Table 2 Validation and performance of Model 1 (RMH) and Model 2 (RMH + NLR50) in comparison with the updated Model 3 (NCIS).

From: Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials

Characteristics

Model 1: RMH

Model 2: RMH + NLR50

Model 3: NCIS

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

RMH score

      

    0

1

 

1

 

1

 

    1

1.28 (0.96–1.70)

0.099

1.29 (0.96–1.72)

0.087

1.22 (0.91–1.63)

0.189

    2

2.27 (1.62–3.17)

<0.001

2.16 (1.54–3.02)

<0.001

2.13 (1.51–3.00)

<0.001

    3

4.14 (2.62–6.53)

<0.001

4.05 (2.56–6.39)

<0.001

3.80 (2.40–6.02)

<0.001

NLR50a

      

    ≤3.4

1

 

    >3.4

1.38 (1.08–1.76)

0.009

ECOG PS

      

    0

1

 

    1

1.59 (1.24–2.04)

<0.001

Tumour type

      

    Breast

1

 

    GI malignancies

3.06 (2.16–4.35)

<0.001

    Others

1.81 (1.32–2.45)

<0.001

Harrell C-statistic

0.62 (0.60–0.64)

0.63 (0.62–0.65)

0.67 (0.65–0.69)

3-month AUC (95% CI)b

0.72 (0.63–0.79)

0.71 (0.62–0.79)

0.71 (0.63–0.79)

6-month AUC (95% CI)b

0.65 (0.59–0.71)

0.67 (0.61–0.73)

0.71 (0.65–0.78)

iAUC (95% CI)b

0.67 (0.61–0.72)

0.69 (0.64–0.73)

0.71 (0.65–0.76)

  1. aNLR50 refers to the median NLR value of our population.
  2. b95% CI of AUC(t) and iAUC was generated based on 1000 bootstrap replicates.