Table 1 Baseline characteristics by treatment group.

From: A non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison of lenalidomide + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP for MYC-rearranged DLBCL patients

 

R-CHOP (N = 56)

R2CHOP (N = 77)

Total (N = 133)

p-value

Age at incidence (years)

   

0.018a

 Median

70

63

66

 

 IQR

57–75

54–72

56–73

 

 Range

29–88

28–82

28–88

 

Sex

   

0.271b

 Male

34 (60.7%)

54 (70.1%)

88 (66.2%)

 

 Female

22 (39.3%)

23 (29.9%)

45 (33.8%)

 

Ann Arbor stage

   

0.172c

 2

12 (21.4%)

10 (13.0%)

22 (16.5%)

 

 3

12 (21.4%)

11 (14.3%)

23 (17.3%)

 

 4

32 (57.1%)

56 (72.7%)

88 (66.2%)

 

WHO performance score

   

0.013c

 0

22 (41.5%)

47 (61.0%)

69 (53.1%)

 

 1

16 (30.2%)

24 (31.2%)

40 (30.8%)

 

 2

10 (18.9%)

5 (6.5%)

15 (11.5%)

 

 3

5 (9.4%)

1 (1.3%)

6 (4.6%)

 

 (Missing)

3

0

3

 

WHO PS (grouped)

   

0.006c

 0

22 (41.5%)

47 (61.0%)

69 (53.1%)

 

 1

16 (30.2%)

24 (31.2%)

40 (30.8%)

 

 2 or 3

15 (28.3%)

6 (7.8%)

21 (16.2%)

 

 (Missing)

3

0

3

 

LDH

   

0.693b

 Within normal range

16 (28.6%)

19 (25.0%)

35 (26.5%)

 

 Elevated

40 (71.4%)

57 (75.0%)

97 (73.5%)

 

 (Missing)

0

1

1

 

Extra-nodal localizations

   

0.300c

 None

12 (21.4%)

23 (29.9%)

35 (26.3%)

 

 1

22 (39.3%)

21 (27.3%)

43 (32.3%)

 

 2 or more

22 (39.3%)

33 (42.9%)

55 (41.4%)

 

IPI risk group

   

0.013c

 Low

12 (21.8%)

9 (11.8%)

21 (16.0%)

 

 Low-intermediate

8 (14.5%)

22 (28.9%)

30 (22.9%)

 

 High-intermediate

13 (23.6%)

29 (38.2%)

42 (32.1%)

 

 High

22 (40.0%)

16 (21.1%)

38 (29.0%)

 

 (Missing)

1

1

2

 

IPI Risk (3 Groups)

   

0.004c

 Low

12 (21.8%)

9 (11.7%)

21 (15.9%)

 

 Intermediate

21 (38.2%)

52 (67.5%)

73 (55.3%)

 

 High

22 (40.0%)

16 (20.8%)

38 (28.8%)

 

 (Missing)

1

0

1

 

COO IHC (Hans classification)

   

0.999b

 GCB subtype

45 (80.4%)

62 (80.5%)

107 (80.4%)

 

 Non-GCB subtype

5 (8.9%)

8 (10.3%)

13 (9.8%)

 

 Not evaluable

6 (13.3%)

7 (9.1%)

13 (9.8%)

 

Rearrangement

   

0.0832

 Single hit

20 (35.7%)

18 (23.4%)

38 (28.6%)

 

 Double/triple hit

26 (46.4%)

51 (66.2%)

77 (57.9%)

 

 Missing BCL2/BCL6

10 (17.9%)

8 (10.4%)

18 (13.5%)

 

Days before start treatment

   

0.317a

 Median

15.0

19.0

17.0

 

 IQR

10.8–23.8

11.0–26.0

11.0–26.0

 

 Range

5.0–84.0

0.0–69.0

0.0–84.0

 

Response

   

0.556c

 Complete remission

37 (69.8%)

62 (80.5%)

99 (76.2%)

 

 Partial remission

11 (20.8%)

11 (14.3%)

22 (16.9%)

 

 Stable disease

1 (1.9%)

1 (1.3%)

2 (1.5%)

 

 Progressive disease

4 (7.5%)

3 (3.9%)

7 (5.4%)

 

 (Missing)

3

0

3

 

Response (grouped)

   

0.209b

 Complete remission

37 (69.8%)

62 (80.5%)

99 (76.2%)

 

 No complete remission

16 (30.2%)

15 (19.5%)

31 (23.8%)

 

 (Missing)

3

0

3

 
  1. aKruskal–Wallis rank sum test.
  2. bFisher’s Exact Test for Count Data.
  3. cTrend test for ordinal variables.