Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Cell Death & Disease
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. cell death & disease
  3. articles
  4. article
SOX4-STAT6-MTHFD2 axis drives hepatocellular carcinoma progression and treatment resistance
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 January 2026

SOX4-STAT6-MTHFD2 axis drives hepatocellular carcinoma progression and treatment resistance

  • Chia-Lung Tsai  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7895-909X1 na1,
  • Ming-Chin Yu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6980-71232,3 na1,
  • Cheng-Lung Hsu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-30793,4,
  • Hsiang-Yu Tang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-63705,
  • Yun-Shien Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-335X6,
  • Lang-Ming Chi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-22397,
  • Sey-En Lin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8994-94528,
  • Mei-Ling Cheng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2006-133X5,9,
  • Heng-Yuan Hsu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9342-87722,3 &
  • …
  • Chi-Neu Tsai  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-06962,10 

Cell Death & Disease , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2308 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer metabolism
  • Liver cancer

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden. Despite recent advances in immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment or combined therapies, therapeutic resistance and disease progression remain significant challenges. SOX4, a transcription factor frequently overexpressed in HCC and other cancers, has been linked to drug resistance and poor prognosis; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unexplored. In this study, we identify STAT6 as a novel transcriptional target and interacting partner of SOX4 in HCC cells. Genetic ablation or knockdown of SOX4 induced hypermethylation of the STAT6 promoter, suppressing its expression, while treatment with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Aza-2’-deoxycytidine restored STAT6 levels, indicating an epigenetic mechanism of regulation. In addition, SOX4 is physically associated with STAT6, as confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. SOX4 depletion impaired interleukin-4 (IL-4)-induced phosphorylation of STAT6 at tyrosine residue 641 (Y641), implicating SOX4 in IL-4-mediated STAT6 activation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated that SOX4 and STAT6 co-occupy the promoter of MTHFD2, a key enzyme in folate metabolism, regulating NADH/NADPH production and nucleotide biosynthesis. Knockdown of SOX4 or STAT6, or mutation of their binding sites within the MTHFD2 promoter, reduced MTHFD2 expression, NADPH levels, and nucleotide synthesis. Transcriptomic analyses from TCGA-LIHC and our independent cohort revealed a strong positive correlation between SOX4, STAT6, and MTHFD2, with MTHFD2 overexpression linked to poor overall survival. Clinically, elevated SOX4/STAT6/MTHFD2 axis activity was associated with resistance to immunotherapy or TKIs, either in our enrolled cohort or transcriptome data obtained from GSE109211. Metabolomic profiling further revealed increased NADPH and nucleotide biosynthesis in tumors with high SOX4/STAT6/MTHFD2 expression. Targeting STAT6 or MTHFD2 suppressed tumor growth in TKIs-resistant patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, our findings identify the SOX4–STAT6–MTHFD2 axis as a critical driver of HCC progression and therapeutic resistance, offering a promising target for intervention in refractory HCC.

Similar content being viewed by others

NRF2-SOX4 complex regulates PSPH in hepatocellular carcinoma and modulates M2 macrophage differentiation

Article 25 August 2025

Targeting SIX2 as a novel sensitization strategy of sorafenib treatment on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma through modulating METTL9-SLC7A11 axis

Article Open access 16 June 2025

Cellular reprogramming in vivo initiated by SOX4 pioneer factor activity

Article Open access 26 February 2024

Data availability

All supporting data are provided within the main text and supplementary materials. The high-throughput datasets generated in this study—including DNA methylation, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq profiles—have been deposited in the GEO under accession numbers GSE286327, GSE277540, and GSE277728, respectively.

References

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown ZJ, Tsilimigras DI, Ruff SM, Mohseni A, Kamel IR, Cloyd JM, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:410–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu HY, Tang JH, Huang SF, Huang CW, Lin SE, Huang SW, et al. Recurrence pattern is an independent surgical prognostic factor for long-term oncological outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomedicines. 2024;12.

  4. Falette Puisieux M, Pellat A, Assaf A, Ginestet C, Brezault C, Dhooge M, et al. Therapeutic management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated review. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14.

