Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the review

From: Assessment of proportional hazard assumption in aggregate data: a systematic review on statistical methodology in clinical trials using time-to-event endpoint

 

Excluded from statistical analysis (N = 57)

Included in statistical analysis (N = 58)

Total (N = 115)

N

%

N

%

N

%

Phase

  I–II

1

2

0

0

1

1

  II

19

33

19

33

38

33

  II–III

1

2

1

2

2

2

  III

36

63

38

65

74

64

Type of study—centre

  Multicentre

43

75

57

98

100

87

  Single centre

14

25

1

2

15

13

Blinding

  Yes

10

18

22

38

32

28

  No

47

82

36

62

83

72

Primary Endpoint

  OS

32

56

24

41

56

49

  PFS

20

35

32

55

52

45

  TTF

1

2

0

0

1

1

  TTP

4

7

2

4

6

5

Proportionality assessed

  Yes

2a

4

2

3

4

3

  No

55

96

56

97

111

97

Sample size calculation

  Number of events reported

25

44

45

78

70

61

  Only number of patients reported

23

40

9

15

32

28

  Not provided

9

16

4

7

13

11

Reached >95% of target events

  Yes

14

82

26

81

40

82

  No

3

18

6

19

9

18

Number of patients analysed

  Median

302

379

332

  IQR

154–440

175–772

168–595

  Minimum–Maximum

48–1725

60–1433

48–1725

  1. aIn one study the proportionality assumption was informally assessed by looking at the survival functions
  2. N number, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, TTF time to failure, TTP time to progression, IQR interquartile range