Table 5 Comparison of ACMG and ABC classification in dominant (cases 1–6), recessive (cases 7–11), and SNP-array (cases 12–16) settings.

From: Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant

Case#

Gene/CNV

Finding

Clinical information

ACMG class calculationa

ABC

ACMG class vs ABC class

1

F5

NM_000130.4:c.1601G > A

p.Arg534Gln

MAF 0.04–0.07 (Europeans)

A: unexpected deep venous thrombosis at age 56

VUS (PS3, PS4, PP1, BA1)

D/5 + 2

VUS D—susceptibility variant

2

JAK2

NM_004972.3:c.2048_2050del

p.(Arg683_Glu684insLys)

Not in gnomAD v2.1.1

A: high platelet counts, dominant trait in healthy asymptomatic family members

LP (PS4, PP1-M, PM2, PP4)

E/4 + 1

LP E—potential interest variant

3

UMOD

NM_001278614.1:c.915C > A

p.(Tyr305a)

Not in gnomAD v2.1.1

B: incidental finding in neonate with cyanosis, unknown if variant is inherited

VUS (PM2, PP3)

E/5 + 0

VUS E—no explanation found

4

BICD2

NM_015250.3:c.793A > G

p.(Met265Val)

8 in gnomAD v2.1.1

A: family with dominant drop-foot tendency, areflexia and thenar atrophy

VUS (PP1-M, PP3, BS1)

E/3 + 1

VUS E—potential interest variant

5

BRCA2

LRG_293t1:c.8177A > G

p.(Tyr2726Cys)

Not in gnomAD v.2.1.1

A: siblings with ca. ovarii, decreased repair function found in one study

LP (PS4, PM2, PP3, BP1)

D/4 + 2

LP D—susceptibility variant

6

CACNA1C

NM_000719.6:c.5852C > G

p.(Pro1951Arg) de novo

Not in gnomAD v.2.1.1

A: ID with autism, hypospadias and dysmorphic facial features

LP (PS2, PM2, PP2)

E/3 + 2

LP E—no explanation found

7

FECH

Chr18(GRCh38):g.5757571588A > G

NM_000140.3:c.315-48T > C

r.314_315ins315-49_315-1

MAF 0.11 in gnomAD v.2.1.1

A: erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), only one variant found

VUS (PS3, PS4, PP1-S, PM3, PP4, BA1)

D/4 + 2

VUS D—potential interest variant

8

C3

LRG_27t1:c.4893G > A

p.(Trp1631a) from father

Not in gnomAD v.2.1.1

A: atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Only case in family, both parents no signs of aHUS. Five healthy relatives carry the paternal variant in the last exon of C3, and three healthy relatives carry the maternal missense variant.

LP (PS3, PM2, PP3, BS2)

D/4 + 2

LP D—susceptibility variant

C3

LRG_27t1:c.2203C > T

p.(Arg735Trp) from mother

Not in gnomAD v.2.1.1

VUS (PM2, PP3, BS2)

E/3 + 2

VUS E—potential interest variant

C3

LRG_27t1:c.3346G > A p.(Gly1116Arg) from mother

MAF 0.002 in gnomAD v.2.1.1

LB (BP4, BS1)

F/2 + 0

LB F—not further classified

9

FLVCR2

NM_017791.2:c.615G > T p.(Trp205Cys) homozygous 1 in gnomAD v.2.1.1

A: aborted fetus with hydranencephaly and cerebral vasculopathy (Fowler syndrome)

VUS (PM2, PP3, PP4)

C/3 + 5

VUS C—pathogenic

10

CFTR

NM_000492.3:c.1521_1523del

p.(Phe508del) heterozygous

B: aortic aneurysm in young adult

P (PS1, PS3, BS2?)

E/5 + 0

P (incidental finding) E—no explanation found

11

CFTR

NM_000492.3:c.1521_1523del

p.(Phe508del) heterozygous

A: nasal polyps in young adult

P (PS1, PS3, PS4)

D/5 + 2

PD—susceptibility variant

12

Dup GRIA3

NC_000023.10:g.(123183157 _?)_(?_123704413)dup, unknown if dup on X is de novo

A: boy with learning problems and epilepsy

VUS, score 0.30?

E/3 + 1

VUS E—potential interest CNV

13

Del 15q13.3

Classic deletion (from BP4 to BP5)

Learning problems, psychosis

P, score 1.00

B/5 + 4

P B—pathogenic

14

Dup 15q13.3

Classic duplication (from BP4 to BP5)

Learning problems

VUS, score <0.45

D/4 + 2

VUS D—potential interest CNV

15

Genome

~10% of aut. genome is IBD

Fetus with occipital encephalocele and postaxial polydactyly

NA

E/3 + 2

E—potential interest ROH

16

Genome

~10% of aut. genome is IBD

Fetus with normal ultrasound findings

NA

F/3 + 0

F—normal finding

  1. Clinical information column: A = good match between known gene function and clinical phenotype, B = poor or no match between known gene function and clinical phenotype, NA not applicable, B benign, LB likely benign, VUS variant of unknown significance, LP likely pathogenic, P pathogenic, IBD identity by descent, aut. autosomal.
  2. aBased on Bayesian score in Tavtigian et al. [25] for SNPs, and Riggs et al. [18] for CNVs (cnvcalc.clinicalgenome.org/cnvcalc/).