Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Differential gene expression analysis shows that cephalosporin resistance is intrinsic to Clostridioides difficile strain 630

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common nosocomial infection in the US. CDI has become a growing concern due to C. difficile’s resistance to several antibiotics, including cephalosporins. Furthermore, patients administered cephalosporins are at higher risk of contracting CDI. Cephalosporins are β-lactam antibiotics, which prevent bacterial cell wall synthesis by inhibiting penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). β-lactam-resistant bacteria evade these antibiotics by producing β-lactamases or by harboring low-affinity PBPs. A genomic analysis of C. difficile strain 630 identified 31 putative β-lactam resistance genes. Upon cefoxitin exposure, few C. difficile strain 630 putative antibiotic-resistant genes were overexpressed. Most notably, the β-lactamase blaCDD gene was upregulated approximately 600-fold, as previously reported. Deletion of the blaCDD locus did not change in cephalosporin susceptibility. Deletion of the second most upregulated gene, the PBP vanY, was also ineffective at decreasing cephalosporin resistance. Cefoxitin exposure of the C. difficile strain 630ΔblaCDD mutant did not increase upregulation of other putative antibiotic resistance genes compared to wildtype C. difficile strain 630. Transcriptomic analyses of wildtype C. difficile strain 630 exposed to cephradine, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, or cefepime revealed the shared upregulation of a putative heterodimeric ABC transporter encoded by loci CD630_04590 (ABC transporter ATP-binding protein) and CD630_04600 (ABC transporter permease). These genes are genomically located directly downstream of blaCDD (CD630_04580). The deletion mutant CD630_04600 remained resistant to a number of antibiotics. Thus, even though blaCDD, CD630_04590, and CD630_04600 are all upregulated when exposed to cephalosporins, they do not seem to be involved in antibiotic resistance in C. difficile strain 630.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peng Z, et al. Update on Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile: Resistance Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. CDC, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States 2019. Atlanta, GA: U.S.D.o.H.a.H. Services; 2019.

  3. Fu Y, Luo Y, Grinspan AM. Epidemiology of community-acquired and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:17562848211016248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Desai K, et al. Epidemiological and economic burden of Clostridium difficile in the United States: estimates from a modeling approach. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Spigaglia P. Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Therapeutic Adv Infect Dis. 2016;3:23–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow AW, Cheng N, Bartlett KH. In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to new beta-lactam and quinolone antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:842–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. CDC, Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions — United States, 2022. 2022. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/antibiotic-use/data/report-2022.html.

  8. Slimings C, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: update of systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrobial Chemother. 2013;69:881–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1539–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. He M, et al. Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile. Nat Genet. 2013;45:109–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tipper DJ, Strominger JL. Mechanism of action of penicillins: a proposal based on their structural similarity to acyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1965;54:1133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zapun A, Contreras-Martel C, Vernet T. Penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:361–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher JF, Mobashery S. β-Lactam Resistance Mechanisms: Gram-Positive Bacteria and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. 2016;6:a025221.

  14. Blanco P, et al. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Much More Than Antibiotic Resistance Determinants. Microorganisms. 2016;4:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Salerno AJ, Lampen JO. Transcriptional analysis of beta-lactamase regulation in Bacillus licheniformis. J Bacteriol. 1986;166:769–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumas JL, et al. Analysis of antibiotic resistance gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by quantitative real-time-PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;254:217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minami S, et al. Induction of beta-lactamase by various beta-lactam antibiotics in Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;18:382–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dintner S, et al. Coevolution of ABC Transporters and Two-Component Regulatory Systems as Resistance Modules against Antimicrobial Peptides in Firmicute Bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:3851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Meehl M, et al. Interaction of the GraRS two-component system with the VraFG ABC transporter to support vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2679–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Maddux MS. Effects of beta-lactamase-mediated antimicrobial resistance: the role of beta-lactamase inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11:40s–50s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinfels E, et al. Characterization of YvcC (BmrA), a Multidrug ABC Transporter Constitutively Expressed in Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7491–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ealand CS, Machowski EE, Kana BD. β-lactam resistance: The role of low molecular weight penicillin binding proteins, β-lactamases and ld-transpeptidases in bacteria associated with respiratory tract infections. IUBMB Life. 2018;70:855–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoyland, Christopher N, et al. Structure of the LdcB LD-Carboxypeptidase Reveals the Molecular Basis of Peptidoglycan Recognition. Structure. 2014;22:949–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandhu BK, et al. Regulation and Anaerobic Function of the Clostridioides difficile β-Lactamase. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2019;64:e01496-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Toth M, et al. Intrinsic Class D β-Lactamases of Clostridium difficile. mBio. 2018;9:e01803–01818.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ammam F, et al. The functional vanGCd cluster of Clostridium difficile does not confer vancomycin resistance. Mol Microbiol. 2013;89:612–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Toth M, et al. Class D β-lactamases do exist in Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Metcalf D, Sharif S, Weese JS. Evaluation of candidate reference genes in Clostridium difficile for gene expression normalization. Anaerobe. 2010;16:439–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gibson DG, et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6:343–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ng YK, et al. Expanding the repertoire of gene tools for precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile genome: allelic exchange using pyrE alleles. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cartman ST, Minton NP. A mariner-based transposon system for in vivo random mutagenesis of Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;76:1103–1109.

