Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies

The road to tailored adjuvant chemotherapy for all four non-pancreatic periampullary cancers: An international multimethod cohort study

Abstract

Background

Despite differences in tumour behaviour and characteristics between duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC), the intestinal (AmpIT) and pancreatobiliary (AmpPB) subtype of ampullary adenocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on these cancers, as well as the optimal ACT regimen, has not been comprehensively assessed. This study aims to assess the influence of tailored ACT on DAC, dCCA, AmpIT, and AmpPB.

Patients and methods

Patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma were identified and collected from 36 tertiary centres between 2010 - 2021. Per non-pancreatic periampullary tumour type, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the main relevant regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Results

The study included a total of 2866 patients with DAC (n = 330), AmpIT (n = 765), AmpPB (n = 819), and dCCA (n = 952). Among them, 1329 received ACT, and 1537 did not. ACT was associated with significant improvement in OS for AmpPB (P = 0.004) and dCCA (P < 0.001). Moreover, for patients with dCCA, capecitabine mono ACT provided the greatest OS benefit compared to gemcitabine (P = 0.004) and gemcitabine – cisplatin (P = 0.001). For patients with AmpPB, no superior ACT regime was found (P > 0.226). ACT was not associated with improved OS for DAC and AmpIT (P = 0.113 and P = 0.445, respectively).

Discussion

Patients with resected AmpPB and dCCA appear to benefit from ACT. While the optimal ACT for AmpPB remains undetermined, it appears that dCCA shows the most favourable response to capecitabine monotherapy. Tailored adjuvant treatments are essential for enhancing prognosis across all four non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Methodology with summary of inclusions and comparisons.
Fig. 2: Duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Fig. 3: Ampullary adenocarcinoma intestinal subtype.
Fig. 4: Ampullary adenocarcinoma pancreatobiliary.
Fig. 5: Distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Due to the sensitive nature of the research and the privacy of participants involved, the data supporting the findings of this study are not publicly available. Data can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to compliance with applicable privacy laws and ethical guidelines.

References

  1. Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Kim GE, Krasinskas A, Balci S, et al. Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1592–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerch MM, Domschke W. Abraham Vater of the ampulla (papilla) of Vater. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarmiento JM, Nagomey DM, Sarr MG, Farnell MB. Periampullary cancers: are there differences? Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81:543–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, Smyrk TC, Zhang L, Qin R, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg. 2008;247:456–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Han SS, Jang JY, Kim SW, Kim WH, Lee KU, Park YH. Analysis of long-term survivors after surgical resection for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2006;32:271–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, Winter JM, Assumpcao L, Lillemoe KD, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141:610–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zacharias T, Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Neuville A, Bachellier P. Impact of lymph node involvement on long-term survival after R0 Pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:350–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stark AP, Sacks GD, Rochefort MM, Donahue TR, Reber HA, Tomlinson JS, et al. Long-term survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2016;159:1520–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdmann JI, Eskens FA, Vollmer CM, Kok NF, Groot Koerkamp B, Biermann K, et al. Histological and molecular subclassification of pancreatic and nonpancreatic periampullary cancers: Implications for (Neo) adjuvant systemic treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2401–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura W, Futakawa N, Yamagata S, Wada Y, Kuroda A, Muto T, et al. Different clinicopathologic findings in two histologic types of carcinoma of Papilla of Vater. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research. 1994;85:161–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura W, Futakawa N, Zhao B Neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-004-0894-7 (2004).

  13. Moekotte AL, Lof S, van Roessel S, Fontana M, Dreyer S, Shablak A, et al. Histopathologic predictors of survival and recurrence in resected ampullary Adenocarcinoma: International Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2020;272:1086–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Bloomston M. Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:991–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Winter JM, Campbell KA, Hruban RH, et al. Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery. 2006;140:764–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn DH, Bekaii-Saab T Ampullary cancer: an overview. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book: 112-5 (2014).

