Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Molecular Diagnostics

Gut microbiota-associated predictors as biomarkers of neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer-a systematic review

Abstract

Background

The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as a modulator of cancer therapy outcomes and a potential predictive biomarker. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on microbial biomarkers associated with neoadjuvant treatment (NT) response in rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Ovid Medline databases were searched through March 2025. Eligible studies included RC patients treated with NT with baseline microbial analysis stratified by treatment response. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment (NIH and STORMS tools). Due to substantial heterogeneity, a structured qualitative synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted following SWiM guidelines, using a direction-of-effect vote-counting approach.

Results

Sixteen observational studies (842 patients) were included, covering chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), total neoadjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and immunochemoradiotherapy. Microbiota composition was investigated by 16S rRNA sequencing, metagenomics, or metatranscriptomics on fecal or tissue samples. While microbial diversity showed inconsistent associations, specific taxa -notably Bacteroides, Fusobacterium and Akkermansia- emerged as recurrent biomarkers of poor response to nCRT. Twelve predictive models reported AUROC values from 0.73 to 0.97, with limited external validation.

Conclusions

Specific microbial taxa show a consistent association with nCRT resistance across independent cohorts. However, methodological heterogeneity and limited reproducibility warrant standardized prospective validation before clinical implementation. PROSPERO: CRD42023433704.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: PRISMA diagram.
Fig. 2: Model discrimination.
Fig. 3: Microbial biomarkers associated with response to nCRT in rectal cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used for this systematic review were extracted from articles that were all public and available from PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE.

References

  1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Adam M, Chang G, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 3.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024;22:366–75. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.0041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Gijn W, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM-K, Putter H, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:575–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70097-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keller DS, Berho M, Perez RO, Wexner SD, Chand M. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:414–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rödel C, Hofheinz R, Fokas E. Rectal cancer: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:629–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2016.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Sluis FJ, Couwenberg AM, de Bock GH, Intven MPW, Reerink O, van Leeuwen BL, et al. Population-based study of morbidity risk associated with pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2020;107:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pucciarelli S, Del Bianco P, Efficace F, Serpentini S, Capirci C, De Paoli A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2011;253:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcb856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander JL, Wilson ID, Teare J, Marchesi JR, Nicholson JK, Kinross JM. Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:356–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng WY, Wu C-Y, Yu J. The role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment: friend or foe? Gut. 2020;69:1867–76. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong CC, Yu J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:429–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-023-00766-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chrysostomou D, Roberts LA, Marchesi JR, Kinross JM. Gut microbiota modulation of efficacy and toxicity of cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.10.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao R, Coker OO, Wu J, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Nakatsu G, et al. Aspirin reduces colorectal tumor development in mice and gut microbes reduce its bioavailability and chemopreventive effects. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:969–983.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hou X-Y, Zhang P, Du H-Z, Gao Y-Q, Sun R-Q, Qin S-Y, et al. Prevotella contributes to individual response of FOLFOX in colon cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11:e512. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang S, Yang Y, Weng W, Guo B, Cai G, Ma Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil by upregulation of BIRC3 expression in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0985-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to colorectal cancer by modulating autophagy. Cell. 2017;170:548–563.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng D-W, Dong X, Pan P, Chen K-W, Fan J-X, Cheng S-X, et al. Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:717–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0423-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberti MP, Yonekura S, Duong CPM, Picard M, Ferrere G, Tidjani Alou M, et al. Chemotherapy-induced ileal crypt apoptosis and the ileal microbiome shape immunosurveillance and prognosis of proximal colon cancer. Nat Med. 2020;26:919–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0882-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science. 2013;342:967–70. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. McQuade JL, Daniel CR, Helmink BA, Wargo JA. Modulating the microbiome to improve therapeutic response in cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:e77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30952-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tonneau M, Elkrief A, Pasquier D, Paz Del Socorro T, Chamaillard M, Bahig H, et al. The role of the gut microbiome on radiation therapy efficacy and gastrointestinal complications: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2021;156:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Liu C, Yue J. Radiotherapy and the gut microbiome: facts and fiction. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01735-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mima K, Nishihara R, Qian ZR, Cao Y, Sukawa Y, Nowak JA, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinoma tissue and patient prognosis. Gut. 2016;65:1973–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakatsu G, Zhou H, Wu WKK, Wong SH, Coker OO, Dai Z, et al. Alterations in enteric virome are associated with colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:529–541.e5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Saxena D. The tumor mycobiome: a paradigm shift in cancer pathogenesis. Cell. 2022;185:3648–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zitvogel L, Derosa L, Routy B, Loibl S, Heinzerling L, de Vries IJM, et al. Impact of the ONCOBIOME network in cancer microbiome research. Nat Med. 2025;31:1085–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03608-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schupack DA, Mars RAT, Voelker DH, Abeykoon JP, Kashyap PC. The promise of the gut microbiome as part of individualized treatment strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-021-00499-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirzayi C, Renson A, Genomic Standards Consortium, Massive Analysis and Quality Control Society, Zohra F, Elsafoury S, Geistlinger L, Kasselman LJ, et al. Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist. Nat Med. 2021;27:1885–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01552-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jang B-S, Chang JH, Chie EK, Kim K, Park JW, Kim MJ, et al. Gut microbiome composition is associated with a pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107:736–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi W, Shen L, Zou W, Wang J, Yang J, Wang Y, et al. The gut microbiome is associated with therapeutic responses and toxicities of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients-a pilot study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:562463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.562463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li J, Li J, Lyu N, Ma Y, Liu F, Feng Y, et al. Composition of fecal microbiota in low-set rectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOX. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020;11:2040622320904293. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622320904293

