Table 1 Statistics for the results.
Fig. 1 | Time point | Sample size | Test | P value | t, df, or F (Dfn, Dfd) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Total-caspase8 | 24 h | n = 6–7 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.363 | t = 0.9487, df = 11 |
43kd cleaved-caspase8 | 24 h | n = 6–7 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.002 | t = 4.172, df = 11 | |
18kd cleaved-caspase 8 | 24 h | n = 6–7 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.000 | t = 5.624, df = 11 | |
C | Caspase 8 activity | 24 h | n = 7–8 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | <0.0001 | t = 6.76, df = 13 |
E | RIPK1 | Sham/3 h/6 h/24 h | One-way anova | 0.9953 | F (3, 16) = 0.02219 | |
Sham vs. 3 h | n = 3–7 | Dunnett test | 0.9979 | |||
Sham vs. 6 h | n = 3–7 | Dunnett test | 0.9987 | |||
Sham vs. 24 h | n = 7 | Dunnett test | 0.9993 | |||
F | RIPK3 | Sham/3 h/6 h/24 h | One-way anova | 0.0121 | F (3, 16) = 5.033 | |
Sham vs. 3 h | n = 3–7 | Dunnett test | 0.0334 | |||
Sham vs. 6 h | n = 3–7 | Dunnett test | 0.0482 | |||
G | Sham vs. 24 h | n = 7 | Dunnett test | 0.0129 | ||
MLKL | Sham/3 h/6 h/24 h | One-way anova | 0.0004 | F (3, 17) = 10.55 | ||
Sham vs. 3 h | n = 4–8 | Dunnett test | 0.0391 | |||
Sham vs. 6 h | n = 3–8 | Dunnett test | 0.2926 | |||
Sham vs. 24 h | n = 6–8 | Dunnett test | 0.0001 | |||
I | RIPK1 expression in CD31 (WT) | 24 h | n = 7 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.027 | t = 2.512 df = 12 |
RIPK1 expression in CD11b | 24 h | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.022 | t = 2.76, df = 9 | |
RIPK1 expression in neuron | 24 h | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.010 | t = 3.28, df = 9 | |
J | RIPK3 expression in CD31 | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.009 | t = 3.224, df = 10 |
RIPK3 expression in CD11b | 24 h | n = 5 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.083 | t = 1.982, df = 8 | |
RIPK3 expression in neuron | 24 h | n = 5 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.370 | t = 0.95, df = 8 | |
K | MLKL epxression in CD31_ | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.924 | t = 0.09827, df = 10 |
MLKL expression in CD11b | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.568 | t = 0.5903, df = 10 | |
MLKL expression in neuron | 24 h | n = 5 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.030 | t = 2.636, df = 8 |
Fig. 2 | Time point | Sample size | Test | P value | t, df/F(DFn,DFd) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | RIPK1 in triton fraction | Sham 3 h 24 h | One-way anova | 0.270 | F (2, 6) = 1.642 | |
Sham vs 3 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.2736 | |||
Sham vs 24 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.2725 | |||
RIPK1 in urea fraction | Sham 3 h 24 h | One-way anova | 0.0071 | F (2, 6) = 12.60 | ||
3 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.2786 | |||
24 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.0048 | |||
C | RIPK3 in trition fraction | Sham 3 h 24 h | n = 3 | One-way anova | 0.0315 | F (2, 6) = 6.503 |
3 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.0874 | |||
24 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.0221 | |||
D | MLKL in triton fraction | Sham 3 h 24 h | n = 3 | One-way anova | 0.1161 | F (2, 6) = 3.149 |
3 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.3572 | |||
24 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.0794 | |||
MLKL in urea fraction | Sham 3 h 24 h | n = 3 | One-way anova | 0.019 | F (2, 6) = 8.244 | |
3 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.187 | |||
24 h | n = 3 | Dunnett test | 0.0119 | |||
F | p-RIPK3 in CD11b | 3 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.011 | t = 4.536, df = 4 |
p-RIPK3 in neuron | 3 h | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | <0.0001 | t = 10.25, df = 6 | |
p-MLKL in neuron | 3 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.041 | t = 2.973, df = 4 | |
H | p-RIPK3 in CD31 | 24 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.011 | t = 4.485, df = 4 |
p-RIPK3 in CD11b | 24 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.044 | t = 2.910, df = 4 | |
p-RIPK3 in neuron | 24 h | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.045 | t = 2.520, df = 6 | |
p-MLKL in neuron | 24 h | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.023 | t = 3.041, df = 6 | |
K | p-RIPK3 3D culture | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.003 | t = 3.828, df = 10 |
RIPK3 3D culture | 24 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.046 | t = 2.852, df = 4 |