  33. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998;8:186–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanehisa M, et al. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D587–d592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cañadas IC, et al. RiboCas: A Universal CRISPR-Based Editing Tool for Clostridium. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:1379–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1984;158:513–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hakenbeck R, Tarpay M, Tomasz A. Multiple changes of penicillin-binding proteins in penicillin-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;17:364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Moya B, et al. Beta-lactam resistance response triggered by inactivation of a nonessential penicillin-binding protein. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Peltier J, et al. Genomic and expression analysis of the vanG-like gene cluster of Clostridium difficile. Microbiology. 2013;159:1510–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lessard IA, Walsh CT. VanX, a bacterial D-alanyl-D-alanine dipeptidase: resistance, immunity, or survival function? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:11028–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Vuppada RK, et al. Phosphate signaling through alternate conformations of the PstSCAB phosphate transporter. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zea L, et al. A Molecular Genetic Basis Explaining Altered Bacterial Behavior in Space. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Aunins TR, et al. Spaceflight Modifies Escherichia coli Gene Expression in Response to Antibiotic Exposure and Reveals Role of Oxidative Stress Response. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. van Eijk E, et al. Complete genome sequence of the Clostridium difficile laboratory strain 630Δerm reveals differences from strain 630, including translocation of the mobile element CTn5. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Emerson JE, et al. Microarray analysis of the transcriptional responses of Clostridium difficile to environmental and antibiotic stress. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ngernsombat C, et al. CD2068 potentially mediates multidrug efflux in Clostridium difficile. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9982.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Peltier J, et al. Clostridium difficile has an original peptidoglycan structure with a high level of N-acetylglucosamine deacetylation and mainly 3-3 cross-links. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:29053–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sütterlin, L, et al., Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking Activity of l,d-Transpeptidases from Clostridium difficile and Inactivation of These Enzymes by β-Lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e01607–17.

  49. Galley NF, et al. Clostridioides difficile canonical L,D-transpeptidases catalyze a novel type of peptidoglycan cross-links and are not required for beta-lactam resistance. J Biol Chem. 2024;300:105529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Alabdali YAJ, et al. A cortex-specific penicillin-binding protein contributes to heat resistance in Clostridioides difficile spores. Anaerobe. 2021;70:102379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cuenot E et al. The Ser/Thr Kinase PrkC Participates in Cell Wall Homeostasis and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun. 2019;87:e00005-19.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health through grants numbers R01AI109139 and R16AI175022 to EAS. The project was also supported by a COBRE Phase I Pilot Grant (P20GM12132) from the Nevada Institute for Personalized Medicine (NIPM). The authors thank Prof. Nigel Minton from University of Nottingham for the training and materials for C. difficile CRISPR system, and Prof. Aimee Shen from Tufts University for the training and materials for C. difficile ACE knock-out system We also like to thank Dr. Shirley Shen from NIPM and Prof. Mira Han for their invaluable help and mentoring in transcriptome data acquisition and bioinformatics analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Abel-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turello, L.A., Consul, A., Yip, C. et al. Differential gene expression analysis shows that cephalosporin resistance is intrinsic to Clostridioides difficile strain 630. J Antibiot 78, 113–125 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-024-00795-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-024-00795-3

Search

Quick links