Table 3 Pooled Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of DNA methylation assays for detection of CIN2+ and CIN3+

From: Performance of DNA methylation assays for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review and meta-analysis

CIN2+ detection

Model 1a

Model 2b

      
 

Observed prevalence

PPV (95% CI)

Set prevalence

   

5%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

   

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

All studies (n = 38)10,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,42,43,45,46,47,48,49,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,65

36.7%

57.6 (50.3–64.6)

12.1 (10.2–14.0)

22.6 (19.4–25.7)

39.6 (35.3–43.9)

52.9 (48.4–57.4)

63.6 (59.4.3–67.8)

72.4 (68.8–76.0)

p-heterogeneity

 

25.1 (17.1–35.2)

      

Threshold to achieve 70% specificity (n = 24 studies)10,24,25,26,27,28,29,31,33,35,37,39,42,46,48,55,56,56,58,59,60,63,65

35.7%

53.4 (44.4–62.1)

7.2 (4.5–9.8)

14.0 (9.2–18.8)

26.8 (19.0–34.7)

38.6 (29.1–48.1)

49.5 (39.4–59.5)

59.5 (49.8–69.1)

p-heterogeneity

 

27.5 (17.1–41.0)

      

Threshold to achieve 50% specificity (n = 17 studies) specificity10,25,27,28,33,34,35,37,39,42,48,49,55,57,58,60

34.9%

43.8 (35.2–2.7)

7.7 (7.3–8.1)

15.0 (14.2–15.7)

28.4 (27.2–29.6)

40.4 (39.0–41.8)

51.4 (49.9–52.8)

61.3 (59.9–62.7)

p-heterogeneity

 

25.5 (13.8–42.1)

      

CIN3+ detection

Model 1a

Model 2b

      
 

Observed prevalence

PPV (95% CI)

Estimated prevalence

   

5%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

   

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

All studies (n = 30)10,25,26,27,27,29,30,31,32,34,35,38,40,41,42,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,56,58,62,63,65

21.6%

40.8 (33.9–48.0)

12.7 (11.0–14.5)

23.6 (20.8–26.3)

41.0 (37.2–44.7)

54.3 (50.5–58.1)

64.9 (61.4–68.4)

73.5 (70.5– 76.5)

p-heterogeneity

 

17.0 (10.2–27.9)

      

Threshold to achieve 70% specificity (n = 19 studies)10,25,26,27,27,29,31,32,35,41,42,44,46,48,51,53,58,63,65

19.8%

35.0 (28.9–41.6)

11.0 (10.2–11.8)

20.7 (19.4–22.1)

37.0 (35.2–38.9)

50.2 (48.2–52.2)

61.1 (59.1–63.0)

70.2 (68.5–71.9)

p-heterogeneity

 

12.6 (6.0–24.3)

      

Threshold to achieve 50% specificity (n = 14)10,25,27,32,34,35,42,44,48,49,51,58,65

19.0%

26.5 (21.3–32.4)

8.0 (7.5–8.4)

15.5 (14.7–16.3)

29.2 (27.9–30.4)

41.4 (39.9–42.6)

52.3 (50.8–53.8)

62.2 (60.8–63.6)

p-heterogeneity

 

14.1 (5.8–30.4)

      
  1. aModel 1: PPV bivariate model from the observed data
  2. bModel 2: PPV obtained from pooled specifity and sensitivity by study design at different levels of prevalence of disease, PPV=Prev*SE/(Prev*SE+(1-Prev)*(1-Spec))