Fig. 3 | Comparison | Sample size | Test | Column factor | Time x column factor | Time | Subject | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | RIPK3KO wire grip | n = 19–21 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.019 | F (1, 38) = 6.033 | 0.140 | F (8, 304) = 1.549 | <0.0001 | F (4.535, 172.3) = 85.86 | <0.0001 | F (38, 304) = 2.681 | |
C | RIPK3KO rotarod | Pre WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 9–10 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.545 | t = 0.6177, df = 17 | ||||||
Post WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 9–11 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.017 | F (1, 17) = 6.961 | 0.876 | F (3, 51) = 0.2291 | <0.0001 | F (1.892, 32.16) = 26.30 | 0.279 | F [17, 51] = 1.226 | ||
D | RIPK3KO mwm | Hidden platform | n = 9–12 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.028 | F (1, 19) = 5.667 | 0.279 | F (6, 114) = 1.266 | <0.0001 | F (4.105, 77.99) = 8.564 | <0.0001 | F (19, 114) = 5.452 |
Visible platform | n = 9–10 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.253 | F (1, 17) = 1.399 | 0.000 | F [1, 17] = 20.55 | 0.632 | F [1, 17] = 0.2385 | 0.164 | F [17, 17] = 1.623 | ||
E | RIPK3KO probe test | WT pre vs WT post | n = 9 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.005 | t = 3.220, df = 16 | ||||||
RIPK3−/− pre vs post | n = 12 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.680 | t = 0.4176, df = 22 | ||||||||
F | RIPK3KO NORT | WT pre old vs novel | n = 10 | Paired t test | 0.001 | t = 4.852, df = 9 | ||||||
WT post old vs novel | n = 10 | Paired t test | 0.615 | t = 0.5203, df = 9 | ||||||||
RIPK3KO pre old vs novel | n = 9 | Paired t test | 0.001 | t = 5.464, df = 8 | ||||||||
RIPK3KO post old vs novel | n = 9 | Paired t test | 0.033 | t = 2.565, df = 8 | ||||||||
G | MLKLKO wire grip | Wire grip | n = 14–16 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.314 | F (1, 28) = 1.051 | 0.237 | F (6, 152) = 1.354 | <0.0001 | F (4.133, 104.7) = 32.89 | ||
H | MLKL KO rotarod | WT pre vs MLKL pre | n = 12–13 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.969 | t = 0.03919, df = 23 | ||||||
WT post vs MLKL post | n = 12–13 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.700 | F (1, 23) = 0.1523 | 0.972 | F (3, 69) = 0.07760 | 0.131 | F (1.597, 36.73) = 2.238 | <0.0001 | F [23, 69] = 3.342 | ||
I | MLKLKO MWM | Hidden platform | n = 14–15 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.321 | F (1, 27) = 1.020 | 0.079 | F (6, 162) = 1.931 | <0.0001 | F (3.562, 96.19) = 7.131 | <0.0001 | F (27, 162) = 7.589 |
Visible platform | n = 14–15 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.003 | F (1, 27) = 11.08 | 0.253 | F (1, 27) = 1.366 | 0.573 | F [1, 27] = 0.3257 | 0.144 | F [27, 27] = 1.514 | ||
J | MLKLKO probe test | WT pre vs WT post | n = 14–16 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.001 | t = 3.948, df = 29 | ||||||
MLKL KO pre vs post CCI | n = 14–17 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.049 | t = 2.062, df = 27 | ||||||||
WT post CCI vs MLKL post CCI | n = 14–18 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.408 | t = 0.8410, df = 27 | ||||||||
Fig. 4 | Region | Sample size | Test | p value | t, df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | RIPK3KO vs WT PI | CA1 | n = 8 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.725 | t = 0.3591, df = 14 |
CA3 | n = 8 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.562 | t = 0.5943, df = 14 | ||
DG | n = 8 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.090 | t = 1.820, df = 14 | ||
Cortex | n = 8 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.721 | t = 0.3641, df = 14 | ||
D | FJB + cell in WT vs RIPK3KO | CA1 | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.213 | t = 1.331, df = 10 |
CA3 | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.775 | t = 0.2943, df = 10 | ||
DG | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.187 | t = 1.418, df = 10 | ||
Cortex middle | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.504 | t = 0.6931, df = 10 | ||
Cortex lateral | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.979 | t = 0.02650, df = 10 | ||
F | WT vs RIPK3−/− lesion volume | n = 9–10 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.632 | t = 0.4872, df = 17 | |
H | WT vs MLKL−/− lesion volume | n = 14–16 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.436 | t = 0.7903, df = 28 |
