Fig. 5: Clinical utility and concordance of different genomic techniques.

a Proportion of patients with genetic alterations detected by each technique, categorised by clinical relevance. b Concordance analysis between techniques for different types of genetic alterations. c Number of genetic entities identified by each technique in the entire cohort (n = 60). d Number of genetic entities identified by each technique in the subset of 20 patients with available RNAseq data. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.01, **p < 0.001).