Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Cell Death & Disease
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. cell death & disease
  3. articles
  4. article
Dual inhibition of mTOR and HSP90 enhances cisplatin efficacy and overcomes resistance in ovarian cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 March 2026

Dual inhibition of mTOR and HSP90 enhances cisplatin efficacy and overcomes resistance in ovarian cancer

  • Rita Lombardi1 na1,
  • Laura Addi2 na1,
  • Biagio Pucci2 na1,
  • Francesca Bruzzese1,
  • Maura Sonego3,
  • Anna Nespolo  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-0294-86673,
  • Maria Serena Roca  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-09392,
  • Federica Iannelli2,
  • Luigi Alfano4,
  • Francesca Capone2 nAff6,
  • Elena Di Gennaro  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-78452,
  • Gustavo Baldassarre  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9750-88253 &
  • …
  • Alfredo Budillon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-60535 

Cell Death & Disease , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1060 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ovarian cancer
  • Phosphorylation

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents the most lethal gynecological disease, with a 5-year relative survival rate of 46% after the diagnosis. Standard treatment includes surgery followed by platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy. However, Pt-resistance frequently occurs and strongly impact on the survival of EOC patients for whom we still do not have valid therapeutic options. By using a proteomic approach, we previously demonstrated a potential role of HSP90 in the mechanism of resistance in vitro, ex vivo e partially in vivo. To further investigate in depth the mechanism by which EOC cells acquired Pt-resistance, we used a quantitative phosphoproteomics approach followed by enrichment functional analysis. Here, we identified 542 differentially expressed phosphoproteins in Pt-resistant compared to parental cells identifying mTOR and HSF1 as the most enriched pathways. The up-regulation of the phosphorylated form of PDK1, AKT, mTOR, and RPS6 was observed in Pt-resistant compared to parental cells. Moreover, we also demonstrated the up-regulation of the activity of HSF1 along with the elevation crucial components of the chaperone complex machinery HSP90, HSP70 and HSP40. Since mTOR is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention because of its key role in the crosstalk of various signaling pathways, we propose a novel therapeutic strategy based on the pharmacologic inhibition of HSP90 and mTOR able to further potentiate the Pt-based chemotherapy. Accordingly, the combination of ganetespib (an HSP90 inhibitor) and temsirolimus (a FDA approved-mTOR inhibitor) with cisplatin synergistically reduced colony formation and microtissues cell growth in vitro by increasing DNA-damage and apoptosis and in vivo enhancing mouse survival. Mechanistically, the triple combination treatment, impaired the proteins involved in mTOR signaling and HSF1 transactivation. Notably, all these data were confirmed also in Pt-resistant Non Small Cell Lung Cancer models. Collectively, our findings identify a promising new antitumor strategy for the treatment of Pt-resistance in cancer patients.

Similar content being viewed by others

Small-molecule inhibitor of C‑terminal HSP90 dimerization modulates autophagy and functions synergistically with mTOR inhibition to kill cisplatin-resistant cancer cells

Article Open access 23 December 2025

Mechanical activation and expression of HSP27 in epithelial ovarian cancer

Article Open access 03 February 2024

Assessment of Hsp90β-selective inhibitor safety and on-target effects

Article Open access 29 January 2025

Data availability

The raw data generated in this study are publicly available in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16564396). All datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

References

  1. Letai A, de The H. Conventional chemotherapy: millions of cures, unresolved therapeutic index. Nat Rev Cancer. 2025;25:209–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang C, Xu C, Gao X, Yao Q. Platinum-based drugs for cancer therapy and anti-tumor strategies. Theranostics. 2022;12:2115–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh S. Cisplatin: the first metal based anticancer drug. Bioorg Chem. 2019;88:102925.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hack J, Crabb SJ. Platinum-based chemotherapy ‘rechallenge’ in advanced non-ovarian solid malignancies. Clin Oncol. 2022;34:e329–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zon A, Bednarek I. Cisplatin in ovarian cancer treatment-known limitations in therapy force new solutions. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:7585.

  6. Richardson DL, Eskander RN, O’Malley DM. Advances in ovarian cancer care and unmet treatment needs for patients with platinum resistance: a narrative review. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:851–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gogineni V, Morand S, Staats H, Royfman R, Devanaboyina M, Einloth K, et al. Current ovarian cancer maintenance strategies and promising new developments. J Cancer. 2021;12:38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartoletti M, Pelizzari G, Gerratana L, Bortot L, Lombardi D, Nicoloso M, et al. Bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3805.