  5. Haber PK, Puigvehi M, Castet F, Lourdusamy V, Montal R, Tabrizian P, et al. Evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2002-2020). Gastroenterology. 2021;161:879–98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moreno CS. SOX4: The unappreciated oncogene. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;67:57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guan Y, Jiang SR, Liu JG, Shi JR, Liu ZB. USP20 regulates the stability of EMT transcription factor SOX4 and influences colorectal cancer metastasis. Pathol Res Pract. 2022;233:153879.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li L, Liu J, Xue H, Li C, Liu Q, Zhou Y, et al. A TGF-beta-MTA1-SOX4-EZH2 signaling axis drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Oncogene. 2020;39:2125–39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Song GD, Sun Y, Shen H, Li W. SOX4 overexpression is a novel biomarker of malignant status and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:4167–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tiwari N, Tiwari VK, Waldmeier L, Balwierz PJ, Arnold P, Pachkov M, et al. Sox4 is a master regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition by controlling Ezh2 expression and epigenetic reprogramming. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:768–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai CN, Yu SC, Lee CW, Pang JS, Wu CH, Lin SE, et al. SOX4 activates CXCL12 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells to modulate endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis in vivo. Oncogene. 2020;39:4695–710.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vervoort SJ, de Jong OG, Roukens MG, Frederiks CL, Vermeulen JF, Lourenco AR, et al. Global transcriptional analysis identifies a novel role for SOX4 in tumor-induced angiogenesis. Elife. 2018;7.

  13. Vervoort SJ, Lourenco AR, Tufegdzic Vidakovic A, Mocholi E, Sandoval JL, Rueda OM, et al. SOX4 can redirect TGF-beta-mediated SMAD3-transcriptional output in a context-dependent manner to promote tumorigenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:9578–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Hao T, Pan Y, Qian X, Zhou D. Increased expression of SOX4 is a biomarker for. malignant status and poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;402:75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Li Y, Yang X, Yuan H, Li X, Qi M, et al. ERG-SOX4 interaction promotes. epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2014;74:647–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang L, Zhang J, Yang X, Chang YW, Qi M, Zhou Z, et al. SOX4 is associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in vitro. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013;16:301–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deng X, Wang Y, Guo H, Wang Q, Rao S, Wu H. Pan-cancer analysis and experimental. validation of sox4 as a potential diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy biomarker. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15.

  18. Wu J, Zhu MX, Li KS, Peng L, Zhang PF. Circular RNA drives resistance to anti-PD-1. immunotherapy by regulating the miR-30a-5p/SOX4 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 2022;5:261–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta GA, Angus SP, Khella CA, Tong K, Khanna P, Dixon SAH, et al. SOX4 and. SMARCA4 cooperatively regulate PI3k signaling through transcriptional activation of TGFBR2. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maier E, Duschl A, Horejs-Hoeck J. STAT6-dependent and -independent mechanisms in Th2 polarization. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:2827–33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karpathiou G, Papoudou-Bai A, Ferrand E, Dumollard JM, Peoc’h M. STAT6: a review of a signaling pathway implicated in various diseases with a special emphasis in its usefulness in pathology. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;223:153477.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goenka S, Kaplan MH. Transcriptional regulation by STAT6. Immunol Res. 2011;50:87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim EG, Shin HJ, Lee CG, Park HY, Kim YK, Park HW, et al. DNA methylation and not allelic variation regulates STAT6 expression in human T cells. Clin Exp Med. 2010;10:143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Park SJ, Kim H, Kim SH, Joe EH, Jou I. Epigenetic downregulation of STAT6 increases. HIF-1alpha expression via mTOR/S6K/S6, leading to enhanced hypoxic viability of glioma cells. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:149.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Binnemars-Postma K, Bansal R, Storm G, Prakash J. Targeting the Stat6 pathway in tumor-associated macrophages reduces tumor growth and metastatic niche formation in breast cancer. FASEB J. 2018;32:969–78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. He K, Barsoumian HB, Puebla-Osorio N, Hu Y, Sezen D, Wasley MD, et al. Inhibition of STAT6 with antisense oligonucleotides enhances the systemic antitumor effects of radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2023;11:486–500.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee YJ, Kim K, Kim M, Ahn YH, Kang JL. Inhibition of STAT6 Activation by AS1517499. Inhibits expression and activity of PPARgamma in macrophages to resolve acute inflammation in mice. Biomolecules. 2022;12.

