Table 3 Hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific hazard ratios for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

From: Transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score predicts allo-HCT outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

 

5-year OS

5-year PFS

5-year CIR

5-year NRM

 
 

HR (95% CI)

(Overall) p-value

HR (95% CI)

(Overall) p-value

HR (95% CI)

(Overall) p-value

HR (95% CI)

(Overall) p-value

TCI index*

Low

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Int/High

1.12 (0.97–1.30)

0.13

1.00 (0.88–1.14)

0.95

0.74 (0.61–0.91)

0.004

1.24 (1.04–1.48)

0.02

Conditioning intensity*

RIC

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

MAC

1.03 (0.87–1.20)

0.76

1.00 (0.87–1.15)

0.97

0.83 (0.67–1.04)

0.10

1.16 (0.96–1.39)

0.13

Age at allo-HCT (per 10 years older)

1.35 (1.24–1.48)

<0.0001

1.19 (1.10–1.28)

<0.0001

0.94 (0.84–1.05)

0.25

1.44 (1.30–1.60)

<0.0001

Donor type

 

(0.002)

 

(0.03)

 

(0.75)

 

(0.0008)

HLA-matched related

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Unrelated (10/10)

1.16 (0.99–1.35)

0.07

1.02 (0.88–1.17)

0.83

0.92 (0.75–1.13)

0.43

1.11 (0.92–1.33)

0.28

Unrelated (9/10)

1.49 (1.20–1.85)

0.0003

1.28 (1.06–1.55)

0.01

0.95 (0.69–1.29)

0.74

1.62 (1.26–2.08)

0.0001

Year of allo-HCT (per year later)

1.00 (0.97–1.03)

0.97

0.99 (0.97–1.02)

0.47

0.98 (0.94–1.02)

0.29

1.00 (0.97–1.04)

0.88

HCT–CI at allo-HCT

 

(0.006)

 

(0.03)

 

(0.28)

 

(0.10)

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Intermediate risk

1.22 (1.02–1.46)

0.03

1.07 (0.91–1.26)

0.40

0.99 (0.77–1.27)

0.92

1.14 (0.93–1.41)

0.21

High risk

1.33 (1.11–1.58)

0.001

1.25 (1.07–1.46)

0.005

1.20 (0.94–1.53)

0.14

1.29 (1.05–1.58)

0.02

KPS at allo-HCT

90 or 100

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

≤80

1.44 (1.25–1.66)

<0.0001

1.27 (1.11–1.44)

0.0003

1.19 (0.98–1.46)

0.08

1.35 (1.14–1.60)

0.0006

DIPSS

 

(0.02)

 

(0.09)

 

(0.13)

 

(0.04)

Low (0)

0.65 (0.38–1.11)

0.12

0.76 (0.48–1.18)

0.22

1.10 (0.60–2.02)

0.76

0.53 (0.27–1.05)

0.07

Low-intermediate risk (1–2)

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

High-intermediate risk (3–4)

1.04 (0.87–1.24)

0.68

1.05 (0.90–1.23)

0.53

1.34 (1.05–1.70)

0.02

0.88 (0.71–1.09)

0.25

High risk (5–6)

1.33 (1.08–1.64)

0.007

1.23 (1.02–1.48)

0.03

1.24 (0.90–1.70)

0.18

1.20 (0.94–1.52)

0.14

CMV status patient/donor

+/–

1.14 (0.97–1.35)

0.10

1.10 (0.95–1.27)

0.21

0.90 (0.71–1.15)

0.40

1.23 (1.03–1.49)

0.03

Other

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Driver mutation

 

(0.009)

 

(0.0006)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.05)

JAK2

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

CALR

0.79 (0.62–0.99)

0.04

0.74 (0.60–0.91)

0.004

0.64 (0.45–0.90)

0.01

0.82 (0.63–1.07)

0.14

MPL

0.60 (0.36–1.00)

0.05

0.58 (0.37–0.90)

0.01

0.45 (0.21–0.95)

0.04

0.70 (0.41–1.21)

0.20

Triple-negative

0.83 (0.55–1.25)

0.37

0.87 (0.61–1.26)

0.47

1.02 (0.61–1.71)

0.94

0.76 (0.45–1.28)

0.30

ATG use

No

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Yes

0.94 (0.79–1.12)

0.50

1.02 (0.88–1.19)

0.78

1.23 (0.97–1.55)

0.09

0.90 (0.73–1.09)

0.28

  1. * Results for conditioning intensity according to RIC/MAC and TCI index each endpoint were obtained using 2 separate models including either RIC/MAC or TCI index grouping. The results of other variables in the model are those of the model including TCI index grouping. These were very similar to those including RIC/MAC grouping. Overall p-values were obtained using the log-likelihood ratio test. Missing values in a variable were modeled using a separate ‘missing’ category (not shown). 
  2. TCI Transplant Conditioning Intensity, MAC myeloablative conditioning, RIC reduced intensity conditioning, HCT-CI Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index, KPS Karnofsky Performance Score, DIPSS Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, CMV cytomegalovirus, ATG anti-thymocyte globulin.
  3. Statistically significant p-values are in bold