Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

TP0586532, a non-hydroxamate LpxC inhibitor, reduces LPS release and IL-6 production both in vitro and in vivo

Abstract

UDP-3-O-acyl-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase (LpxC) is an essential enzyme in the biosynthesis of Lipid A, an active component of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), from UDP-3-O-acyl-N-acetylglicosamine. LPS is a major component of the cell surface of Gram-negative bacteria. LPS is known to be one of causative factors of sepsis and has been associated with high mortality in septic shock. TP0586532 is a novel non-hydroxamate LpxC enzyme inhibitor. In this study, we examined the inhibitory effect of TP0586532 on the LPS release from Klebsiella pneumoniae both in vitro and in vivo. Our results confirmed the inhibitory effect of TP0586532 on LPS release from the pathogenic bacterial species. On the other hand, meropenem and ciprofloxacin increase the level of LPS release. Furthermore, the effects of TP0586532 on LPS release and interleukin (IL)-6 production in the lung were determined using a murine model of pneumonia caused by K. pneumoniae. As observed in the in vitro study, TP0586532 showed the marked inhibitory effect on LPS release in the lungs, whereas meropenem- and ciprofloxacin-treated mice showed higher levels of LPS release and IL-6 production in the lungs as compared to those in the lungs of vehicle-treated mice. Moreover, TP0586532 used in combination with meropenem and ciprofloxacin attenuated the LPS release and IL-6 production induced by meropenem and ciprofloxacin in the lung. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of TP0586532 on LPS release from pathogenic bacteria might be of benefit in patients with sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrison DC, Ryan JL. Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Annu Rev Med. 1987;38:417–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosmann M, Ward PA. The inflammatory response in sepsis. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kellum JA, Kong L, Fink MP, Weissfeld LA, Yealy DM, Pinsky MR, et al. Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1655–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oda S, Hirasawa H, Shiga H, Nakanishi K, Matsuda K, Nakamua M. Sequential measurement of IL-6 blood levels in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis. Cytokine 2005;29:169–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirikae T, Kirikae F, Saito S, Tominaga K, Tamura H, Uemura Y, et al. Biological characterization of endotoxins released from antibiotic-treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1015–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hilliard JJ, Melton JL, Hall L, Abbanat D, Fernandez J, Ward CK, et al. Comparative effects of carbapenems on bacterial load and host immune response in a Klebsiella pneumoniae murine pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:836–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Arnold RC, Horton JM, Studnek JR, et al. Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2066–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans ME, Pollack M. Effect of antibiotic class and concentration on the release of lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:1336–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandenburg K, Heinbochel L, Correa W, Lohner K. Peptides with dual mode of action: Killing bacteria and preventing endotoxin-induced sepsis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1858:971–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goscinski G, Tano E, Löwdin E, Sjölin J. Propensity to release endotoxin after two repeated doses of cefuroxime in an in vitro kinetic model: higher release after the second dose. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:328–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson JJ, Kropp H. beta-Lactam antibiotic-induced release of free endotoxin: in vitro comparison of penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2-specific imipenem and PBP 3-specific ceftazidime. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:1033–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nau R, Eiffert H. Modulation of release of proinflammatory bacterial compounds by antibacterials: potential impact on course of inflammation and outcome in sepsis and meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:95–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lepper PM, Held TK, Schneider EM, Bölke E, Gerlach H, Trautmann M. Clinical implications of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:824–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujiwara M, Nakagawa S, Eto M, Mizunaga S Inhibition of LpxC Activity and Elimination of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Release by T-1228 (RC-01). [Abstract] American Society for Microbiology Microbe 2019, abstr AAR-741.

  15. Lin L, Tan B, Pantapalangkoor P, Ho T, Baquir B, Tomaras A, et al. Inhibition of LpxC protects mice from resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by modulating inflammation and enhancing phagocytosis. MBio 2012;3:e00312–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uribe-Querol E, Rosales C. Control of Phagocytosis by Microbial Pathogens. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases/Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, The JAID/JSC Guide/Guidelines to Clinical Management of Infectious Disease Preparing Committee, Sepsis working group, Arakawa S, Kasai M, Kawai S, Sakata H, Mayumi T. The JAID/JSC guidelines for management of infectious diseases 2017 – Sepsis and catheter-related bloodstream infection. J Infect Chemother. 2021;27:657–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Castanheira M, Doyle TB, Kantro V, Mendes RE, Shortridge D. Meropenem-Vaborbactam activity against carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales isolates Collected in U.S. hospitals during 2016 to 2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e01951–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ushiyama F, Takashima H, Matsuda Y, Ogata Y, Sasamoto N, Kurimoto-Tsuruta R, et al. Lead optimization of 2-hydroxymethyl imidazoles as non-hydroxamate LpxC Inhibitors: discovery of TP0586532. Bioorg Med Chem. 2020;30:115964 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujita K, Takata I, Yoshida I, Okumura H, Otake K, Takashima H, et al. TP0586532, a Non-Hydroxamate LpxC Inhibitor, has in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities against Enterobacteriaceae. J Antibiot. (Tokyo). 2021. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00486-3. Online ahead of print.

