Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research
  • Published:

An evaluation of referrer factors for 98,671 referrals made to the West Yorkshire oral surgery managed clinical network over a three-year period

Abstract

Introduction Patients referred from primary dental care to hospital-based specialists in high volumes can contribute to significant NHS service pressures. Surprisingly, little is understood about what contributes to referral factors.

Aims To gain new insight into the referral factors from primary dental care by interrogating the tri-speciality West Yorkshire managed clinical network (MCN) referral pathway data for a 36-month period (2016-2019).

Methods Anonymised referrals from the electronic referral management system were collated for analyses.

Results There were 98,671 referrals within the 36-month period, 12.3% of which were rejected. Of those accepted for triage, 76% were directed at oral surgery, with >60% accounted for by exodontia. In total, 10% of referrers accounted for 60% of all referrals. Peak referral occurred five years after General Dental Council registration.

Discussion This is the first report of referral data from a tri-speciality MCN with exodontia referrals predominating. The data set demonstrates variation in referrer behaviours despite referral guidance. Referrals should be based upon patient need but patterns observed in this study suggested possible associations with high and low referral patterns which warrant further research.

Conclusions Interrogation of the referral database suggests that there are interesting patterns of referral which may be associated with characteristics of the referrer as well as their patients' needs. Further investigation could inform improved processes and service design, as well as education delivery and workforce development.

Key points

  • Describes referrals for a tri-speciality MCN over 36 months with insight into the service demand for oral surgery, oral medicine and maxillofaical surgery in West Yorkshire and highlights referral behaviours showing that 60% of all referrals are accounted for by 10% of referrers.

  • Oral surgery referrals accounted for over 75% of all referrals of which the majority were exodontia. Almost 20% of all referrals were in the 'other' category.

  • Highlights the need for further studies both of a quantitative and qualitative nature to better understand referrer behaviours and how these impact on future service design and workforce training.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NHS England. Five Year Forward View. 2014 Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed February 2022).

  2. Skipper M. Managed clinical networks. Br Dent J 2010; 209: 241-242.

  3. NHS England. Guide for Commissioning Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine Specialties. 2015. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/09/guid-comms-oral.pdf (accessed February 2022).

  4. Walford S. Choose and Book. Clin Med (Lond) 2006; 6: 473-476.

  5. Goldthorpe J, Walsh T, Tickle M et al. An evaluation of a referral management and triage system for oral surgery referrals from primary care dentists: a mixed-methods study. Health Ser Deliv Res 2018; DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06080.

  6. Montgomery-Cranny J, Edmondson M, Reid J, Eapen-Simon S, Hegarty A M, Mighell A J. Development of a managed clinical network in oral medicine. Br Dent J 2017; 223: 719-725.

  7. Health Educatiuon England. Advancing Dental Care Review. 2019. Available at https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/advancing-dental-care (accessed February 2022).

  8. Fullarton M, Martin I, Begley A, Magennis P. Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) - the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Report: what happens next? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57: 393-394.

  9. General Dental Council. Annual Report and Accounts 2019. 2020. Available at https://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/annual-reports/gdc-annual-report-and-accounts-2019.pdf (accessed February 2022).

  10. Moore A T, Roland M O. How much variation in referral rates among general practitioners is due to chance? BMJ 1989; 298: 500-502.

  11. Coulthard P, Kazakou I, Koron R, Worthington H V. Referral patterns and the referral system for oral surgery care. Part 1: General dental practitioner referral patterns. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 142-145.

  12. Patel J, Fox K, Grieveson B, Youngson C C. Undergraduate training as preparation for vocational training in England: a survey of vocational dental practitioners' and their trainers' views. Br Dent J 2006; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814067.

  13. Brown J, Baker R, Moore R. An investigation into the oral surgery curriculum and undergraduate experience in a sample of DFT's in the UK. Eur J Dent Educ 2021; 25: 421-434.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The main author is Richard Moore, with equal contributions from Gail Douglas and Iain Pretty. Alan Mighell is the supervising and advisory author for the group.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Moore.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, R., Pretty, I., Douglas, G. et al. An evaluation of referrer factors for 98,671 referrals made to the West Yorkshire oral surgery managed clinical network over a three-year period. Br Dent J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4034-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4034-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links