Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients based on NY-ESO-1 and p53 antibody status.

From: Serum NY-ESO-1 antibody as a predictive biomarker for postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study

 

NY-ESO-1 antibody (−) (n = 875)

NY-ESO-1 antibody (+) (n = 126)

P value

p53 antibody (−) (n = 820)

p53 antibody (+) (n = 181)

P value

Age, years

72 (34–90)

74 (41–90)

0.012

72 (34–90)

73 (40–90)

0.59

Gender

     Male

599 (68.5%)

105 (83.3%)

0.001

564 (68.8%)

140 (73.3%)

0.022

     Female

276 (31.5%)

21 (16.7%)

 

256 (31.2%)

41 (22.7%)

 

cT

     3

430 (49.1%)

60 (47.6%)

0.75

406 (49.5%)

84 (46.4%)

0.45

     4

445 (50.9%)

66 (52.4%)

 

414 (50.5%)

97 (53.6%)

 

cN

     0

330 (37.7%)

28 (22.2%)

0.006

298 (36.3%)

60 (33.1%)

0.87

     1

259 (29.6%)

43 (34.1%)

 

244 (29.8%)

58 (32.0%)

 

     2

210 (24.0%)

38 (30.2%)

 

202 (24.6%)

46 (25.4%)

 

     3

76 (8.7%)

17 (13.5%)

 

76 (9.3%)

17 (9.4%)

 

cStage

     II

439 (50.2%)

47 (37.3%)

0.026

401 (48.9%)

85 (47.0%)

0.853

     III

407 (46.5%)

74 (58.7%)

 

392 (47.8%)

89 (49.2%)

 

     IV

29 (3.3%)

5 (4.0%)

 

27 (3.3%)

7 (3.9%)

 

Tumor location

     Lower

341 (39.0%)

42 (36.5%)

0.058

312 (38.0%)

71 (39.2%)

0.71

     Middle

322 (36.8%)

41 (33.3%)

 

302 (36.8%)

61 (33.7%)

 

     Upper

212 (24.2%)

43 (30.2%)

 

206 (25.1%)

49(27.1%)

 

Histological typea

     Differentiated

396 (45.3%)

73 (57.9%)

0.068

378 (46.1%)

91 (50.3%)

0.60

     Undifferentiated

383 (43.8%)

42 (33.3%)

 

356 (43.4%)

69 (38.1%)

 

     Others

45 (5.1%)

5 (4.0%)

 

41 (5.0%)

9 (5.0%)

 

     No dissection

51 (5.8%)

6 (4.8%)

 

45 (5.5%)

12 (6.6%)

 

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

     No

783 (89.5%)

115 (91.3%)

0.54

738 (90.0%)

160 (88.4%)

0.52

     Yes

92 (10.5%)

11 (8.7%)

 

82 (10.0%)

21 (11.6%)

 

Surgical curability

     R0

680 (77.7%)

98 (77.8%)

0.74

647 (78.9%)

131 (72.4%)

0.24

     R1

95 (10.9%)

14 (11.1%)

 

83 (10.1%)

26 (14.4%)

 

     R2

98 (11.2%)

13 (10.3%)

 

88 (10.7%)

23 (12.7%)

 

     No operation

2 (0.2%)

1 (0.8%)

 

2 (0.2%)

1 (0.6%)

 

pTb

     0

6 (0.7%)

1 (0.8%)

0.006

7 (0.9%)

0 (0%)

0.31

     1

82 (10.0%)

6 (5.0%)

 

77 (9.9%)

11 (6.5%)

 

     2

93 (11.3%)

25 (20.8%)

 

92 (11.9%)

26 (15.4%)

 

     3

299 (36.3%)

51 (42.5%)

 

285 (36.8%)

65 (38.5%)

 

     4

344 (41.7%)

37 (30.8%)

 

314 (40.5%)

67 (39.6%)

 

pNb

     0

267 (32.4%)

28 (23.3%)

0.065

243 (31.4%)

52 (30.8%)

0.80

     1

150 (18.2%)

25 (20.8%)

 

146 (18.8%)

29 (17.2%)

 

     2

160 (19.4%)

19 (15.8%)

 

149 (19.2%)

30 (17.8%)

 

     3

247 (30.0%)

48 (40.0%)

 

237 (30.6%)

58 (34.3%)

 

pStageb

     0

6 (0.7%)

1 (0.8%)

0.82

7 (0.9%)

0 (0%)

0.15

     I

124 (15.0%)

13 (10.8%)

 

116 (15.0%)

21 (12.4%)

 

     II

242 (29.4%)

37 (30.8%)

 

225 (29.0%)

54 (32.0%)

 

     III

319 (38.7%)

48 (40.0%)

 

309 (39.9%)

58 (34.3%)

 

     IV

133 (16.1%)

21 (17.5%)

 

118 (15.2)

36 (21.3%)

 

Adjuvant chemotherapy

     No

783 (89.5%)

115 (91.3%)

0.54

738 (90.0%)

160 (88.4%)

0.52

     Yes

92 (10.5%)

11 (8.7%)

 

82 (10.0%)

21 (11.6%)

 
  1. Data are shown as the number of patients (%) or the median (min–max). The TNM stage was classified according to the 14th edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma.26
  2. aDifferentiated: pap/tub1/tub2, Undifferentiated: por/sig, Others: muc/NEC/carcinoma with lymphoid stroma/hepatoid adenocarcinoma/undifferentiated carcinoma.
  3. bPathological data are shown only for dissected patients.