Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Transdisciplinary research

EXploring practice gaps to improve PERIoperativE Nutrition CarE (EXPERIENCE Study): a qualitative analysis of barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 73, pages 94–101 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Aligning care with best practice—such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines—may improve patient outcomes. However, translating research into practice is challenging and implementation science literature emphasises the importance of understanding barriers and enablers specific to the local context and clinicians. This study aimed to explore staff perceptions about barriers and enablers to practice change aligning with nutrition-related recommendations from ERAS guidelines.

Subjects/Methods

A qualitative study using a maximum variation sampling method. Clinicians involved in care of patients admitted to two general surgical wards consented to participate in semi-structured interviews. Framework analysis was undertaken using the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework to identify a priori and emergent themes.

Results

From interviews with 13 clinicians (two surgical consultants, one registrar, one intern; one anaesthetist; two nurse unit managers, one surgical nurse coordinator, three nurses; two dietitians), three major themes were identified: (a) complexity of the context (e.g., unpredictable theatre times, requirement for flexibility and large, multidisciplinary workforce); (b) strong decision-making hierarchy, combined with lack of knowledge, confidence or authority of junior and non-surgical staff to implement change; and (c) poor communication and teamwork (within and between disciplines). These barriers culminate in practice where default behaviours are habit, and the view that achieving clinical consensus is challenging.

Conclusions

This study highlights the necessity for a multifaceted implementation approach that simplifies the process, flattens the power differential and facilitates communication and teamwork. Other facilities may consider these findings when implementing similar practice change interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, Dziedzic K, Treweek S, Eldridge S, et al. Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews. Implement Sci. 2016;11:40–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, Hibbert PD, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197:100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman S, Deban M, Martelli V, Monette M, Sourial N, Hamadani F, et al. Association between quality of care and complications after abdominal surgery. Surgery. 2014;156:632–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora VM, Fish M, Basu A, Olson J, Plein C, Suresh K, et al. Relationship between quality of care of hospitalized vulnerable elders and postdischarge mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:1642–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2011;35:473–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:292–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gianotti L, Beretta S, Luperto M, Bernasconi D, Valsecchi MG, Braga M. Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:329–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oxman AD, Flottorp SA, Baker R, Godycki-Cwirko M, Krause J, Musila NR, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrnes A, Banks M, Mudge A, Young A, Bauer J. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery as an auditing framework for identifying improvements to perioperative nutrition care of older surgical patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:913–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011.

  12. Harvey G, Kitson A. Implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare: a facilitation guide. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2015.

  13. Brinkmann S. Qualitative interviewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

  14. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2012;31:783–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parkinson S, Eatough V, Holmes J, Stapley E, Midgley N. Framework analysis: a worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;13:109–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsen P, Roback K, Broström A, Ellström P-E. Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012;7:53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ament SMC, Gillissen F, Moser A, Maessen JMC, Dirksen CD, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Factors associated with sustainability of 2 quality improvement programs after achieving early implementation success. A qualitative case study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23:1135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, Aarts M-A, McKenzie M, McLeod RS, et al. A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg. 2015;261:92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gramlich LM, Sheppard CE, Wasylak T, Gilmour LE, Ljungqvist O, Basualdo-Hammond C, et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a strategy to transform surgical care across a health system. Implement Sci. 2017;12:67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gersick CJG, Hackman JR. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1990;47:65–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Bogaert P, Peremans L, de Wit M, Van Heusden D, Franck E, Timmermans O. et al. Nurse managers’ perceptions and experiences regarding staff nurse empowerment: a qualitative study. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1585–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jørgensen LB, Fridlund B. Restoring integrity—a grounded theory of coping with a fast track surgery programme. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2016;11:29864–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the RBWH Foundation, Brisbane, Australia (Research Grant, 2017), and by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship for AB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Angela Byrnes & Judy Bauer

  2. Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Adrienne Young & Merrilyn Banks

  3. Internal Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Alison Mudge

Authors
  1. Angela Byrnes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adrienne Young
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alison Mudge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Merrilyn Banks
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Judy Bauer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Byrnes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was received from the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the local health district (HREC Reference No: HREC/16/QRBW/470).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byrnes, A., Young, A., Mudge, A. et al. EXploring practice gaps to improve PERIoperativE Nutrition CarE (EXPERIENCE Study): a qualitative analysis of barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 94–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0276-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0276-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links