Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cellular and Molecular Biology

ENO1 promotes cancer metastasis via stimulating metabolism reprogramming in osteosarcoma

Abstract

Background

This study aims to unravel the underlying mechanisms of osteosarcoma (OS) metastasis by single-cell RNA-sequencing.

Methods

Ten pediatrics OS samples were analyzed using scRNA-seq and divided into three groups: primary tumor without lung metastasis (Pri_non_MT), primary tumor with lung metastasis (Pri_MT), and lung metastasis site (MT). Candidate genes associated with metastasis were identified by bioinformatics analysis and was confirmed at mRNA and protein levels in OS tissues. The function of candidate gene was identified in vitro and in vivo. Bulk RNA sequencing was used to explore downstream mechanism after candidate gene silenced.

Results

A total of 17 cell clusters were identified. ENO1 was selected as the candidate gene and was significantly expressed in Pri_MT and MT groups. In OS tissues, ENO1 significantly overexpressed in patients with lung metastasis compared to those without. Knocking down ENO1 resulted in a marked decrease in migration and invasion in vitro and a reduction in lung metastasis in vivo. Additionally, ENO1 suppression resulted in shifting the primary ATP production pathway from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight ENO1 as a key regulator of glycolysis and metastasis in osteosarcoma, offering a novel therapeutic target for OS treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Construction of single cell atlas of osteosarcoma.
Fig. 2: T cell heterogeneity.
Fig. 3: Myeloid cell heterogeneity.
Fig. 4: NMF gene programs analysis and glucose metabolism score.
Fig. 5: Screening of the candidate genes and its expression in OS tissues.
Fig. 6: Explore the function of ENO1 in vitro.
Fig. 7: Explore the function of ENO1 in vivo.
Fig. 8: Bulk RNA sequencing analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The analyzed data sets generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Corre I, Verrecchia F, Crenn V, Redini F, Trichet V The Osteosarcoma Microenvironment: A Complex But Targetable Ecosystem. Cells. 2020;9:976.

  2. Lindsey BA, Markel JE, Kleinerman ES. Osteosarcoma Overview. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4:25–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed G, Zamzam M, Kamel A, Ahmed S, Salama A, Zaki I, et al. Effect of timing of pulmonary metastasis occurrence on the outcome of metastasectomy in osteosarcoma patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54:775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang C, Tian Y, Zhao F, Chen Z, Su P, Li Y, et al. Bone Microenvironment and Osteosarcoma Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6985.