  9. McMullen M, Madariaga A, Lheureux S. New approaches for targeting platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;77:167–81.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pujade-Lauraine E, Fujiwara K, Ledermann JA, Oza AM, Kristeleit R, Ray-Coquard IL, et al. Avelumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer (JAVELIN Ovarian 200): an open-label, three-arm, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1034–46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fennell DA, Summers Y, Cadranel J, Benepal T, Christoph DC, Lal R, et al. Cisplatin in the modern era: the backbone of first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;44:42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chow LQM. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berek JS, Renz M, Kehoe S, Kumar L, Friedlander M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155:61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amable L. Cisplatin resistance and opportunities for precision medicine. Pharmacol Res. 2016;106:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lombardi R, Sonego M, Pucci B, Addi L, Iannelli F, Capone F, et al. HSP90 identified by a proteomic approach as druggable target to reverse platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:1005–23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milone MR, Lombardi R, Roca MS, Bruzzese F, Addi L, Pucci B, et al. Novel pathways involved in cisplatin resistance identified by a proteomics approach in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:9077–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minic Z, Dahms TES, Babu M. Chromatographic separation strategies for precision mass spectrometry to study protein-protein interactions and protein phosphorylation. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018;1102-1103:96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sonego M, Pellizzari I, Dall’Acqua A, Pivetta E, Lorenzon I, Benevol S, et al. Common biological phenotypes characterize the acquisition of platinum-resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7104.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sonego M, Poletto E, Pivetta E, Nicoloso MS, Pellicani R, Vinciguerra GLR et al. TIMP-1 is overexpressed and secreted by platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cells. 2019;9:6.

  20. Lorenzon I, Pellarin I, Pellizzari I, D’Andrea S, Belletti B, Sonego M, et al. Identification and characterization of a new platinum-induced TP53 mutation in MDAH ovarian cancer cells. Cells. 2019;9:36.

  21. Home T, Jensen RA, Rao R. Heat shock factor 1 in protein homeostasis and oncogenic signal integration. Cancer Res. 2015;75:907–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Panwar V, Singh A, Bhatt M, Tonk RK, Azizov S, Raza AS, et al. Multifaceted role of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling pathway in human health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:375.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno R, Banerjee S, Jackson AW, Quinn J, Baillie G, Dixon JE, et al. The stress-responsive kinase DYRK2 activates heat shock factor 1 promoting resistance to proteotoxic stress. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:1563–78.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goyal L, Chaudhary SP, Kwak EL, Abrams TA, Carpenter AN, Wolpin BM, et al. A phase 2 clinical trial of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP 90) inhibitor ganetespib in patients with refractory advanced esophagogastric cancer. Investig New Drugs. 2020;38:1533–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pillai RN, Fennell DA, Kovcin V, Ciuleanu TE, Ramlau R, Kowalski D, et al. Randomized Phase III study of ganetespib, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, with docetaxel versus docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (GALAXY-2). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:613–22.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fennell DA, Danson S, Woll PJ, Forster M, Talbot D, Child J, et al. Ganetespib in combination with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma (MESO-02): a phase Ib trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:4748–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ray-Coquard I, Braicu I, Berger R, Mahner S, Sehouli J, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Part I of GANNET53: a European multicenter phase I/II trial of the Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib combined with weekly paclitaxel in women with high-grade, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer-a study of the GANNET53 Consortium. Front Oncol. 2019;9:832.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Obermayr E, Mohr T, Schuster E, Braicu EI, Taube E, Sehouli J, et al. Gene expression markers in peripheral blood and outcome in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a study of the European GANNET53 consortium. Int J Cancer. 2024;155:1128–38.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22:27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kabadi PK, Vantangoli MM, Rodd AL, Leary E, Madnick SJ, Morgan JR, et al. Into the depths: techniques for in vitro three-dimensional microtissue visualization. Biotechniques. 2015;59:279–86.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kabadi PK, Rodd AL, Simmons AE, Messier NJ, Hurt RH, Kane AB. A novel human 3D lung microtissue model for nanoparticle-induced cell-matrix alterations. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16:15.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Michels J, Brenner C, Szabadkai G, Harel-Bellan A, et al. Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1257.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yue P, Han B, Zhao Y. Focus on the molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance based on multi-omics approaches. Mol Omics. 2023;19:297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pokhriyal R, Hariprasad R, Kumar L, Hariprasad G. Chemotherapy resistance in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Biomark Cancer. 2019;11:1179299X19860815.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cutillas PR. Role of phosphoproteomics in the development of personalized cancer therapies. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015;9:383–95.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qian L, Sun R, Xue Z, Guo T. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of epithelial ovarian cancers: a clinical perspective. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023;22:100578.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Birbo B, Madu EE, Madu CO, Jain A, Lu Y. Role of HSP90 in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10317.

