Table 2 Descriptive analysis of group data for all students in both cohorts in relation to tooth surface, number of teeth restored in a quadrant and mean difficulty of all the teeth restored; values are median (min-max) unless otherwise stated

From: Is the number of procedures completed a valid indicator of final year student competency in operative dentistry?

Group

(completed restorations; number of students)

1

(40-49; n = 27)

2

(50-59; n = 55)

3

(60-69; n = 27)

4

(>70; n = 26)

Total

(n = 139)

Surface

Approximal anterior

7 (2-14)

8 (2-21)

11 (2-17)

13 (6-25)

9 (2-25)

Approximal posterior

12 (4-21)

14 (7-33)

16 (7-29)

16 (6-30)

14 (4-33)

Incisal edge

3 (0-24)

4 (0-31)

9 (0-22)

7 (0-37)

6 (0-37)

Smooth surface

11 (2-19)

12 (2-23)

14 (5-37)

23 (6-43)

13 (2-43)

Occlusal surface

5 (2-11)

8 (2-17)

8 (2-14)

10 (1-21)

7 (0-21)

Quadrant

1

12 (8-22)

15 (3-25)

18 (8-30)

18 (11-38)

15 (3-38)

2

14 (7-23)

15 (6-31)

12 (8-28)

12 (14-37)

16 (4-37)

3

11 (2-16)

12 (3-23)

16 (7-23)

18 (12-28)

13 (2-28)

4

10 (4-16)

12 (4-21)

13 (4-24)

18 (11-27)

12 (3-27)

Difficulty n (mean ± SD)

27.81 (± 6.49)

31.45 (± 6.36)

36.81 (± 7.03)

43.12 (± 8.78)

34.04 (± 8.75)

Difficulty % (mean ± SD)

60.11 (± 12.71)

57.65 (± 11.02)

57.29 (± 10.61)

54.45 (± 10.27)

56.32 (± 11.09)

  1. Note:
  2. Where restoration experience across both cohorts was lower than 40 (n = 4), results were excluded from group-level analysis.