Fig. 4: Transcriptome analyses from parental mMSC lines and iPSC-derived iMSC lines. | Cell Death & Disease

Fig. 4: Transcriptome analyses from parental mMSC lines and iPSC-derived iMSC lines.

From: Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation

Fig. 4

a Differentially expressed genes in iMSC12. b Overlap between two comparisons (iMSC12 ARG vs. nMSC12 and iMSC12 TEX vs. nMSC12) shown as Venn diagrams. c Unsupervised clustering (Euclidian distance) of samples from donor 12 (nMSC12, iMSC12 ARG, and iMSC12 TEX). d Distribution variance and mean values for lines originated from donor 12. e Differentially expressed genes in iMSC13. f Overlap between two comparisons (iMSC13 ARG vs. nMSC13 and iMSC13 TEX vs. nMSC13) shown as Venn diagrams. g Unsupervised clustering (Euclidian distance) of samples from donor 13 (nMSC13, iMSC13 ARG, and iMSC13 TEX). h Distribution variance and mean values for lines originated from donor 13

Back to article page