  38. Concin N, Braicu I, Combe P, Berger R, Ray-Coquard I, Joly F, et al. GANNET53 Part II: a European phase I/II trial of the HSP90 inhibitor Ganetespib in high-grade platinum-resistant ovarian cancer - a study of the GANNET53 consortium. Clin Cancer Res. 2025;31:3160–74.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Concin N, Van Gorp T, Lorusso D, Ray-Coquard IL, Laenen A, Zamagni C, et al. European trial on enhanced DNA repair inhibition in ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2024;35:1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rastogi S, Joshi A, Sato N, Lee S, Lee MJ, Trepel JB, et al. An update on the status of HSP90 inhibitors in cancer clinical trials. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2024;29:519–39.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marques-Ramos A, Cervantes R. Expression of mTOR in normal and pathological conditions. Mol Cancer. 2023;22:112.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moschetta M, Reale A, Marasco C, Vacca A, Carratu MR. Therapeutic targeting of the mTOR-signalling pathway in cancer: benefits and limitations. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:3801–13.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maharati A, Rajabloo Y, Moghbeli M. Molecular mechanisms of mTOR-mediated cisplatin response in tumor cells. Heliyon. 2025;11:e41483.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng K, Gao Y, Xu J, Kang M, Chai R, Jin G, Kang Y. mTOR inhibitor everolimus modulates tumor growth in small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type and augments the drug sensitivity of cancer cells to cisplatin. Biomedicines. 2024;13:1.

  45. Zaja F, Federico M, Vitolo U, Zinzani PL. Management of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a review of current therapeutic strategies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:988–98.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kwitkowski VE, Prowell TM, Ibrahim A, Farrell AT, Justice R, Mitchell SS, et al. FDA approval summary: temsirolimus as treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2010;15:428–35.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Farley JH, Brady WE, O’Malley D, Fujiwara K, Yonemori K, Bonebrake A, et al. A phase II evaluation of temsirolimus with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by temsirolimus consolidation in clear cell ovarian cancer: An NRG oncology trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;167:423–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Emons G, Kurzeder C, Schmalfeldt B, Neuser P, de Gregorio N, Pfisterer J, et al. Temsirolimus in women with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer or advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A phase II study of the AGO-study group (AGO-GYN8). Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:450–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xie Y, Lei X, Zhao G, Guo R, Cui N. mTOR in programmed cell death and its therapeutic implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2023;71-72:66–81.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zou Z, Tao T, Li H, Zhu X. mTOR signaling pathway and mTOR inhibitors in cancer: progress and challenges. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:31.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Song M, Cui M, Liu K. Therapeutic strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;232:114205.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pan Z, Chen Y, Pang H, Wang X, Zhang Y, Xie X, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel dual inhibitors of heat shock protein 90/mammalian target of rapamycin (Hsp90/mTOR) against bladder cancer cells. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;242:114674.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Piro G, Roca MS, Bruzzese F, Carbone C, Iannelli F, Leone A, et al. Vorinostat potentiates 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin combination by inhibiting chemotherapy-induced EGFR nuclear translocation and increasing cisplatin uptake. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1405–17.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Alfano L, Caporaso A, Altieri A, Dell’Aquila M, Landi C, Bini L, et al. Depletion of the RNA binding protein HNRNPD impairs homologous recombination by inhibiting DNA-end resection and inducing R-loop accumulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:4068–85.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gambelli A, Nespolo A, Rampioni Vinciguerra GL, Pivetta E, Pellarin I, Nicoloso MS, et al. Platinum-induced upregulation of ITGA6 promotes chemoresistance and spreading in ovarian cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2024;16:1162–92.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nespolo A, Stefenatti L, Pellarin I, Gambelli A, Rampioni Vinciguerra GL, Karimbayli J, et al. USP1 deubiquitinates PARP1 to regulate its trapping and PARylation activity. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadp6567.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Iannelli F, Lombardi R, Costantini S, Roca MS, Addi L, Bruzzese F, et al. Integrated proteomics and metabolomics analyses reveal new insights into the antitumor effects of valproic acid plus simvastatin combination in a prostate cancer xenograft model associated with downmodulation of YAP/TAZ signaling. Cancer Cell Int. 2024;24:381.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Silva JC, Gorenstein MV, Li GZ, Vissers JP, Geromanos SJ. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:144–56.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:731–40.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Raudvere U, Kolberg L, Kuzmin I, Arak T, Adler P, Peterson H, et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W191–8.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bruzzese F, Rocco M, Castelli S, Di Gennaro E, Desideri A, Budillon A. Synergistic antitumor effect between vorinostat and topotecan in small cell lung cancer cells is mediated by generation of reactive oxygen species and DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:3075–87.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Terranova-Barberio M, Roca MS, Zotti AI, Leone A, Bruzzese F, Vitagliano C, et al. Valproic acid potentiates the anticancer activity of capecitabine in vitro and in vivo in breast cancer models via induction of thymidine phosphorylase expression. Oncotarget. 2016;7:7715–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente and 5 ×1000 funds to Istituto Nazionale Tumori G. Pascale (RC projects 4/39_25 and 4/20_25; 5×1000_2021_1) and by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Investigator Grant IG 26253 awarded to GB.