  28. Chen J, Gong C, Mao H, Li Z, Fang Z, Chen Q, et al. E2F1/SP3/STAT6 axis is required for. IL-4-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2018;53:567–78.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cui X, Zhang L, Luo J, Rajasekaran A, Hazra S, Cacalano N, et al. Unphosphorylated. STAT6 contributes to constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26:4253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fu C, Jiang L, Hao S, Liu Z, Ding S, Zhang W, et al. Activation of the IL-4/STAT6 Signaling Pathway Promotes Lung Cancer Progression by Increasing M2 Myeloid Cells. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2638.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li BH, Yang XZ, Li PD, Yuan Q, Liu XH, Yuan J, et al. IL-4/Stat6 activities correlate with apoptosis and metastasis in colon cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369:554–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shi JH, Liu LN, Song DD, Liu WW, Ling C, Wu FX, et al. TRAF3/STAT6 axis regulates macrophage polarization and tumor progression. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30:2005–16.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang N, Tao L, Zhong H, Zhao S, Yu Y, Yu B, et al. miR-135b inhibits tumour metastasis in prostate cancer by targeting STAT6. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:543–50.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Qing T, Yamin Z, Guijie W, Yan J, Zhongyang S. STAT6 silencing induces hepatocellular carcinoma-derived cell apoptosis and growth inhibition by decreasing the RANKL expression. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;92:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ducker GS, Rabinowitz JD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25:27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shang M, Yang H, Yang R, Chen T, Fu Y, Li Y, et al. The folate cycle enzyme MTHFD2. induces cancer immune evasion through PD-L1 up-regulation. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1940.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bonagas N, Gustafsson NMS, Henriksson M, Marttila P, Gustafsson R, Wiita E, et al. Pharmacological targeting of MTHFD2 suppresses acute myeloid leukemia by inducing thymidine depletion and replication stress. Nat Cancer. 2022;3:156–72.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nishimura T, Nakata A, Chen X, Nishi K, Meguro-Horike M, Sasaki S, et al. Cancer stem-like properties and gefitinib resistance are dependent on purine synthetic metabolism mediated by the mitochondrial enzyme MTHFD2. Oncogene. 2019;38:2464–81.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Yu Z, Jiang Y, Le T, Wu Y, Li Z, et al. Downregulation of MTHFD2 Inhibits. Proliferation and Enhances chemosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma via PI3K/AKT pathway. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed. 2024;29:35.

  40. Mo HY, Wang RB, Ma MY, Zhang Y, Li XY, Wen WR, et al. MTHFD2-mediated redox. homeostasis promotes gastric cancer progression under hypoxic conditions. Redox Rep. 2024;29:2345455.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yue L, Pei Y, Zhong L, Yang H, Wang Y, Zhang W, et al. Mthfd2 modulates mitochondrial. function and dna repair to maintain the pluripotency of mouse stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2020;15:529–45.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kamerkar S, Leng C, Burenkova O, Jang SC, McCoy C, Zhang K, et al. Exosome-mediated. genetic reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages by exoASO-STAT6 leads to potent monotherapy antitumor activity. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabj7002.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Alhawarri MB. Exploring the anticancer potential of furanpydone a: a computational. study on its inhibition of MTHFD2 across diverse cancer cell lines. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2024;83:437–54.

  44. Li G, Wu J, Li L, Jiang P. p53 deficiency induces MTHFD2 transcription to promote cell. proliferation and restrain DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118.

  45. Cagatay T, Ozturk M. P53 mutation as a source of aberrant beta-catenin accumulation in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:7971–80.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li M, Sun D, Song N, Chen X, Zhang X, Zheng W, et al. Mutant p53 in head and neck. squamous cell carcinoma: Molecular mechanism of gain‑of‑function and targeting therapy (Review). Oncol Rep. 2023;50.

  47. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical. strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:330–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kim DW, Talati C, Kim R. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): beyond sorafenib-chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;8:256–65.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Verma H, Narendra G, Raju B, Singh PK, Silakari O. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase-mediated resistance to 5-fluorouracil: mechanistic investigation and solution. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022;5:1017–33.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen JY, Chou HH, Lim SC, Huang YJ, Lai KC, Guo CL, et al. Multiomic characterization. and drug testing establish circulating tumor cells as an ex vivo tool for personalized medicine. iScience. 2022;25:105081.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Broutier L, Mastrogiovanni G, Verstegen MM, Francies HE, Gavarro LM, Bradshaw CR, et al. Human primary liver cancer-derived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening. Nat Med. 2017;23:1424–35.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lin RJ, Kuo MW, Yang BC, Tsai HH, Chen K, Huang JR, et al. B3GALT5 knockout alters gycosphingolipid profile and facilitates transition to human naive pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:27435–44.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lin CY, Wu RC, Huang CY, Lai CH, Chao AS, Li HP, et al. A patient-derived xenograft. model of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a proof-of-concept study for the identification of new molecularly informed treatment approaches. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13.

  54. Tsai CN, Yu MC, Lee YS, Feng KC, Wu CH, Li YC, et al. NRF2-SOX4 complex regulates. PSPH in hepatocellular carcinoma and modulates M2 macrophage differentiation. Cancer Gene Ther. 2025.

