Table 1 The risk of bias ratings for included studies using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports
Study | Were the patient's demographic characteristics clearly described? | Was the patient's history clearly described and presented as a timeline? | Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? | Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results described clearly? | Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? | Was the postintervention clinical condition clearly described? | Were adverse events or unanticipated events described if appropriate? | Does the case report provide take away lesson? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altamura et al.14 | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
Colvenkar et al.15 | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
Eli and Kleinhauz16 | + | + | + | ? | + | ? | + | + |
Kavaz et al.17 | + | ? | + | ? | + | ? | + | + |
Newton & Emanuel18 | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
Ramazani et al.19 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Savage & MacGregor20 | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
Singer21 | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + |
Key: + = yes - = no ? = unclear Note: The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports is used descriptively and does not provide a summed score. Ratings indicate the presence or absence of key methodological criteria but are not used to calculate an overall study quality rating. | ||||||||