  17. Conroy T, Castan F, Lopez A, Turpin A, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, et al. Five-year outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1571.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizzo A, Brandi G. BILCAP trial and adjuvant capecitabine in resectable biliary tract cancer: reflections on a standard of care. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15:483–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Overman MJ, Varadhachary GR, Kopetz S, Adinin R, Lin E, Morris JS, et al. Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and ampulla of Vater. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2598–603.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, et al. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308:147–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolm L, Ohrner K, Nappo G, Ruckert F, Zimmermann C, Rau BM, et al. Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival in patients with pancreatobiliary or mixed subtype ampullary cancer after pancreatoduodenectomy - A multicenter cohort study. Pancreatology. 2020;20:433–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moekotte AL, Malleo G, van Roessel S, Bonds M, Halimi A, Zarantonello L, et al. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma: international propensity score-matched cohort study. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1171–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss JM, Gupta S, Burke CA, Axell L, Chen LM, Chung DC, et al. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Colorectal, version 1.2021 featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2021;19:1122–32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:S31–S34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ament R. Origin of the ASA classification. Anesthesiology. 1979;51:179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. WHO Classiication of Tumours Editorial Board. Digestive system tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 1)…

  29. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Markov P, Satoi S, Kon M. Redefining the R1 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:523–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meijer LL, Alberga AJ, de Bakker JK, van der Vliet HJ, Le Large TYS, van Grieken NCT, et al. Outcomes and treatment options for duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2681–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, et al. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2395–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, et al. Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M, Uesaka K, Tsuchiya Y, Ohtsuka M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:192–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P, Fouet M, Boutron I. Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure: a methodological systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:901–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. de Bakker JK, Meijer LL, Zonderhuis BM, van der Vliet HJ, Daams F, van Grieken NCT et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected duodenal adenocarcinoma: a case-matched analysis in nation wide cohort. Acta Chir Belg: 1–7 (2022).

  38. Chiorean EG, Chiaro MDel, Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Benson AB, Cardin DB, et al. Ampullary Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2023;21:753–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roos E, Strijker M, Franken LC, Busch OR, van Hooft JE, Klümpen H-J, et al. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between anatomical subtypes of resected biliary tract cancer in a Western high-volume center. HPB. 2020;22:405–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Belkouz A, Van Roessel S, Strijker M, van Dam JL, Daamen L, van der Geest LG, et al. Development and external validation of a prediction model for overall survival after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01687-1 (2022).

  41. Wellner UF, Shen Y, Keck T, Jin W, Xu Z. The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival. Surg Today. 2017;47:271–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, Watelet J, Hammel P, Joly JP, et al. Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): A Randomized Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:658–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Edeline J, Hirano S, Bertaut A, Konishi M, Benabdelghani M, Uesaka K, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer: combined analysis of the BCAT and PRODIGE-12 studies. Eur J Cancer. 2022;164:80–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shroff RT, Kennedy EB, Bachini M, Bekaii-Saab T, Crane C, Edeline J, et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1015–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakachi K, Konishi M, Ikeda M, Mizusawa J, Eba J, Okusaka T, et al. A randomized Phase III trial of adjuvant S-1 therapy vs. observation alone in resected biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1202, ASCOT). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018;48:392–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stein A, Arnold D, Bridgewater J, Goldstein D, Jensen LH, Klumpen HJ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared to observation after curative intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma and muscle invasive gallbladder carcinoma (ACTICCA-1 trial) - a randomized, multidisciplinary, multinational phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:564.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Body A, Prenen H, Latham S, Lam M, Tipping-Smith S, Raghunath A, et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;ume 13:2567–79.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gumbs AA, Croner R, Abu-Hilal M, Bannone E, Ishizawa T, Spolverato G, et al. Surgomics and the Artificial intelligence, Radiomics, Genomics, Oncopathomics and Surgomics (AiRGOS) Project. Artificial Intelligence Surgery. 2023;3:180–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No specific funding needed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Study conception and design: BU, DL, MG, HW, AZ, CF, MB, MA. Acquisition of data: GF, AZ, BK, ML, PG, RS, SW, BI, WG, UB, GK, MH, VM, BB, MM, MS, DK, AA, KR, ZS, PP, WF, SK, TK, MV, LB, NJ, RD, JK, AM, MM, SC, CB, AB, Analysis and interpretation of data: BU, DL, MG, HW, AZ, CF, MB, MA. Drafting of manuscript: BU, DL, MG, HW, AZ, CF, MB, MA. Critical revision: BU, DL, MG, HW, AZ, GF, AZ, BK, ML, PG, RS, SW, BI, WG, UB, GK, MH, VM, BB, MM, MS, DK, AA, KR, ZS, PP, WF, SK, TK, MV, LB, NJ, RD, JK, AM, MM, SC, CB, AB, CF, MB, MA.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bas A. Uijterwijk or Mohammed Abu Hilal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Brescia, Italy (number NP 5269 - STUDIO NPPC 15.03.2022). The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uijterwijk, B.A., Lemmers, D.H., Ghidini, M. et al. The road to tailored adjuvant chemotherapy for all four non-pancreatic periampullary cancers: An international multimethod cohort study. Br J Cancer 131, 117–125 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02692-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02692-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links