Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Epidemiology

Interest of a sequential multimodal approach for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multimetastatic Ewing sarcoma: results of the French prospective CombinaiR3 phase II trial

Abstract

Background

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare tumour with metastatic spread in ~25% of cases at diagnosis. Extrapulmonary disseminated disease defines very high-risk (VHR) patients, with frequent relapse and poor overall survival (OS, ~30%).

Methods

The phase II CombinaiR3 trial (NCT03011528) enroled 45 VHR ES patients across 15 French centres (2017–2021) to evaluate a strategy combining dose-dense induction chemotherapy, high-dose consolidation, and prolonged maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was median event-free survival (EFS). Exploratory endpoints included full-body-fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) detection during treatment.

Results

Among 42 analysed patients (median age 14 years, range 6–47), 29 had a primary tumour volume ≥200 ml, and 35 presented with bone ± bone marrow metastatic lesions, 18 exhibiting more than 5 bone lesions. At 48-month follow-up, 18- and 36-month EFS rates were 63.4% and 53.7%, respectively, with 3-year OS at 65.5%. Toxicity was as expected, with no treatment-related deaths or maintenance therapy discontinuations due to toxicity. PET/CT and ctDNA monitoring showed strong correlation at diagnosis and relapse.

Discussion

This study supports the proposed experimental strategy as a first-line option for selected VHR ES patients, warranting integration into international therapeutic discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Study design and treatment schema for the CombinaiR3 trial.
Fig. 2: Patient treatment flow and attrition throughout the study phases.
Fig. 3: Survival of CombinaiR3 patients.
Fig. 4: Concordance between ctDNA and PET/CT during treatment and follow-up.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated and analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kovar H, Dworzak M, Strehl S, Schnell E, Ambros IM, Ambros PF, et al. Overexpression of the pseudoautosomal gene MIC2 in Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Oncogene. 1990;5:1067–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delattre O, Zucman J, Plougastel B, Desmaze C, Melot T, Peter M, et al. Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding domain caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours. Nature. 1992;359:162–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delattre O, Zucman J, Melot T, Garau XS, Zucker JM, Lenoir GM, et al. The Ewing family of tumors–a subgroup of small-round-cell tumors defined by specific chimeric transcripts. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:294–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zoubek A, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Delattre O, Christiansen H, Niggli F, Gatterer-Menz I, et al. Does expression of different EWS chimeric transcripts define clinically distinct risk groups of Ewing tumor patients? J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riggi N, Suvà ML, Stamenkovic I. Ewing’s Sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:154–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ladenstein R, Pötschger U, Le Deley MC, Whelan J, Paulussen M, Oberlin O, et al. Primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcoma: results of the Euro-EWING 99 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D, Tomazou EM, De Álava E, Kovar H, et al. Ewing sarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;4:5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Womer RB, West DC, Krailo MD, Dickman PS, Pawel BR, Grier HE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Whelan J, Khan A, Sharma A, Rothermundt C, Dileo P, Michelagnoli M, et al. Interval compressed vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide in patients with advanced Ewing’s and other Small Round Cell Sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012;2:12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan B, Kirton L, Marec-Bérard P, Gaspar N, Laurence V, Martín-Broto J, et al. Comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma (EE2012): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1513–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner LM, McAllister N, Goldsby RE, Rausen AR, McNall-Knapp RY, McCarville MB, et al. Temozolomide and intravenous irinotecan for treatment of advanced Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Casey DA, Wexler LH, Merchant MS, Chou AJ, Merola PR, Price AP, et al. Irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:1029–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch R, Gelderblom H, Haveman L, Brichard B, Jürgens H, Cyprova S, et al. High-dose treosulfan and melphalan as consolidation therapy versus standard therapy for high-risk (Metastatic) Ewing sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:2307–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanahan D, Bergers G, Bergsland E. Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Investig. 2000;105:1045–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature. 2005;438:967–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zapletalova D, André N, Deak L, Kyr M, Bajciova V, Mudry P, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy with the COMBAT regimen in advanced pediatric malignancies: a multicenter experience. Oncology. 2012;82:249–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasquier E, Kavallaris M, André N. Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:455–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Casanova M, Ferrari A, Spreafico F, Terenziani M, Massimino M, Luksch R, et al. Vinorelbine in previously treated advanced childhood sarcomas: evidence of activity in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer. 2002;94:3263–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Casanova M, Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Merks JHM, De Salvo GL, Meazza C, et al. Vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide in the treatment of pediatric sarcomas: pilot study for the upcoming European Rhabdomyosarcoma Protocol. Cancer. 2004;101:1664–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bisogno G, Chisholm J, Hladun R, De Salvo GL, Guerin F, Casanova M, et al. Maintenance chemotherapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: long-term survival analysis of the European paediatric soft tissue sarcoma Study Group RMS 2005 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43:1856–62.