Fig. 5 | Ipsilateral | Contralateral | WT con vs ipsi | KO con vs ipsi | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time point | Sample size | Test | p value | t, df | p value | t, df | p value | p value | ||||
B | RIPK3 vs WT evansblue | 24 h | n = 7 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.044 | t = 2.250, df = 12 | 0.601 | t = 0.5375, df = 12 | 0.022 | 2.522E-07 | 8.856E-05 | |
D | WT vs MLKL/-/ evans blue | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.027 | t = 2.580, df = 10 | 0.260 | t = 1.195, df = 10 | 0.021 | 4.142E-06 | 6.657E-05 | |
E | WT vs RIPK3-/- edema | 24 h | n = 4–5 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.162 | t = 1.565, df = 7 | 0.484 | t = 0.7387, df = 7 | 0.157 | t = 1.583, df = 7 | 6.696E-06 | 1.066E-04 |
F | WT vs MLKL edema | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.095 | t = 1.847, df = 10 | 0.026 | t = 2.613, df = 10 | 0.586 | t = 0.5625, df = 10 | 3.087E-05 | 3.678E-02 |
Fig. 6 | Comparison | Sample size | Test | p value | t, df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | CD11b 48 h | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.529 | t = 0.6678, df = 6 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.016 | t = 2.879, df = 10 | ||
C | Microglia 48 h | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.604 | t = 0.5477, df = 6 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.027 | t = 2.595, df = 10 | ||
D | Macrophage 48 h | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.910 | t = 0.1177, df = 6 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.013 | t = 3.028, df = 10 | ||
E | Neutrophil 48 h | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.529 | t = 0.6675, df = 6 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.221 | t = 1.307, df = 10 | ||
F | Lymphocytes 48 h | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.581 | t = 0.5833, df = 6 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.443 | t = 0.7990, df = 10 | ||
G | IL1b elisa brain tissue | Sham WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.007 | t = 3.451, df = 9 |
CCI WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 6–9 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.002 | t = 3.978, df = 13 | ||
I | CD11b + 3 w | WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.042 | t = 2.376, df = 9 |
J | Microglia 3 w | WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.037 | t = 2.450, df = 9 |
K | Macrophage 3 w | WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.628 | t = 0.5014, df = 9 |
L | Lymphocytes 3 w | WT vs RIPK3KO | n = 5–6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.971 | t = 0.03764, df = 9 |
Fig. 7 | Time point | Sample size | Test | p value | t, df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Neurons | 24 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.011 | t = 4.436, df = 4 |
E | WT | 24 h | n = 5 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.006 | t = 5.409, df = 4 |
RIPK3−/− | 24 h | n = 4 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.448 | t = 0.8714, df = 3 | |
MLKL | 24 h | n = 3 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | <0.0001 | t = 105.7, df = 2 |
Supplement Fig. 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | p-RIPK1 sham vs CCI | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.525 | t = 0.6587,df = 10 |
RIPK1 sham vs CCI | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.368 | t = 0.9419,df = 10 | |
C | p-MLKL sham vs CCI | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.306 | t = 1.079,df = 10 |
MLKL sham vs CCI | 24 h | n = 6 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.586 | t = 0.5626, df = 10 |
Supplement Fig. 3 | Sample size | Test | p value | Time x column factor | t, df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | RIPK3KO vs WT baseline mwm | n = 9–12 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.468 | F (1, 19) = 0.5478 | 0.966 | F (6, 114) = 0.2314 | |
B | MLKLKO vs WT baseline mwm | n = 15–16 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.823 | F (1, 29) = 0.05105 | 0.909 | F (6, 174) = 0.3505 | |
C | RIPK3KO vs WT platform crossing | n = 9–12 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.282 | t = 1.106, df = 19 | |||
D | MLKLKO vs WT platform crossing | n = 15–16 | Unpaired t test, two tailed | 0.820 | t = 0.2296, df = 27 | |||
E | RIPK3KO vs WT post CCI swim speed | n = 9–12 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.207 | F (1, 19) = 1.709 | P = 0.0921 | F (6, 114) = 1.869 | |
F | MLKLKO vs WT post CCI swim speed | n = 14–15 | Two-way RM ANOVA | 0.267 | F (1, 27) = 1.285 | 0.766 | F (6, 162) = 0.5546 |