  31. Yi Y, Shen L, Shi W, Xia F, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Gut microbiome components predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:1329–40. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Takenaka IKTM, Bartelli TF, Defelicibus A, Sendoya JM, Golubicki M, Robbio J, et al. Exome and tissue-associated microbiota as predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:809441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.809441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Teng H, Wang Y, Sui X, Fan J, Li S, Lei X, et al. Gut microbiota-mediated nucleotide synthesis attenuates the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:124–138.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2022.11.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun L, Qu J, Ke X, Zhang Y, Xu H, Lv N, et al. Interaction between intratumoral microbiota and tumor mediates the response of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1229888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1229888.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang X, Chen C, Xie W, Zhou C, Tian X, Zhang Z, et al. Metagenomic analysis of intratumoral microbiome linking to response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;S0360-3016(23)07591-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2515

  36. White MG, Damania A, Alshenaifi J, Sahasrabhojane P, Peacock O, Losh J, et al. Young-onset rectal cancer: unique tumoral microbiome and correlation with response to neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg. 2023;278:538–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Y, Zhang X, Jin C, Yue K, Sheng D, Zhang T, et al. Prospective, longitudinal analysis of the gut microbiome in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer predicts response to neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. J Transl Med. 2023;21:221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04054-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sulit AK, Wilson K, Pearson J, Silander OK, Sampurno S, Michael M, et al. Human gene and microbial analyses in rectal cancer complete responses to radiotherapy. BJS Open. 2023;7:zrad035. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad035.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou H, Wang L, Lin Z, Jiang C, Chen X, Wang K, et al. Methylglyoxal from gut microbes boosts radiosensitivity and radioimmunotherapy in rectal cancer by triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress and cGAS-STING activation. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11:e007840 https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hein DM, Coughlin LA, Poulides N, Koh AY, Sanford NN. Assessment of distinct gut microbiome signatures in a diverse cohort of patients undergoing definitive treatment for rectal cancer. J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2024;7:150–8. https://doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-23-30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang Z, Ma J, Han J, Li A, Liu G, Sun Y, et al. Gut microbiome model predicts response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Med. 2024;5:1293–1306.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roesel R, Strati F, Basso C, Epistolio S, Spina P, Djordjevic J, et al. Combined tumor-associated microbiome and immune gene expression profiling predict response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2025;14:2465015. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2025.2465015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee HI, Jang B-S, Chang JH, Kim E, Lee TH, Park JH, et al. Relationships between the microbiome and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2024. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.521