  21. Krumbholz M, Hellberg J, Steif B, Bäuerle T, Gillmann C, Fritscher T, et al. Genomic EWSR1 fusion sequence as highly sensitive and dynamic plasma tumor marker in Ewing sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4356–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krumbholz M, Eiblwieser J, Ranft A, Zierk J, Schmidkonz C, Stütz AM, et al. Quantification of translocation-specific ctDNA provides an integrating parameter for early assessment of treatment response and risk stratification in Ewing sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:5922–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shulman DS, Klega K, Imamovic-Tuco A, Clapp A, Nag A, Thorner AR, et al. Detection of circulating tumour DNA is associated with inferior outcomes in Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:615–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta A, Riedel RF, Shah C, Borinstein SC, Isakoff MS, Chugh R, et al. Consensus recommendations in the management of Ewing sarcoma from the National Ewing Sarcoma Tumor Board. Cancer. 2023;129:3363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss SJ, Frezza AM, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, Biagini R, et al. Bone sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS-ERN PaedCan Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1520–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seddon BM, Cassoni AM, Galloway MJ, Rees JH, Whelan JS. Fatal radiation myelopathy after high-dose busulfan and melphalan chemotherapy and radiotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma: a review of the literature and implications for practice. Clin Oncol. 2005;17:385–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bölling T, Dirksen U, Ranft A, Ernst I, Jürgens H, Willich N. Radiation toxicity following busulfan/melphalan high-dose chemotherapy in the EURO-EWING-99-trial: review of GPOH data. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009;185(Suppl 2):21–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carrie C, Le Deley M, Claude L, Alapetite C, Marandet J, Habrand J, et al. The radiosensitization effect and toxicity of busulfan containing chemotherapy before radiotherapy for Ewing’s sarcomas. SPRINGER HEIDELBERG TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, 2009, pp 31–31.

  29. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwak M, Jung S-H. Phase II clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints: optimal two-stage designs with one-sample log-rank test. Stat Med. 2014;33:2004–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choderlos de Laclos X, Risbourg S, Brennan B, Bertucci F, Gaspar N, Gelderblom H, et al. Impact of age on safety of Busulfan-Melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus standard chemotherapy in the patients of the EURO-E.W.I.N.G. 99 and Ewing 2008 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2024;208:114229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brahmi M, Gautier J, Dufresne A, Marec-Berard P, Cropet C, Vizoso S, et al. REGOMAIN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter, comparative phase II study of the efficacy of regorafenib as maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with high-grade bone sarcomas (HGBS) at diagnosis or relapse and without complete remission after standard treatment. JCO. 2022;40:TPS11585–TPS11585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidkonz C, Krumbholz M, Atzinger A, Cordes M, Goetz TI, Prante O, et al. Assessment of treatment responses in children and adolescents with Ewing sarcoma with metabolic tumor parameters derived from 18F-FDG-PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1564–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guinot A, Tabone-Eglinger S, Isnardi V, Bahri H, Surdez D, Delattre O, et al. Staging of newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma: results of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy versus (18)FDG-PET/CT imaging for bone marrow involvement. Eur J Cancer. 2023;179:56–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yadgarov M, Berikashvili L, Rakova E, Likar Y. 18 F-FDG PET metabolic parameters for the prediction of histological response to induction chemotherapy in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2024;49:e640–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Erika Vacchelli for her assistance in writing, editing, and critically reviewing the manuscript. We also acknowledge Lisa Belin for her methodologic help.