Funding

This work was supported by Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente and 5×1000 funds to Istituto Nazionale Tumori G. Pascale (RC projects 4/39_25 and 4/20_25; 5×1000_2021_1) and by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Investigator Grant IG 26253 awarded to GB.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Francesca Capone

    Present address: Laboratorio di Patologia Clinica, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specialità San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino, Italy

  2. These authors contributed equally: Rita Lombardi, Laura Addi, Biagio Pucci.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimental Animal Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS, Naples, Italy

    Rita Lombardi & Francesca Bruzzese

  2. Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS, Naples, Italy

    Laura Addi, Biagio Pucci, Maria Serena Roca, Federica Iannelli, Francesca Capone & Elena Di Gennaro

  3. Molecular Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Maura Sonego, Anna Nespolo & Gustavo Baldassarre

  4. Breast Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS, Naples, Italy

    Luigi Alfano

  5. Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS, Naples, Italy

    Alfredo Budillon

Authors
  1. Rita Lombardi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Addi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biagio Pucci
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesca Bruzzese
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maura Sonego
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anna Nespolo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maria Serena Roca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Federica Iannelli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Luigi Alfano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Francesca Capone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Elena Di Gennaro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gustavo Baldassarre
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Alfredo Budillon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Lombardi R, Addi L, Pucci B, Bruzzese F, Di Gennaro E, Baldassarre G, Budillon A conception and design of the study; Lombardi R, Addi L, Pucci B, Sonego M, Nespolo A, Roca MS, Iannelli F, Alfano L, Capone F data acquisition; Lombardi R, Addi L, Pucci B, Bruzzese F, Di Gennaro E, Baldassarre G, Budillon A analysis and interpretation of data; Budillon A, Di Gennaro E, Bruzzese F resources; Bruzzese F, Di Gennaro E, Baldassarre G, Budillon A supervision; Budillon A, Di Gennaro E, Bruzzese F funding acquisition; Lombardi R, Addi L, Pucci B, Bruzzese F, Di Gennaro E, Baldassarre G, Budillon A wrote the paper; Lombardi R, Addi L, Pucci B, graphed the data. All the authors revised the paper, contributed to the material and methods section, and edited the figures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Budillon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Professor Mauro Piacentini

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures (download PDF )

Supplementary Figure legends (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables (download PDF )

Supplementary Materials and Methods (download PDF )

WB uncropped (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lombardi, R., Addi, L., Pucci, B. et al. Dual inhibition of mTOR and HSP90 enhances cisplatin efficacy and overcomes resistance in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08533-3

Download citation

  • Received: 01 August 2025

  • Revised: 09 February 2026

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 27 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08533-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open access publishing
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Press Releases
  • About the Partner
  • Upcoming Conferences

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Cell Death & Disease (Cell Death Dis)

ISSN 2041-4889 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited