Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

MobiDetails: online DNA variants interpretation

A Correction to this article was published on 10 December 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

MobiDetails is an expert tool, online application which gathers useful data for the interpretation of DNA variants in the context of molecular diagnosis. It brings together in a single tool many sources of data, such as population genetics, various kinds of predictors, Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclatures, curated databases, and access to various annotations. Accurate interpretation of DNA variants is crucial and can impact the patient care or have familial outcomes (prenatal diagnosis). Its importance will increase in the coming years with the expansion of the personalized medicine. MobiDetails is specifically designed to help with this task. Exonic or intronic substitutions and small insertions/deletions related to more than 18,000 human genes are easily submitted and annotated in real-time. It is a responsive website that can be accessed using mobiles or tablets during medical staff meetings. MobiDetails is based on publicly available resources, does not include any specific data on patients or phenotypes, and is freely available for academic use at https://mobidetails.iurc.montp.inserm.fr/MD/.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 November 2020

    An amendment to this article has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the article.

  • 10 December 2020

    A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00789-3

References

  1. Peterson JF, Roden DM, Orlando LA, Ramirez AH, Mensah GA, Williams MS. Building evidence and measuring clinical outcomes for genomic medicine. Lancet. 2019;394:604–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boudellioua I, Mahamad Razali RB, Kulmanov M, Hashish Y, Bajic VB, Goncalves-Serra E, et al. Semantic prioritization of novel causative genomic variants. Karchin R, editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005500.

  3. Boussaroque A, Bergougnoux A, Raynal C, Audrézet M-P, Sasorith S, Férec C, et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of CFTR variants in the context of incidental findings. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:2239–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, Chapple CE, Albarca Aguilera M, Meyer R, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:1978–80.

  6. Wang J, Al-Ouran R, Hu Y, Kim S-Y, Wan Y-W, Wangler MF, et al. MARRVEL: Integration of human and model organism genetic resources to facilitate functional annotation of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100:843–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GRS, Thormann A, et al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu X, Wu C, Li C, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP v3.0: a one-stop database of functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Genome Aggregation Database Consortium, Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fokkema IFAC, Taschner PEM, Schaafsma GCP, Celli J, Laros JFJ, den Dunnen JT. LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeo G, Burge CB. Maximum entropy modeling of short sequence motifs with applications to RNA splicing signals. J Computational Biol. 2004;11:377–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patrinos GP, Cooper DN, van Mulligen E, Gkantouna V, Tzimas G, Tatum Z, et al. Microattribution and nanopublication as means to incentivize the placement of human genome variation data into the public domain. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1503–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sherry ST. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:308–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman PJ, Hart RK, Gretton LJ, Brookes AJ, Dalgleish R. VariantValidator: accurate validation, mapping, and formatting of sequence variation descriptions. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunnen JT, den, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, Hart RK, Greenblatt MS, McGowan‐Jordan J, et al. HGVS recommendations for the description of sequence variants: 2016 update. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:564–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wildeman M, van Ophuizen E, den Dunnen JT, Taschner PEM. Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:6–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Allot A, Peng Y, Wei C-H, Lee K, Phan L, Lu Z. LitVar: a semantic search engine for linking genomic variant data in PubMed and PMC. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W530–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Wang K. InterVar: clinical interpretation of genetic variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP guidelines. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100:267–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D862–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, Cheng Y, Schaub MA, Kasowski M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. 2012;22:1790–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Claustres M, Thèze C, des Georges M, Baux D, Girodon E, Bienvenu T, et al. CFTR-France, a national relational patient database for sharing genetic and phenotypic data associated with rare CFTR variants. Hum Mutat. 2017;38:1297–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Mou C, Swartz MD, Yu B, Bai Y, Tu Y, et al. dbMTS: A comprehensive database of putative human microRNA target site SNVs and their functional predictions. Hum Mutat. 2020;41:1123–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiel L, Baakman C, Gilissen D, Veltman JA, Vriend G, Gilissen C. MetaDome: pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:1030–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D886–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ionita-Laza I, McCallum K, Xu B, Buxbaum JD. A spectral approach integrating functional genomic annotations for coding and noncoding variants. Nat Genet. 2016;48:214–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yauy K, Baux D, Pegeot H, Van Goethem C, Mathieu C, Guignard T, et al. MoBiDiC prioritization algorithm, a free, accessible, and efficient pipeline for single-nucleotide variant annotation and prioritization for next-generation sequencing routine molecular diagnosis. J Mol Diagnostics. 2018;20:465–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jian X, Boerwinkle E, Liu X. In silico prediction of splice-altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:13534–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaganathan K, Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou S, McRae JF, Darbandi SF, Knowles D, Li YI, et al. Predicting splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning. Cell 2019;176:535–548.e24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:61–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat methods. 2010;7:248–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GLA, Edwards KJ, et al. Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:57–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, et al. REVEL: an Ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:877–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dong C, Wei P, Jian X, Gibbs R, Boerwinkle E, Wang K, et al. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:2125–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alirezaie N, Kernohan KD, Hartley T, Majewski J, Hocking TD. ClinPred: prediction tool to identify disease-relevant nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103:474–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chennen K, Weber T, Lornage X, Kress A, Böhm J, Thompson J, et al. MISTIC: a prediction tool to reveal disease-relevant deleterious missense variants. Andrade-Navarro MA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236962.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank early adopters of MobiDetails for their feedback and input, especially Drs. Vuthy Ea, Luke Mansard, Mouna Barat, Aurélien Perrin, Juliette Nectoux, and Alessandro Liquori. We thank Lawrence McGuire for the careful reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the French association “SOS Rétinite”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Baux.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baux, D., Van Goethem, C., Ardouin, O. et al. MobiDetails: online DNA variants interpretation. Eur J Hum Genet 29, 356–360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00755-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00755-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links