  5. Cui J, Dean D, Hornicek FJ, Chen Z, Duan Z. The role of extracelluar matrix in osteosarcoma progression and metastasis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Long Z, Sun C, Tang M, Wang Y, Ma J, Yu J, et al. Single-cell multiomics analysis reveals regulatory programs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cell Discov. 2022;8:68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuchina A, Brettner LM, Paleologu L, Roco CM, Rosenberg AB, Carignano A, et al. Microbial single-cell RNA sequencing by split-pool barcoding. Science. 2021;371:eaba5257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. He S, Wang J, Huang Y, Kong F, Yang R, Zhan Y, et al. Intestinal fibrosis in aganglionic segment of Hirschsprung’s disease revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Clin Transl Med. 2023;13:e1193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Yang D, Yang Q, Lv X, Huang W, Zhou Z, et al. Single-cell RNA landscape of intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment in advanced osteosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Huang X, You X, Yi T, Lu B, Liu J, et al. Nanoparticle enhanced combination therapy for stem-like progenitors defined by single-cell transcriptomics in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Feng W, Dai Y, Bao M, Yuan Z, He M, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals the Complexity of the Tumor Microenvironment of Treatment-Naive Osteosarcoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:709210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang X, Wang L, Guo H, Zhang W, Shao Z. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the regulative roles of cancer associated fibroblasts in tumor immune microenvironment of recurrent osteosarcoma. Theranostics. 2022;12:5877–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Tang H, Huang P, Guo J, Shi Y, Yuan C, et al. Single-Cell Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment Heterogeneity in Osteosarcoma Identifies a Highly Invasive Subcluster for Predicting Prognosis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:732862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mereu E, Lafzi A, Moutinho C, Ziegenhain C, McCarthy DJ, Álvarez-Varela A, et al. Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:747–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184:3573–87.e29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolock SL, Lopez R, Klein AM. Scrublet: Computational Identification of Cell Doublets in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. Cell Syst. 2019;8:281–91.e9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, Shalek AK, Gillespie SM, Wakimoto H, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science. 2014;344:1396–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaujoux R, Seoighe C. A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Y, Yang S, Ma J, Chen Z, Song G, Rao D, et al. Spatiotemporal Immune Landscape of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis at Single-Cell Level. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:134–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin H, Gao T, Xie J, Huang Z, Zhang X, Yang F, et al. FUBP1 promotes colorectal cancer stemness and metastasis via DVL1-mediated activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:3490–512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Niini T, Lahti L, Michelacci F, Ninomiya S, Hattinger CM, Guled M, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent alterations of G1/S checkpoint genes in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50:291–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu W, Wang R, Zhang Y, Wang H, Huang Z, Jin T, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in osteosarcoma with distinct prognosis reveals disparate genetic heterogeneity. Cancer Genet. 2021;256-257:149–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sayles LC, Breese MR, Koehne AL, Leung SG, Lee AG, Liu HY, et al. Genome-Informed Targeted Therapy for Osteosarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:46–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Atiye J, Wolf M, Kaur S, Monni O, Böhling T, Kivioja A, et al. Gene amplifications in osteosarcoma-CGH microarray analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;42:158–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chu Y, Dai E, Li Y, Han G, Pei G, Ingram DR, et al. Pan-cancer T cell atlas links a cellular stress response state to immunotherapy resistance. Nat Med. 2023;29:1550–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Engblom C, Pfirschke C, Pittet MJ. The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:447–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21:938–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cui C, Chakraborty K, Tang XA, Zhou G, Schoenfelt KQ, Becker KM, et al. Neutrophil elastase selectively kills cancer cells and attenuates tumorigenesis. Cell. 2021;184:3163–77.e21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang L, Liu Y, Dai Y, Tang X, Yin T, Wang C, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals BHLHE40-driven pro-tumour neutrophils with hyperactivated glycolysis in pancreatic tumour microenvironment. Gut. 2023;72:958–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rahman I, Collado Sánchez A, Davies J, Rzeniewicz K, Abukscem S, Joachim J, et al. L-selectin regulates human neutrophil transendothelial migration. J Cell Sci. 2021;134:jcs250340.