  55. Lin CY, Wu KY, Chi LM, Tang YH, Huang HJ, Lai CH, et al. Starvation-inactivated MTOR. triggers cell migration via a ULK1-SH3PXD2A/TKS5-MMP14 pathway in ovarian carcinoma. Autophagy. 2023;19:3151–68.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ianevski A, Giri AK, Aittokallio T. SynergyFinder 2.0: visual analytics of multi-drug combination synergies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W488–93.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li HP, Huang CY, Lui KW, Chao YK, Yeh CN, Lee LY, et al. Combination of epithelial. growth factor receptor blockers and CDK4/6 inhibitor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13.

  58. Ma H, Zhang J, Zhou L, Wen S, Tang HY, Jiang B, et al. c-Src promotes tumorigenesis and. tumor progression by activating PFKFB3. Cell Rep. 2020;30:4235–49 e6.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pang Z, Lu Y, Zhou G, Hui F, Xu L, Viau C, et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified. platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:W398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu Z, Leung GKK. More than a metabolic enzyme: MTHFD2 as a novel target for. anticancer therapy? Front Oncol. 2020;10:658.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors deeply appreciated Dr. Jean-Marc Egly (Directeur de Recherche Inserm, Membre de l’Institut-Academie des Sciences) giving critical comments on this manuscript. The authors are also grateful for the valuable support provided by the Microscopy, Genomic Medicine Core Laboratory, Clinical Proteomics Core Laboratory, and Laboratory Animal Center of Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch. Additionally, they acknowledge the technical assistance of the Metabolomics Core Laboratory of the Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang-Gung University, Taiwan. Special thanks to Miss Yi-Ping Liu for her assistance with data retrieval and processing, as well as to the colleagues from the Research Specimen Processing Laboratory and the New Taipei Municipal Tu-Cheng Hospital for their support. Authors would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com.tw) for English language editing.

Funding

Financial Support by Chang Gung Medical Foundation in Taiwan (CMRPG3M1291/2/3 for CLT; CMRPVVM0093 for MCY, CMRPD1M0611/2 for CNT), and National Science and Technology Council (114-2320-B-182-014 for CNT; 111-2314-B-182A-035-MY3 and 114-2314-B-182A-121 for CLT, 110-2314-B-182A-059-MY3 and 113-2314-B-182A-068 for MCY).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Chia-Lung Tsai, Ming-Chin Yu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genomic Medicine Core Laboratory, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan

    Chia-Lung Tsai

  2. Department of Surgery, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and operated by Chang-Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei City, 23652, Taiwan

    Ming-Chin Yu, Heng-Yuan Hsu & Chi-Neu Tsai

  3. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Ming-Chin Yu, Cheng-Lung Hsu & Heng-Yuan Hsu

  4. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan

    Cheng-Lung Hsu

  5. Metabolomics Core Laboratory, Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan

    Hsiang-Yu Tang & Mei-Ling Cheng

  6. Department of Biotechnology, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, 33348, Taiwan

    Yun-Shien Lee

  7. Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Lang-Ming Chi

  8. Department of Anatomical Pathology, Taipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei City, 10372, Taiwan

    Sey-En Lin

  9. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Mei-Ling Cheng

  10. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Chi-Neu Tsai

Authors
  1. Chia-Lung Tsai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming-Chin Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng-Lung Hsu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hsiang-Yu Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yun-Shien Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lang-Ming Chi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sey-En Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mei-Ling Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Heng-Yuan Hsu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chi-Neu Tsai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CL Tsai, MC Yu, and CN Tsai conceptualized and wrote the manuscript. YS Lee conducted the statistical analysis of TCGA-LIHC, ChIP, and RNA sequencing data. Hsu CL developed the HCC-PDx model and performed animal experiments. Chi LM contributed to proteomic processing and data analysis. SE Lin, Hsu HY, and MC Yu facilitated clinical specimen collection and conducted pathological analyses. HY Tang and ML Cheng assisted with LC/MS metabolite analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Neu Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures and Tables

Original data-1

original data-2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, CL., Yu, MC., Hsu, CL. et al. SOX4-STAT6-MTHFD2 axis drives hepatocellular carcinoma progression and treatment resistance. Cell Death Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-025-08394-2

Download citation

  • Received: 02 April 2025

  • Revised: 25 November 2025

  • Accepted: 15 December 2025

  • Published: 03 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-025-08394-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open access publishing
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Press Releases
  • About the Partner
  • Upcoming Conferences

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Cell Death & Disease (Cell Death Dis)

ISSN 2041-4889 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited