Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: improving patient selection for minimally invasive lobectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy based on clinical characteristics

Abstract

Background

We aimed to identify patient and tumour characteristics associated with differential benefit from minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (TNM7), treated with MIL or SABR in 2014-2016, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score (PS) weighting was used to create a virtual SABR cohort with characteristics comparable to the MIL group. We assessed interactions between treatment type and clinical characteristics affecting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

1211 MIL and 972 SABR patients were included. After PS weighting, the impact of treatment type on OS differed significantly between patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82; favouring MIL) versus patients without (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.67) (p = 0.02). Moreover, MIL yielded superior OS in patients with both FEV1 and DLCO ≥ 80% (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.30-1.26), while SABR favoured patients with FEV1 and/or DLCO < 80% (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.95-2.36) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Interactions of treatment type with lung function and with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure impacted OS for patients with stage I NSCLC. These findings warrant validation in other studies to further refine treatment decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Deidentified data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, depending on institutional review and national privacy regulations.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Cancer Observatory. Cancer Today. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en. Last accessed: 4 Nov 2024.

  2. Ward B, Koziar Vašáková M, Robalo Cordeiro C, Yorgancioğlu A, Chorostowska-Wynimko J, Blum TG, et al. Important steps towards a big change for lung health: a joint approach by the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Radiology and their partners to facilitate implementation of the European Union’s new recommendations on lung cancer screening. ERJ Open Res. 2023, 9.

  3. Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, Senan S, Waller DA, Vansteenkiste J, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:iv1–iv21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider BJ, Daly ME, Kennedy EB, Antonoff MB, Broderick S, Feldman J, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:710–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. NCCN Guidelines® insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 2.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21:340–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palma D, Visser O, Lagerwaard FJ, Belderbos J, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Impact of introducing stereotactic lung radiotherapy for elderly patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based time-trend analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Ruiter JC, Heineman DJ, Daniels JM, van Diessen JN, Damhuis RA, Hartemink KJ. The role of surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians in the era of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the Netherlands. Lung Cancer. 2020;144:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, Mehran RJ, Louie AV, Balter P, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:630–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernando HC, Timmerman R. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4099/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1021: a randomized study of sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:S35–S38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Franks KN, McParland L, Webster J, Baldwin DR, Sebag-Montefiore D, Evison M, et al. SABRTooth: a randomised controlled feasibility study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection. Eur Respir J. 2020;56.

  11. Ijsseldijk MA, Shoni M, Siegert C, Wiering B, van Engelenburg AKC, Tsai TC, et al. Oncologic outcomes of surgery versus SBRT for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2021;22:e235–e292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen H, Laba JM, Boldt RG, Goodman CD, Palma DA, Senan S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy versus surgery in early lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen SW, Han L, Lv HL, Xu YZ, Li ZH, Wang MB, et al. A Propensity-matched analysis of outcomes of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated surgically or with stereotactic radiotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2019;32:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Ruiter JC, van der Noort V, van Diessen JNA, Smit EF, Damhuis RAM, Hartemink KJ, et al. The optimal treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: minimally invasive lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy - a nationwide cohort study. Lung Cancer. 2024;191:107792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Sobin LH, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:694–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C, Papiez L, Tudor K, DeLuca J, et al. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4833–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004;23:2937–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brookhart MA, Wyss R, Layton JB, Stürmer T. Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental research. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:604–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19:716–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takenaka T, Katsura M, Shikada Y, Tsukamoto S, Takeo S. The impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the outcome of surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra PK, Pandey R, Shackcloth MJ, McShane J, Grayson AD, Carr MH, et al. Cardiac comorbidity is not a risk factor for mortality and morbidity following surgery for primary non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:439–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benker M, Citak N, Neuer T, Opitz I, Inci I. Impact of preoperative comorbidities on postoperative complication rate and outcome in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;70:248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Craddock M, Nestle U, Koenig J, Schimek-Jasch T, Kremp S, Lenz S, et al. Cardiac function modifies the impact of heart base dose on survival: a voxel-wise analysis of patients with lung cancer from the PET-Plan Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2023;18:57–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McWilliam A, Abravan A, Banfill K, Faivre-Finn C, van Herk M. Demystifying the results of RTOG 0617: identification of dose sensitive cardiac subregions associated with overall survival. J Thorac Oncol. 2023;18:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Banfill K, Giuliani M, Aznar M, Franks K, McWilliam A, Schmitt M, et al. Cardiac toxicity of thoracic radiotherapy: existing evidence and future directions. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:216–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brunelli A, Kim AW, Berger KI, Addrizzo-Harris DJ. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e166S–e190S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rothwell PM. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365:176–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winckelmans T, Decaluwé H, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D. Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57:1051–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by KWF Dutch Cancer Society [grant number 12928].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Julianne de Ruiter: Conceptualisation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing. Vincent van der Noort: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualisation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing —Review and Editing. Judi van Diessen: Investigation, Methodology, Writing - Review and Editing. Egbert Smit: Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing. Ronald Damhuis: Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing. Koen Hartemink: Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing. ESLUNG group: Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koen Johan Hartemink.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

EFS reports grants from AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Roche Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Taiho and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the participating centres. Data were collected anonymously and informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Ruiter, J.C., van der Noort, V., van Diessen, J.N.A. et al. Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: improving patient selection for minimally invasive lobectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy based on clinical characteristics. Br J Cancer (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03332-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03332-7

Search

Quick links