  44. Kokaine L, Gardovskis A, Gardovskis J. Evaluation and predictive factors of complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Medicina. 2021;57:1044 https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Roy S, Trinchieri G. Microbiota: a key orchestrator of cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:271–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Galeano Niño JL, Wu H, LaCourse KD, Kempchinsky AG, Baryiames A, Barber B, et al. Effect of the intratumoral microbiota on spatial and cellular heterogeneity in cancer. Nature. 2022;611:810–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05435-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hurst R, Brewer DS, Gihawi A, Wain J, Cooper CS. Cancer invasion and anaerobic bacteria: new insights into mechanisms. J Med Microbiol. 2024;73:001817 https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Li B, Wei Z, Wang Z, Xu F, Yang J, Lin B, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces oxaliplatin resistance by inhibiting ferroptosis through E-cadherin/β-catenin/GPX4 axis in colorectal cancer. Free Radic Biol Med. 2024;220:125–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.04.226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fan L, Xu C, Ge Q, Lin Y, Wong CC, Qi Y, et al. A. Muciniphila suppresses colorectal tumorigenesis by inducing TLR2/NLRP3-mediated M1-Like TAMs. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021;9:1111–24. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-1019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Derosa L, Routy B, Thomas AM, Iebba V, Zalcman G, Friard S, et al. Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Nat Med. 2022;28:315–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01655-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen S, Fan L, Lin Y, Qi Y, Xu C, Ge Q, et al. Bifidobacterium adolescentis orchestrates CD143+ cancer-associated fibroblasts to suppress colorectal tumorigenesis by Wnt signaling-regulated GAS1. Cancer Commun. 2023;43:1027–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Procaccianti G, Roggiani S, Conti G, Brigidi P, Turroni S, D’Amico F. Bifidobacterium in anticancer immunochemotherapy: friend or foe? Microbiome Res Rep. 2023;2:24 https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2023.23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li J, Chu R, Wang C, Li Y, Wu B, Wan J. Microbiome characteristics and Bifidobacterium longum in colorectal cancer patients pre- and post-chemotherapy. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9:2178–90. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.03.33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang R, Liu W, Cai S, Feng X, Chen Y, Cheng X, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of probiotics in the chemoradiotherapy of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25:312 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03914-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ugai S, Liu LI, Kosumi K, Kawamura H, Hamada T, Mima,K, et al. Long-term yogurt intake and colorectal cancer incidence subclassified by Bifidobacterium abundance in tumor. Gut Microbes. 2025;17:2452237. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2025.2452237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Little MS, Ervin SM, Walton WG, Tripathy A, Xu Y, Liu J, et al. Active site flexibility revealed in crystal structures of Parabacteroides merdae β-glucuronidase from the human gut microbiome. Protein Sci. 2018;27:2010–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wallace BD, Wang H, Lane KT, Scott JE, Orans J, Koo JS, et al. Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme. Science. 2010;330:831–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Huo R-X, Wang Y-J, Hou S-B, Wang W, Zhang C-Z, Wan X-H. Gut mucosal microbiota profiles linked to colorectal cancer recurrence. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1946–64. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Weir TL, Manter DK, Sheflin AM, Barnett BA, Heuberger AL, Ryan EP. Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70803 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tito RY, Verbandt S, Aguirre Vazquez M, Lahti L, Verspecht C, Lloréns-Rico V, et al. Microbiome confounders and quantitative profiling challenge predicted microbial targets in colorectal cancer development. Nat Med. 2024;30:1339–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02963-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. d’Humières C, Delavy M, Alla L, Ichou F, Gauliard E, Ghozlane A, et al. Perturbation and resilience of the gut microbiome up to 3 months after β-lactams exposure in healthy volunteers suggest an important role of microbial β-lactamases. Microbiome. 2024;12:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01746-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Lam SY, Ioannou A, Konstanti P, Visseren T, Doukas M, Peppelenbosch MP, et al. Technical challenges regarding the use of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens for the detection of bacterial alterations in colorectal cancer. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:297 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02359-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Enderlin D, Bieri U, Gadient J, Morsy Y, Scharl M, Rüschoff JH, et al. Towards reliable methodology: microbiome analysis of fresh frozen vs. formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bladder tissue samples: a feasibility study. Microorganisms. 2024;12:2594 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mukhopadhya I, Martin JC, Shaw S, McKinley AJ, Gratz SW, Scott KP. Comparison of microbial signatures between paired faecal and rectal biopsy samples from healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing and culturomics. Microbiome. 2022;10:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01354-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Sinha R, Abu-Ali G, Vogtmann E, Fodor AA, Ren B, Amir A, et al. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:1077–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Warmbrunn MV, Attaye I, Herrema H, Nieuwdorp M. Protocol standardization of microbiome studies—daunting but necessary. Gastroenterology. 2022;162:1822–4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Allaband C, Lingaraju A, Flores Ramos S, Kumar T, Javaheri H, Tiu MD, et al. Time of sample collection is critical for the replicability of microbiome analyses. Nat Metab. 2024;6:1282–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01064-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Huttenhower C, Finn RD, McHardy AC. Challenges and opportunities in sharing microbiome data and analyses. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8:1960–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01484-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Isali I, Wong TR, Tian S. Best practice guidelines for collecting microbiome samples in research studies. Eur Urol Focus. 2024;10:909–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu G, Xu T, Zhao N, Lam YY, Ding X, Wei D, et al. A core microbiome signature as an indicator of health. Cell. 2024;187:6550–6565.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhou X, Shen X, Johnson JS, Spakowicz DJ, Agnello M, Zhou W, et al. Longitudinal profiling of the microbiome at four body sites reveals core stability and individualized dynamics during health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:506–526.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2024.02.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by AIRC under Grant IG 2019 - ID. 23381 – P.I. Scarpa Marco.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

AS: data curation, investigation, visualization, writing-review and editing; AK, AR, IC: writing-review and editing; MS: funding acquisition, supervision, writing-review and editing; MeS: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marco Scarpa or Melania Scarpa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stepanyan, A., Kotsafti, A., Rosato, A. et al. Gut microbiota-associated predictors as biomarkers of neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer-a systematic review. Br J Cancer (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03443-9

Search

Quick links