Funding

This work was supported by the French Society for Childhood Cancer (SFCE, Société Française des Cancers de l’Enfant) and the ‘Princesse Margot’ Association. The authors also thank Mr. Wisnia for his private donation. We would like to acknowledge La Ligue Contre le Cancer for supporting the project through the 2017 ‘Enfants, Adolescents et Cancer’ grant titled: Étude de l’ADN tumoral circulant, des cellules tumorales circulantes, de la biologie des tumeurs primaires et métastatiques dans les sarcomes d’Ewing à la rechute ou de mauvais pronostic (compilation des études ancillaires EuroEwing 2012, rEECur et CombinaiR3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Valérie Laurence: Conceptualisation, methodology, investigation, writing-original draft, writing-reviewing and editing, funding acquisition. Nina Jehanno: Methodology, investigation, writing-original draft, writing—reviewing and editing. Sylvain Dureau: Methodology, Statistical analysis, writing-original draft, writing—reviewing and editing. Lieke Mous: Methodology, investigation, writing-original draft, writing—reviewing and editing. Line Claude Conceptualisation, writing-original draft, writing-reviewing and editing. Stelly Ballet: Methodology, investigation, writing-original draft, writing—reviewing and editing. Gaëlle Pierron: Resources, writing—review and editing. Nathalie Gaspar: Resources, writing-review and editing. Mehdi Brahmi: Resources, writing—review and editing. Thibaud Valentin: Resources, writing—review and editing. Gabriel Revon Riviere: Resources, writing—review and editing. Cyril Lervat: Resources, writing—review and editing. Jamie Probert: Resources, writing—review and editing. Natacha Entz-Werle: Resources, writing—review and editing. Ludovic Mansuy: Resources, writing-review and editing. Dominique Plantaz: Resources, writing—review and editing. Maria Rios: Resources, writing—review and editing. Laure Saumet: Resources, writing—review and editing. Cécile Vérité: Resources, writing—review and editing. Marie-Pierre Castex: Resources, writing-review and editing. Estelle Thebaud: Resources, writing—review and editing. Thibaut Cassou-Mounat: Resources, writing—review and editing. Anne-Sophie Plissonnier: Project administration. Jennifer Dieppedale: Resources and data monitoring. Olivier Delattre: Resources, writing—review and editing. Marie-Emmanuelle Legrier: Resources and data monitoring. Perrine Marec-Bérard: Resources, writing—review and editing. François Gouin: Resources, writing—review and editing. Pablo Berlanga: Resources, writing—review and editing. Camille Cordero: Resources, writing-review and editing. Didier Surdez: Conceptualisation, resources, writing—reviewing and editing. Nadège Corradini: Conceptualisation, methodology, investigation, writing-original draft, writing—reviewing and editing, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadège Corradini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

PB has consulting role (institutional funding) for Recordati and Merck, drugs for trials from Bayer, participation in educational activities organised by Recordati and is Member of the Executive Committee of the SIOPEN (European neuroblastoma research cooperative group), organisation which receives royalties for the sales of dinutuximab beta.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurence, V., Jehanno, N., Dureau, S. et al. Interest of a sequential multimodal approach for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multimetastatic Ewing sarcoma: results of the French prospective CombinaiR3 phase II trial. Br J Cancer 134, 279–288 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03263-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03263-3

Search

Quick links