Table 4 Associations between subjects in the 95th percentile vs 5th and third quintile and MM risk with the different types of scores.

From: A polygenic risk score for multiple myeloma risk prediction

Type of score

No of cases

No of controls

Distribution

ORa

95% CIa

pvalue

Unweighted 100% call rate

202

44

95% vs 5%

5.77

2.37–14.06

1.12 × 10−4

476

142

95% vs third quintile

4.22

2.11–8.44

4.52 × 10−5

Unweighted scaled

356

141

95% vs 5%

4.12

2.42–7.01

1.81 × 10−7

745

407

95% vs third quintile

3.05

2.15–4.32

3.73 × 10−10

Weighted 100% call rate

221

97

95% vs 5%

6.81

3.52–13.16

1.20 × 10−8

398

241

95% vs third quintile

3.05

1.98–4.70

4.41 × 10−7

Weighted scaled

316

141

95% vs 5%

4.29

2.52–7.30

7.95 × 10−8

646

352

95% vs third quintile

2.41

1.68–3.45

1.64 × 10−6