  21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Approved Standard—Tenth Edition. M07–A11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2018.

  22. Norimatsu M, Morrison DC. Correlation of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release and cytokine production in Escherichia coli-inoculated mouse whole blood ex vivo. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:1302–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. GLobal Report On The Epidemiology And Burden Of Sepsis. World Health Organization. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334216/9789240010789-eng.pdf.

  24. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, et al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1552–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, Osborn TM, Townsend S, Dellinger RP, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1749–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mason DJ, Power EG, Talsania H, Phillips I, Gant VA. Antibacterial action of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2752–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Crosby HA, Bion JF, Penn CW, Elliott TS. Antibiotic-induced release of endotoxin from bacteria in vitro. J Med Microbiol. 1994;40:23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawai S, Nakagawa T, Sakayori S, Kobayashi O, Kamiya S. Effect of ciprofloxacin on levels of lipopolysaccharide and cytokines in experimentally induced Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia in mice. J Infect Chemother. 2006;12:119–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu G, Fan X, Li L, Wang H, Ding J, Hongbin W, et al. Interaction of antimicrobial peptide s-thanatin with lipopolysaccharide in vitro and in an experimental mouse model of septic shock caused by a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35:250–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:878–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Honda S, Sato K, Totsuka N, Fujiyama S, Fujimoto M, Miyake K, et al. Marginal zone B cells exacerbate endotoxic shock via interleukin-6 secretion induced by Fcα/μR-coupled TLR4 signalling. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibrahim YF, Moussa RA, Bayoumi AMA, Ahmed AI-SF. Tocilizumab attenuates acute lung and kidney injuries and improves survival in a rat model of sepsis via down-regulation of NF-κB/JNK: a possible role of P-glycoprotein. Inflammopharmacology 2020;28:215–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirano T, Murakami M. COVID-19: a new virus, but a familiar receptor and cytokine release syndrome. Immunity 2020;52:731–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schulte W, Bernhagen J, Bucala R. Cytokines in sepsis: potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets—an updated view. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:165974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ono S, Tsujimoto H, Hiraki S, Aosasa S. Mechanisms of sepsis-induced immunosuppression and immunological modification therapies for sepsis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2:351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaudhry H, Zhou J, Zhong Y, Ali MM, McGuire F, Nagarkatti PS, et al. Role of cytokines as a double-edged sword in sepsis. In Vivo. 2013;27:669–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiao W, Mindrinos MN, Seok J, Cuschieri J, Cuenca AG, Gao H, et al. A genomic storm in critically injured humans. J Exp Med. 2011;208:2581–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cao C, Yu M, Chai Y. Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen CW, Mittal R, Klingensmith NJ, Burd EM, Terhorst C, Martin GS, et al. Cutting edge: 2B4-mediated coinhibition of CD4+ T cells underlies mortality in experimental sepsis. J Immunol. 2017;199:1961–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shao R, Fang Y, Yu H, Zhao L, Jiang Z, Li CS. Monocyte programmed death ligand-1 expression after 3–4 days of sepsis is associated with risk stratification and mortality in septic patients: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2016;20:124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Patil NK, Guo Y, Luan L, Sherwood ER. Targeting immune cell checkpoints during sepsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brahmamdam P, Inoue S, Unsinger J, Chang KC, McDunn JE, Hotchkiss RS. Delayed administration of anti-PD-1 antibody reverses immune dysfunction and improves survival during sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:233–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Inoue S, Bo L, Bian J, Unsinger J, Chang K, Hotchkiss RS. Dose dependent effect of anti-CTLA-4 on survival in sepsis. Shock 2011;36:38–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, Baker JM, Iwashyna TJ, Bhattacharya J, et al. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:856–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Yusuke Honma for his helpful discussions and technical support for the experiments, Ms. Ai Shoji, Mr. Tomonori Aida and Ms. Satoko Murakami for their technical support for the experiments, and Mr. Fumihito Ushiyama for the synthesis of TP0586532.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Sugiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujita, K., Takata, I., Yoshida, I. et al. TP0586532, a non-hydroxamate LpxC inhibitor, reduces LPS release and IL-6 production both in vitro and in vivo. J Antibiot 75, 136–145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00498-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00498-z

Search

Quick links