 (22)

48 (23)

4 (29)

27 (25)

WT1

10 (31)

35 (17)

4 (29)

16 (15)

IDH1 or IDH2

4 (13)

34 (16)

4 (29)

14 (13)

  1. aMeasured as the ratio of FLT3-ITD to FLT3 wild-type for all patients with a centrally confirmed FLT3-ITD mutation. A high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was greater than or equal to the median value of 0.77 and a low FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was less than the median value of 0.77.
  2. AML acute myeloid leukemia, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IRT interactive response technology, ITD internal tandem duplication, NA not applicable, R/R relapsed or refractory, TKD tyrosine kinase domain, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor.