Table 3 One-stage and two-stage results for childhood leukaemia comparing < 50 m with 300 + m distance with closest overhead power line

From: Proximity to overhead power lines and childhood leukaemia: an international pooled analysis

 

Any voltage

200 + kV

Study

Ca/Co

OR (95% CI)

Ca/Co

OR (95% CI)

Included

  Brazil

5/11

1.64 (0.54–4.95)

3/1

9.05 (0.89–91.90)

  Denmark

0/2

0/0

  France

23/213

1.17 (0.75–1.81)

9/60

1.62 (0.80–3.30)

  Italy1

2/2

4.27 (0.57–31.91)

0/0

  Italy2

1/4

1.00 (0.10–9.63)

0/0

  Norway

8/43

0.70 (0.31–1.56)

0/6

  Sweden

4/8

2.72 (0.45–16.57)

4/8

2.72 (0.45–16.57)

  Switzerland

34/199

0.88 (0.61–1.28)

5/20

1.34 (0.50–3.59)

  Tasmania

1/0

0/0

 United Kingdom

22/34

0.82 (0.49–1.40)

6/13

0.56 (0.21–1.47)

 United States

97/89

1.07 (0.80–1.43)

23/15

1.50 (0.78–2.88)

 Two-stage (meta-analysis)

 

1.02 (0.85–1.22)

 

1.41 (0.88–2.24)

 One-stage (pooled analysis)

 

1.01 (0.85–1.21)

 

1.33 (0.92–1.93)

Not included

 Japan

 

3.06 (1.31–7.13)

 

 Finland

 

1.47 (0.33–6.57)

 

 Meta-analysis of all studies

 

1.10 (0.88–1.38)

 

  1. Ca cases, CI confidence interval, Co controls, OR odds ratio, SES socioeconoic status.
  2. Denmark and Tasmania had no observations in < 50 m category for any voltage. Italy1, Italy2 and Norway had no observations in the < 50 m category for 200 + kV.
  3. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex (where available) and SES.
  4. Numbers can differ slightly from original publication due to different exclusion criteria