  31. Xue R, Zhang Q, Cao Q, Kong R, Xiang X, Liu H, et al. Liver tumour immune microenvironment subtypes and neutrophil heterogeneity. Nature. 2022;612:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ribatti D. Mast cells as therapeutic target in cancer. Eur J Pharm. 2016;778:152–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marone G, Varricchi G, Loffredo S, Granata F. Mast cells and basophils in inflammatory and tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Eur J Pharm. 2016;778:146–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng S, Li Z, Gao R, Xing B, Gao Y, Yang Y, et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell. 2021;184:792–809.e23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mellman I. Dendritic cells: master regulators of the immune response. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Q, He Y, Luo N, Patel SJ, Han Y, Gao R, et al. Landscape and Dynamics of Single Immune Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell. 2019;179:829–45.e20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Burr ML, Sparbier CE, Chan YC, Williamson JC, Woods K, Beavis PA, et al. CMTM6 maintains the expression of PD-L1 and regulates anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2017;549:101–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jessa S, Blanchet-Cohen A, Krug B, Vladoiu M, Coutelier M, Faury D, et al. Stalled developmental programs at the root of pediatric brain tumors. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1702–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan Q, Yu H, Chen J, Song X, Sun L. Knockdown of pyruvate kinase type M2 suppresses tumor survival and invasion in osteosarcoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. Exp Cell Res. 2018;362:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z, Geng M, Ye X, Ji Y, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. IRF7 inhibits the Warburg effect via transcriptional suppression of PKM2 in osteosarcoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:30–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Feng Z, Ou Y, Hao L. The roles of glycolysis in osteosarcoma. Front Pharm. 2022;13:950886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang J, Li H, Miao L, Ding J. Silencing of ENO1 inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells. J buon. 2020;25:696–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li J, Hu ZQ, Yu SY, Mao L, Zhou ZJ, Wang PC, et al. CircRPN2 Inhibits Aerobic Glycolysis and Metastasis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2022;82:1055–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Li HJ, Ke FY, Lin CC, Lu MY, Kuo YH, Wang YP, et al. ENO1 Promotes Lung Cancer Metastasis via HGFR and WNT Signaling-Driven Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4094–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei ZQ, Ding S, Yang YC. TYROBP-positive endothelial cell-derived TWEAK as a promoter of osteosarcoma progression: insights from single-cell omics. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1200203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang Y, Ning Y, Cheng S, Huang Y, Deng M, Chen C. Single-cell aggrephagy-related patterns facilitate tumor microenvironment intercellular communication, influencing osteosarcoma progression and prognosis. Apoptosis. 2024;29:521–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cheng D, Zhang Z, Mi Z, Tao W, Liu D, Fu J, et al. Deciphering the heterogeneity and immunosuppressive function of regulatory T cells in osteosarcoma using single-cell RNA transcriptome. Comput Biol Med. 2023;165:107417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bian X, Jiang H, Meng Y, Li YP, Fang J, Lu Z. Regulation of gene expression by glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes. Trends Cell Biol. 2022;32:786–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen K, Zhu C, Cai M, Fu D, Cheng B, Cai Z, et al. Integrative metabolome and transcriptome profiling reveals discordant glycolysis process between osteosarcoma and normal osteoblastic cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:1715–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang CK, Sun Y, Lv L, Ping Y. ENO1 and Cancer. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2022;24:288–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Luo M, Wu S, Ma Y, Liang H, Luo Y, Gu W, et al. Evaluating a Panel of Autoantibodies Against Tumor-Associated Antigens in Human Osteosarcoma. Front Genet. 2022;13:872253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nishizawa K, Nishiyama H, Matsui Y, Kobayashi T, Saito R, Kotani H, et al. Thioredoxin-interacting protein suppresses bladder carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kamitori K, Yamaguchi F, Dong Y, Hossain A, Katagi A, Noguchi C, et al. Both Ser361 phosphorylation and the C-arrestin domain of thioredoxin interacting protein are important for cell cycle blockade at the G1/S checkpoint. FEBS Open Bio. 2018;8:1804–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Deng J, Pan T, Liu Z, McCarthy C, Vicencio JM, Cao L, et al. The role of TXNIP in cancer: a fine balance between redox, metabolic, and immunological tumor control. Br J Cancer. 2023;129:1877–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Shen S, Yao T, Xu Y, Zhang D, Fan S, Ma J. CircECE1 activates energy metabolism in osteosarcoma by stabilizing c-Myc. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Qiao G, Wu A, Chen X, Tian Y, Lin X. Enolase 1, a Moonlighting Protein, as a Potential Target for Cancer Treatment. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17:3981–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Vaupel P. Metabolic microenvironment of tumor cells: a key factor in malignant progression. Exp Oncol. 2010;32:125–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Reina-Campos M, Moscat J, Diaz-Meco M. Metabolism shapes the tumor microenvironment. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017;48:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Paul S, Ghosh S, Kumar S. Tumor glycolysis, an essential sweet tooth of tumor cells. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86:1216–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Medical Research Data Center of Fudan University.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project approval No. 82272441). Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (CN). Grant No. 22Y11912200.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

PH and SWH participated in the design of the study and performed the data analysis, PH, ZQ and YN carried out the in vitro and vivo studies. JFW participated in the data analysis. ZCL and YYM performed part of the experiments. RD, GC and BN conceived of the study, provided the funding, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui Dong, Gong Chen or Bo Ning.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by Children’s Hospital of Fudan University (2022-202). All experiments were performed incompliance with the relevant regulations, and all patients provided written informed consent. Besides, the animal studies were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University (00036). The experiments followed the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the Chinese Council on Animal Research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, P., He, S., Qi, Z. et al. ENO1 promotes cancer metastasis via stimulating metabolism reprogramming in osteosarcoma. Br J Cancer 133, 1625–1639 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03182-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03182-3

Search

Quick links